diff options
author | Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> | 2025-04-28 12:11:08 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> | 2025-04-28 12:11:08 -0400 |
commit | b75fedcab7916e1c955dbab565b7ad0cee6b37c6 (patch) | |
tree | 984311fcb5d737c6733611a3645308478af57e9a /src/backend/access/gist/gistvacuum.c | |
parent | 0e13b13d26e870cb18fe6ecf9f8697ddfcf2c740 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-b75fedcab7916e1c955dbab565b7ad0cee6b37c6.tar.gz postgresql-b75fedcab7916e1c955dbab565b7ad0cee6b37c6.zip |
Make NULL tuple values always advance skip arrays.
_bt_check_compare neglected to handle a case that can arise when the
scan's keys are temporarily treated as nonrequired, as an optimization:
whenever a NULL tuple value was encountered that had a skip array whose
current element wasn't already NULL, _bt_check_compare failed to advance
the array to the NULL element. This allowed _bt_check_compare to fail
to return matching tuples containing a NULL value (though only with an
array column that came before a skip array column with NULLs, and only
during _bt_readpage calls that set pstate.forcenonrequired=true on a
page where the higher-order column also had to advance).
To fix, teach _bt_check_compare to handle this case just like any other
case where a skip array key is unsatisfied and must be advanced directly
(due to the key being considered a nonrequired key).
Oversight in commit 8a510275, which optimized nbtree search scan key
comparisons with skip arrays.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHgHdKtLFWZcjr87hMH0hYDHgcifu4Tj7iHz-xh8qsJREt5cqA@mail.gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/access/gist/gistvacuum.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions