diff options
author | Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> | 2001-10-25 05:50:21 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> | 2001-10-25 05:50:21 +0000 |
commit | b81844b1738c584d92330a5ccd0fbd8b603d2886 (patch) | |
tree | 4fae0d4cd26048177fc5cd1a2dd91abc99ba0f99 /src/backend/executor/execMain.c | |
parent | 59da2105d8e6d95345b3b942a2e2aba8cead4838 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-b81844b1738c584d92330a5ccd0fbd8b603d2886.tar.gz postgresql-b81844b1738c584d92330a5ccd0fbd8b603d2886.zip |
pgindent run on all C files. Java run to follow. initdb/regression
tests pass.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/execMain.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/execMain.c | 83 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execMain.c b/src/backend/executor/execMain.c index 6b1db391eeb..6e1145ac779 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execMain.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execMain.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ * * * IDENTIFICATION - * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execMain.c,v 1.148 2001/09/18 01:59:06 tgl Exp $ + * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execMain.c,v 1.149 2001/10/25 05:49:27 momjian Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ @@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ ExecutorEnd(QueryDesc *queryDesc, EState *estate) static void ExecCheckQueryPerms(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan) { - /* * Check RTEs in the query's primary rangetable. */ @@ -428,7 +427,6 @@ ExecCheckRTEPerms(RangeTblEntry *rte, CmdType operation) if (rte->checkForWrite) { - /* * Note: write access in a SELECT context means SELECT FOR UPDATE. * Right now we don't distinguish that from true update as far as @@ -521,7 +519,6 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate) if (resultRelations != NIL) { - /* * Multiple result relations (due to inheritance) * parseTree->resultRelations identifies them all @@ -544,7 +541,6 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate) } else { - /* * Single result relation identified by * parseTree->resultRelation @@ -564,7 +560,6 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate) } else { - /* * if no result relation, then set state appropriately */ @@ -599,9 +594,9 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate) /* * initialize the executor "tuple" table. We need slots for all the - * plan nodes, plus possibly output slots for the junkfilter(s). - * At this point we aren't sure if we need junkfilters, so just add - * slots for them unconditionally. + * plan nodes, plus possibly output slots for the junkfilter(s). At + * this point we aren't sure if we need junkfilters, so just add slots + * for them unconditionally. */ { int nSlots = ExecCountSlotsNode(plan); @@ -669,7 +664,6 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate) if (junk_filter_needed) { - /* * If there are multiple result relations, each one needs its * own junk filter. Note this is only possible for @@ -694,7 +688,7 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate) j = ExecInitJunkFilter(subplan->targetlist, ExecGetTupType(subplan), - ExecAllocTableSlot(estate->es_tupleTable)); + ExecAllocTableSlot(estate->es_tupleTable)); resultRelInfo->ri_junkFilter = j; resultRelInfo++; subplans = lnext(subplans); @@ -714,7 +708,7 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate) j = ExecInitJunkFilter(plan->targetlist, tupType, - ExecAllocTableSlot(estate->es_tupleTable)); + ExecAllocTableSlot(estate->es_tupleTable)); estate->es_junkFilter = j; if (estate->es_result_relation_info) estate->es_result_relation_info->ri_junkFilter = j; @@ -741,13 +735,11 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate) if (!parseTree->isPortal) { - /* * a select into table */ if (parseTree->into != NULL) { - /* * create the "into" relation */ @@ -1101,7 +1093,7 @@ lnext: ; newTuple = ExecRemoveJunk(junkfilter, slot); slot = ExecStoreTuple(newTuple, /* tuple to store */ - junkfilter->jf_resultSlot, /* dest slot */ + junkfilter->jf_resultSlot, /* dest slot */ InvalidBuffer, /* this tuple has no * buffer */ true); /* tuple should be pfreed */ @@ -1234,7 +1226,7 @@ ExecAppend(TupleTableSlot *slot, /* BEFORE ROW INSERT Triggers */ if (resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc && - resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc->n_before_row[TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT] > 0) + resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc->n_before_row[TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT] > 0) { HeapTuple newtuple; @@ -1245,7 +1237,6 @@ ExecAppend(TupleTableSlot *slot, if (newtuple != tuple) /* modified by Trigger(s) */ { - /* * Insert modified tuple into tuple table slot, replacing the * original. We assume that it was allocated in per-tuple @@ -1314,7 +1305,7 @@ ExecDelete(TupleTableSlot *slot, /* BEFORE ROW DELETE Triggers */ if (resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc && - resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc->n_before_row[TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE] > 0) + resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc->n_before_row[TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE] > 0) { bool dodelete; @@ -1421,7 +1412,7 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot, /* BEFORE ROW UPDATE Triggers */ if (resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc && - resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc->n_before_row[TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE] > 0) + resultRelInfo->ri_TrigDesc->n_before_row[TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE] > 0) { HeapTuple newtuple; @@ -1433,7 +1424,6 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot, if (newtuple != tuple) /* modified by Trigger(s) */ { - /* * Insert modified tuple into tuple table slot, replacing the * original. We assume that it was allocated in per-tuple @@ -1448,11 +1438,11 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot, /* * Check the constraints of the tuple * - * If we generate a new candidate tuple after EvalPlanQual testing, - * we must loop back here and recheck constraints. (We don't need to - * redo triggers, however. If there are any BEFORE triggers then - * trigger.c will have done mark4update to lock the correct tuple, - * so there's no need to do them again.) + * If we generate a new candidate tuple after EvalPlanQual testing, we + * must loop back here and recheck constraints. (We don't need to + * redo triggers, however. If there are any BEFORE triggers then + * trigger.c will have done mark4update to lock the correct tuple, so + * there's no need to do them again.) */ lreplace:; if (resultRelationDesc->rd_att->constr) @@ -1483,7 +1473,7 @@ lreplace:; *tupleid = ctid; tuple = ExecRemoveJunk(estate->es_junkFilter, epqslot); slot = ExecStoreTuple(tuple, - estate->es_junkFilter->jf_resultSlot, + estate->es_junkFilter->jf_resultSlot, InvalidBuffer, true); goto lreplace; } @@ -1641,9 +1631,7 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid) */ if (estate->es_result_relation_info != NULL && estate->es_result_relation_info->ri_RangeTableIndex == rti) - { relation = estate->es_result_relation_info->ri_RelationDesc; - } else { List *l; @@ -1724,7 +1712,7 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid) *tid = tuple.t_self; /* - * Need to run a recheck subquery. Find or create a PQ stack entry. + * Need to run a recheck subquery. Find or create a PQ stack entry. */ epq = (evalPlanQual *) estate->es_evalPlanQual; rtsize = length(estate->es_range_table); @@ -1782,18 +1770,20 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid) { newepq = (evalPlanQual *) palloc(sizeof(evalPlanQual)); newepq->free = NULL; + /* - * Each stack level has its own copy of the plan tree. This + * Each stack level has its own copy of the plan tree. This * is wasteful, but necessary as long as plan nodes point to - * exec state nodes rather than vice versa. Note that copyfuncs.c - * doesn't attempt to copy the exec state nodes, which is a good - * thing in this situation. + * exec state nodes rather than vice versa. Note that + * copyfuncs.c doesn't attempt to copy the exec state nodes, + * which is a good thing in this situation. */ newepq->plan = copyObject(estate->es_origPlan); + /* * Init stack level's EState. We share top level's copy of - * es_result_relations array and other non-changing status. - * We need our own tupletable, es_param_exec_vals, and other + * es_result_relations array and other non-changing status. We + * need our own tupletable, es_param_exec_vals, and other * changeable state. */ epqstate = &(newepq->estate); @@ -1805,11 +1795,12 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid) sizeof(ParamExecData)); epqstate->es_tupleTable = NULL; epqstate->es_per_tuple_exprcontext = NULL; + /* - * Each epqstate must have its own es_evTupleNull state, - * but all the stack entries share es_evTuple state. This - * allows sub-rechecks to inherit the value being examined by - * an outer recheck. + * Each epqstate must have its own es_evTupleNull state, but + * all the stack entries share es_evTuple state. This allows + * sub-rechecks to inherit the value being examined by an + * outer recheck. */ epqstate->es_evTupleNull = (bool *) palloc(rtsize * sizeof(bool)); if (epq == NULL) @@ -1842,12 +1833,12 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid) epqstate = &(epq->estate); /* - * Ok - we're requested for the same RTE. Unfortunately we still - * have to end and restart execution of the plan, because ExecReScan + * Ok - we're requested for the same RTE. Unfortunately we still have + * to end and restart execution of the plan, because ExecReScan * wouldn't ensure that upper plan nodes would reset themselves. We - * could make that work if insertion of the target tuple were integrated - * with the Param mechanism somehow, so that the upper plan nodes know - * that their children's outputs have changed. + * could make that work if insertion of the target tuple were + * integrated with the Param mechanism somehow, so that the upper plan + * nodes know that their children's outputs have changed. */ if (endNode) { @@ -1858,8 +1849,8 @@ EvalPlanQual(EState *estate, Index rti, ItemPointer tid) } /* - * free old RTE' tuple, if any, and store target tuple where relation's - * scan node will see it + * free old RTE' tuple, if any, and store target tuple where + * relation's scan node will see it */ if (epqstate->es_evTuple[rti - 1] != NULL) heap_freetuple(epqstate->es_evTuple[rti - 1]); |