aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/access/gist/gistutil.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2022-09-27 11:47:12 -0400
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2022-09-27 11:47:12 -0400
commit385366426511399a91da327c0f04765bbcfd5322 (patch)
treebb6851d6157032806a9df6ab23a4242b548bb378 /src/backend/access/gist/gistutil.c
parent4148c8b3daf95ca308f055e103f6ee82e25b8f99 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-385366426511399a91da327c0f04765bbcfd5322.tar.gz
postgresql-385366426511399a91da327c0f04765bbcfd5322.zip
Introduce GUC_NO_RESET flag.
Previously, the transaction-property GUCs such as transaction_isolation could be reset after starting a transaction, because we marked them as GUC_NO_RESET_ALL but still allowed a targeted RESET. That leads to assertion failures or worse, because those properties aren't supposed to change after we've acquired a transaction snapshot. There are some NO_RESET_ALL variables for which RESET is okay, so we can't just redefine the semantics of that flag. Instead introduce a separate GUC_NO_RESET flag. Mark "seed", as well as the transaction property GUCs, as GUC_NO_RESET. We have to disallow GUC_ACTION_SAVE as well as straight RESET, because otherwise a function having a "SET transaction_isolation" clause can still break things: the end-of-function restore action is equivalent to a RESET. No back-patch, as it's conceivable that someone is doing something this patch will forbid (like resetting one of these GUCs at transaction start, or "CREATE FUNCTION ... SET transaction_read_only = 1") and not running into problems with it today. Given how long we've had this issue and not noticed, the side effects in non-assert builds can't be too serious. Per bug #17385 from Andrew Bille. Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17385-9ee529fb091f0ce5@postgresql.org
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/access/gist/gistutil.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions