diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2011-01-12 20:47:09 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2011-01-12 20:47:09 -0500 |
commit | fed8dcdb84d255088d22efa3156a193f3399e792 (patch) | |
tree | 8262474db57695b73d2fcdb0975a5f89f5573307 /src/backend/executor/execMain.c | |
parent | a1ed4cf6ca6ee2115d9f618ed7930a97842042a8 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-fed8dcdb84d255088d22efa3156a193f3399e792.tar.gz postgresql-fed8dcdb84d255088d22efa3156a193f3399e792.zip |
Fix PlanRowMark/ExecRowMark structures to handle inheritance correctly.
In an inherited UPDATE/DELETE, each target table has its own subplan,
because it might have a column set different from other targets. This
means that the resjunk columns we add to support EvalPlanQual might be
at different physical column numbers in each subplan. The EvalPlanQual
rewrite I did for 9.0 failed to account for this, resulting in possible
misbehavior or even crashes during concurrent updates to the same row,
as seen in a recent report from Gordon Shannon. Revise the data structure
so that we track resjunk column numbers separately for each subplan.
I also chose to move responsibility for identifying the physical column
numbers back to executor startup, instead of assuming that numbers derived
during preprocess_targetlist would stay valid throughout subsequent
massaging of the plan. That's a bit slower, so we might want to consider
undoing it someday; but it would complicate the patch considerably and
didn't seem justifiable in a bug fix that has to be back-patched to 9.0.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/execMain.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/execMain.c | 107 |
1 files changed, 82 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execMain.c b/src/backend/executor/execMain.c index 0b6cbcc4af0..6d4a77328a4 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execMain.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execMain.c @@ -728,9 +728,6 @@ InitPlan(QueryDesc *queryDesc, int eflags) erm->prti = rc->prti; erm->markType = rc->markType; erm->noWait = rc->noWait; - erm->ctidAttNo = rc->ctidAttNo; - erm->toidAttNo = rc->toidAttNo; - erm->wholeAttNo = rc->wholeAttNo; ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(erm->curCtid)); estate->es_rowMarks = lappend(estate->es_rowMarks, erm); } @@ -1335,6 +1332,71 @@ ExecConstraints(ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, /* + * ExecFindRowMark -- find the ExecRowMark struct for given rangetable index + */ +ExecRowMark * +ExecFindRowMark(EState *estate, Index rti) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + foreach(lc, estate->es_rowMarks) + { + ExecRowMark *erm = (ExecRowMark *) lfirst(lc); + + if (erm->rti == rti) + return erm; + } + elog(ERROR, "failed to find ExecRowMark for rangetable index %u", rti); + return NULL; /* keep compiler quiet */ +} + +/* + * ExecBuildAuxRowMark -- create an ExecAuxRowMark struct + * + * Inputs are the underlying ExecRowMark struct and the targetlist of the + * input plan node (not planstate node!). We need the latter to find out + * the column numbers of the resjunk columns. + */ +ExecAuxRowMark * +ExecBuildAuxRowMark(ExecRowMark *erm, List *targetlist) +{ + ExecAuxRowMark *aerm = (ExecAuxRowMark *) palloc0(sizeof(ExecAuxRowMark)); + char resname[32]; + + aerm->rowmark = erm; + + /* Look up the resjunk columns associated with this rowmark */ + if (erm->relation) + { + Assert(erm->markType != ROW_MARK_COPY); + + /* if child rel, need tableoid */ + if (erm->rti != erm->prti) + { + snprintf(resname, sizeof(resname), "tableoid%u", erm->prti); + aerm->toidAttNo = ExecFindJunkAttributeInTlist(targetlist, + resname); + } + + /* always need ctid for real relations */ + snprintf(resname, sizeof(resname), "ctid%u", erm->prti); + aerm->ctidAttNo = ExecFindJunkAttributeInTlist(targetlist, + resname); + } + else + { + Assert(erm->markType == ROW_MARK_COPY); + + snprintf(resname, sizeof(resname), "wholerow%u", erm->prti); + aerm->wholeAttNo = ExecFindJunkAttributeInTlist(targetlist, + resname); + } + + return aerm; +} + + +/* * EvalPlanQual logic --- recheck modified tuple(s) to see if we want to * process the updated version under READ COMMITTED rules. * @@ -1624,11 +1686,13 @@ EvalPlanQualFetch(EState *estate, Relation relation, int lockmode, /* * EvalPlanQualInit -- initialize during creation of a plan state node * that might need to invoke EPQ processing. - * Note: subplan can be NULL if it will be set later with EvalPlanQualSetPlan. + * + * Note: subplan/auxrowmarks can be NULL/NIL if they will be set later + * with EvalPlanQualSetPlan. */ void EvalPlanQualInit(EPQState *epqstate, EState *estate, - Plan *subplan, int epqParam) + Plan *subplan, List *auxrowmarks, int epqParam) { /* Mark the EPQ state inactive */ epqstate->estate = NULL; @@ -1636,7 +1700,7 @@ EvalPlanQualInit(EPQState *epqstate, EState *estate, epqstate->origslot = NULL; /* ... and remember data that EvalPlanQualBegin will need */ epqstate->plan = subplan; - epqstate->rowMarks = NIL; + epqstate->arowMarks = auxrowmarks; epqstate->epqParam = epqParam; } @@ -1646,25 +1710,14 @@ EvalPlanQualInit(EPQState *epqstate, EState *estate, * We need this so that ModifyTuple can deal with multiple subplans. */ void -EvalPlanQualSetPlan(EPQState *epqstate, Plan *subplan) +EvalPlanQualSetPlan(EPQState *epqstate, Plan *subplan, List *auxrowmarks) { /* If we have a live EPQ query, shut it down */ EvalPlanQualEnd(epqstate); /* And set/change the plan pointer */ epqstate->plan = subplan; -} - -/* - * EvalPlanQualAddRowMark -- add an ExecRowMark that EPQ needs to handle. - * - * Currently, only non-locking RowMarks are supported. - */ -void -EvalPlanQualAddRowMark(EPQState *epqstate, ExecRowMark *erm) -{ - if (RowMarkRequiresRowShareLock(erm->markType)) - elog(ERROR, "EvalPlanQual doesn't support locking rowmarks"); - epqstate->rowMarks = lappend(epqstate->rowMarks, erm); + /* The rowmarks depend on the plan, too */ + epqstate->arowMarks = auxrowmarks; } /* @@ -1714,13 +1767,17 @@ EvalPlanQualFetchRowMarks(EPQState *epqstate) Assert(epqstate->origslot != NULL); - foreach(l, epqstate->rowMarks) + foreach(l, epqstate->arowMarks) { - ExecRowMark *erm = (ExecRowMark *) lfirst(l); + ExecAuxRowMark *aerm = (ExecAuxRowMark *) lfirst(l); + ExecRowMark *erm = aerm->rowmark; Datum datum; bool isNull; HeapTupleData tuple; + if (RowMarkRequiresRowShareLock(erm->markType)) + elog(ERROR, "EvalPlanQual doesn't support locking rowmarks"); + /* clear any leftover test tuple for this rel */ EvalPlanQualSetTuple(epqstate, erm->rti, NULL); @@ -1736,7 +1793,7 @@ EvalPlanQualFetchRowMarks(EPQState *epqstate) Oid tableoid; datum = ExecGetJunkAttribute(epqstate->origslot, - erm->toidAttNo, + aerm->toidAttNo, &isNull); /* non-locked rels could be on the inside of outer joins */ if (isNull) @@ -1752,7 +1809,7 @@ EvalPlanQualFetchRowMarks(EPQState *epqstate) /* fetch the tuple's ctid */ datum = ExecGetJunkAttribute(epqstate->origslot, - erm->ctidAttNo, + aerm->ctidAttNo, &isNull); /* non-locked rels could be on the inside of outer joins */ if (isNull) @@ -1777,7 +1834,7 @@ EvalPlanQualFetchRowMarks(EPQState *epqstate) /* fetch the whole-row Var for the relation */ datum = ExecGetJunkAttribute(epqstate->origslot, - erm->wholeAttNo, + aerm->wholeAttNo, &isNull); /* non-locked rels could be on the inside of outer joins */ if (isNull) |