aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/executor/execMain.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2011-01-12 20:47:09 -0500
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2011-01-12 20:47:09 -0500
commitfed8dcdb84d255088d22efa3156a193f3399e792 (patch)
tree8262474db57695b73d2fcdb0975a5f89f5573307 /src/backend/executor/execMain.c
parenta1ed4cf6ca6ee2115d9f618ed7930a97842042a8 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-fed8dcdb84d255088d22efa3156a193f3399e792.tar.gz
postgresql-fed8dcdb84d255088d22efa3156a193f3399e792.zip
Fix PlanRowMark/ExecRowMark structures to handle inheritance correctly.
In an inherited UPDATE/DELETE, each target table has its own subplan, because it might have a column set different from other targets. This means that the resjunk columns we add to support EvalPlanQual might be at different physical column numbers in each subplan. The EvalPlanQual rewrite I did for 9.0 failed to account for this, resulting in possible misbehavior or even crashes during concurrent updates to the same row, as seen in a recent report from Gordon Shannon. Revise the data structure so that we track resjunk column numbers separately for each subplan. I also chose to move responsibility for identifying the physical column numbers back to executor startup, instead of assuming that numbers derived during preprocess_targetlist would stay valid throughout subsequent massaging of the plan. That's a bit slower, so we might want to consider undoing it someday; but it would complicate the patch considerably and didn't seem justifiable in a bug fix that has to be back-patched to 9.0.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/execMain.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/executor/execMain.c107
1 files changed, 82 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execMain.c b/src/backend/executor/execMain.c
index 0b6cbcc4af0..6d4a77328a4 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/execMain.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/execMain.c
@@ -728,9 +728,6 @@ InitPlan(QueryDesc *queryDesc, int eflags)
erm->prti = rc->prti;
erm->markType = rc->markType;
erm->noWait = rc->noWait;
- erm->ctidAttNo = rc->ctidAttNo;
- erm->toidAttNo = rc->toidAttNo;
- erm->wholeAttNo = rc->wholeAttNo;
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(erm->curCtid));
estate->es_rowMarks = lappend(estate->es_rowMarks, erm);
}
@@ -1335,6 +1332,71 @@ ExecConstraints(ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo,
/*
+ * ExecFindRowMark -- find the ExecRowMark struct for given rangetable index
+ */
+ExecRowMark *
+ExecFindRowMark(EState *estate, Index rti)
+{
+ ListCell *lc;
+
+ foreach(lc, estate->es_rowMarks)
+ {
+ ExecRowMark *erm = (ExecRowMark *) lfirst(lc);
+
+ if (erm->rti == rti)
+ return erm;
+ }
+ elog(ERROR, "failed to find ExecRowMark for rangetable index %u", rti);
+ return NULL; /* keep compiler quiet */
+}
+
+/*
+ * ExecBuildAuxRowMark -- create an ExecAuxRowMark struct
+ *
+ * Inputs are the underlying ExecRowMark struct and the targetlist of the
+ * input plan node (not planstate node!). We need the latter to find out
+ * the column numbers of the resjunk columns.
+ */
+ExecAuxRowMark *
+ExecBuildAuxRowMark(ExecRowMark *erm, List *targetlist)
+{
+ ExecAuxRowMark *aerm = (ExecAuxRowMark *) palloc0(sizeof(ExecAuxRowMark));
+ char resname[32];
+
+ aerm->rowmark = erm;
+
+ /* Look up the resjunk columns associated with this rowmark */
+ if (erm->relation)
+ {
+ Assert(erm->markType != ROW_MARK_COPY);
+
+ /* if child rel, need tableoid */
+ if (erm->rti != erm->prti)
+ {
+ snprintf(resname, sizeof(resname), "tableoid%u", erm->prti);
+ aerm->toidAttNo = ExecFindJunkAttributeInTlist(targetlist,
+ resname);
+ }
+
+ /* always need ctid for real relations */
+ snprintf(resname, sizeof(resname), "ctid%u", erm->prti);
+ aerm->ctidAttNo = ExecFindJunkAttributeInTlist(targetlist,
+ resname);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ Assert(erm->markType == ROW_MARK_COPY);
+
+ snprintf(resname, sizeof(resname), "wholerow%u", erm->prti);
+ aerm->wholeAttNo = ExecFindJunkAttributeInTlist(targetlist,
+ resname);
+ }
+
+ return aerm;
+}
+
+
+/*
* EvalPlanQual logic --- recheck modified tuple(s) to see if we want to
* process the updated version under READ COMMITTED rules.
*
@@ -1624,11 +1686,13 @@ EvalPlanQualFetch(EState *estate, Relation relation, int lockmode,
/*
* EvalPlanQualInit -- initialize during creation of a plan state node
* that might need to invoke EPQ processing.
- * Note: subplan can be NULL if it will be set later with EvalPlanQualSetPlan.
+ *
+ * Note: subplan/auxrowmarks can be NULL/NIL if they will be set later
+ * with EvalPlanQualSetPlan.
*/
void
EvalPlanQualInit(EPQState *epqstate, EState *estate,
- Plan *subplan, int epqParam)
+ Plan *subplan, List *auxrowmarks, int epqParam)
{
/* Mark the EPQ state inactive */
epqstate->estate = NULL;
@@ -1636,7 +1700,7 @@ EvalPlanQualInit(EPQState *epqstate, EState *estate,
epqstate->origslot = NULL;
/* ... and remember data that EvalPlanQualBegin will need */
epqstate->plan = subplan;
- epqstate->rowMarks = NIL;
+ epqstate->arowMarks = auxrowmarks;
epqstate->epqParam = epqParam;
}
@@ -1646,25 +1710,14 @@ EvalPlanQualInit(EPQState *epqstate, EState *estate,
* We need this so that ModifyTuple can deal with multiple subplans.
*/
void
-EvalPlanQualSetPlan(EPQState *epqstate, Plan *subplan)
+EvalPlanQualSetPlan(EPQState *epqstate, Plan *subplan, List *auxrowmarks)
{
/* If we have a live EPQ query, shut it down */
EvalPlanQualEnd(epqstate);
/* And set/change the plan pointer */
epqstate->plan = subplan;
-}
-
-/*
- * EvalPlanQualAddRowMark -- add an ExecRowMark that EPQ needs to handle.
- *
- * Currently, only non-locking RowMarks are supported.
- */
-void
-EvalPlanQualAddRowMark(EPQState *epqstate, ExecRowMark *erm)
-{
- if (RowMarkRequiresRowShareLock(erm->markType))
- elog(ERROR, "EvalPlanQual doesn't support locking rowmarks");
- epqstate->rowMarks = lappend(epqstate->rowMarks, erm);
+ /* The rowmarks depend on the plan, too */
+ epqstate->arowMarks = auxrowmarks;
}
/*
@@ -1714,13 +1767,17 @@ EvalPlanQualFetchRowMarks(EPQState *epqstate)
Assert(epqstate->origslot != NULL);
- foreach(l, epqstate->rowMarks)
+ foreach(l, epqstate->arowMarks)
{
- ExecRowMark *erm = (ExecRowMark *) lfirst(l);
+ ExecAuxRowMark *aerm = (ExecAuxRowMark *) lfirst(l);
+ ExecRowMark *erm = aerm->rowmark;
Datum datum;
bool isNull;
HeapTupleData tuple;
+ if (RowMarkRequiresRowShareLock(erm->markType))
+ elog(ERROR, "EvalPlanQual doesn't support locking rowmarks");
+
/* clear any leftover test tuple for this rel */
EvalPlanQualSetTuple(epqstate, erm->rti, NULL);
@@ -1736,7 +1793,7 @@ EvalPlanQualFetchRowMarks(EPQState *epqstate)
Oid tableoid;
datum = ExecGetJunkAttribute(epqstate->origslot,
- erm->toidAttNo,
+ aerm->toidAttNo,
&isNull);
/* non-locked rels could be on the inside of outer joins */
if (isNull)
@@ -1752,7 +1809,7 @@ EvalPlanQualFetchRowMarks(EPQState *epqstate)
/* fetch the tuple's ctid */
datum = ExecGetJunkAttribute(epqstate->origslot,
- erm->ctidAttNo,
+ aerm->ctidAttNo,
&isNull);
/* non-locked rels could be on the inside of outer joins */
if (isNull)
@@ -1777,7 +1834,7 @@ EvalPlanQualFetchRowMarks(EPQState *epqstate)
/* fetch the whole-row Var for the relation */
datum = ExecGetJunkAttribute(epqstate->origslot,
- erm->wholeAttNo,
+ aerm->wholeAttNo,
&isNull);
/* non-locked rels could be on the inside of outer joins */
if (isNull)