diff options
author | Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@postgresql.org> | 2019-10-16 13:23:18 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@postgresql.org> | 2019-10-16 13:23:18 +0200 |
commit | a524f50d0fc6fe6f2146ce708c2c9576d3734da4 (patch) | |
tree | d0de6dd44f392a7e4ca5c39d15aea1dae56c4b99 /src/backend/access/gist/gistsplit.c | |
parent | 8d48e6a7240cb0542577860e1bac768cd86fc633 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-a524f50d0fc6fe6f2146ce708c2c9576d3734da4.tar.gz postgresql-a524f50d0fc6fe6f2146ce708c2c9576d3734da4.zip |
Improve the check for pg_catalog.unknown data type in pg_upgrade
The pg_upgrade check for pg_catalog.unknown type when upgrading from 9.6
had a couple of issues with domains and composite types - it detected
even composite types unused in objects with storage. So for example this
was enough to trigger an unnecessary pg_upgrade failure:
CREATE TYPE unknown_composite AS (u pg_catalog.unknown)
On the other hand, this only happened with composite types directly on
the pg_catalog.unknown data type, but not with a domain. So this was not
detected
CREATE DOMAIN unknown_domain AS pg_catalog.unknown;
CREATE TYPE unknown_composite_2 AS (u unknown_domain);
unlike the first example. These false positives and inconsistencies are
unfortunate, but what's worse we've failed to detected objects using the
pg_catalog.unknown type through a domain. So we missed cases like this
CREATE TABLE t (u unknown_composite_2);
The consequence is clusters broken after a pg_upgrade.
This fixes these false positives and false negatives by using the same
recursive CTE introduced by eaf900e842 for sql_identifier. Backpatch all
the way to 10, where the of pg_catalog.unknown data type was restricted.
Author: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-to: 10-
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16045-673e8fa6b5ace196%40postgresql.org
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/access/gist/gistsplit.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions