aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>2003-08-04 00:43:34 +0000
committerBruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>2003-08-04 00:43:34 +0000
commit089003fb462fcce46c02bf47322b429f73c33c50 (patch)
tree77d78bc3a149df06f5603f60200a6ab363336624 /src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c
parent63354a0228a1dbc4a0d5ddc8ecdd8326349d2100 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-089003fb462fcce46c02bf47322b429f73c33c50.tar.gz
postgresql-089003fb462fcce46c02bf47322b429f73c33c50.zip
pgindent run.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c44
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c
index bc3ecdfeeda..a45e007aff2 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c,v 1.53 2003/07/21 17:05:09 tgl Exp $
+ * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c,v 1.54 2003/08/04 00:43:17 momjian Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
#include "utils/memutils.h"
-static TupleTableSlot *ExecHashJoinOuterGetTuple(PlanState *node,
- HashJoinState *hjstate);
+static TupleTableSlot *ExecHashJoinOuterGetTuple(PlanState * node,
+ HashJoinState *hjstate);
static TupleTableSlot *ExecHashJoinGetSavedTuple(HashJoinState *hjstate,
BufFile *file,
TupleTableSlot *tupleSlot);
@@ -94,10 +94,10 @@ ExecHashJoin(HashJoinState *node)
/*
* If we're doing an IN join, we want to return at most one row per
- * outer tuple; so we can stop scanning the inner scan if we matched on
- * the previous try.
+ * outer tuple; so we can stop scanning the inner scan if we matched
+ * on the previous try.
*/
- if (node->js.jointype == JOIN_IN &&
+ if (node->js.jointype == JOIN_IN &&
node->hj_MatchedOuter)
node->hj_NeedNewOuter = true;
@@ -244,7 +244,10 @@ ExecHashJoin(HashJoinState *node)
}
}
- /* If we didn't return a tuple, may need to set NeedNewOuter */
+ /*
+ * If we didn't return a tuple, may need to set
+ * NeedNewOuter
+ */
if (node->js.jointype == JOIN_IN)
{
node->hj_NeedNewOuter = true;
@@ -365,7 +368,7 @@ ExecInitHashJoin(HashJoin *node, EState *estate)
case JOIN_LEFT:
hjstate->hj_NullInnerTupleSlot =
ExecInitNullTupleSlot(estate,
- ExecGetResultType(innerPlanState(hjstate)));
+ ExecGetResultType(innerPlanState(hjstate)));
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized join type: %d",
@@ -407,10 +410,10 @@ ExecInitHashJoin(HashJoin *node, EState *estate)
hjstate->hj_CurTuple = (HashJoinTuple) NULL;
/*
- * The planner already made a list of the inner hashkeys for us,
- * but we also need a list of the outer hashkeys, as well as a list
- * of the hash operator OIDs. Both lists of exprs must then be prepared
- * for execution.
+ * The planner already made a list of the inner hashkeys for us, but
+ * we also need a list of the outer hashkeys, as well as a list of the
+ * hash operator OIDs. Both lists of exprs must then be prepared for
+ * execution.
*/
hjstate->hj_InnerHashKeys = (List *)
ExecInitExpr((Expr *) hashNode->hashkeys,
@@ -496,7 +499,7 @@ ExecEndHashJoin(HashJoinState *node)
*/
static TupleTableSlot *
-ExecHashJoinOuterGetTuple(PlanState *node, HashJoinState *hjstate)
+ExecHashJoinOuterGetTuple(PlanState * node, HashJoinState *hjstate)
{
HashJoinTable hashtable = hjstate->hj_HashTable;
int curbatch = hashtable->curbatch;
@@ -701,11 +704,11 @@ ExecReScanHashJoin(HashJoinState *node, ExprContext *exprCtxt)
Assert(node->hj_HashTable != NULL);
/*
- * In a multi-batch join, we currently have to do rescans the hard way,
- * primarily because batch temp files may have already been released.
- * But if it's a single-batch join, and there is no parameter change
- * for the inner subnode, then we can just re-use the existing hash
- * table without rebuilding it.
+ * In a multi-batch join, we currently have to do rescans the hard
+ * way, primarily because batch temp files may have already been
+ * released. But if it's a single-batch join, and there is no
+ * parameter change for the inner subnode, then we can just re-use the
+ * existing hash table without rebuilding it.
*/
if (node->hj_HashTable->nbatch == 0 &&
((PlanState *) node)->righttree->chgParam == NULL)
@@ -718,6 +721,7 @@ ExecReScanHashJoin(HashJoinState *node, ExprContext *exprCtxt)
node->hj_hashdone = false;
ExecHashTableDestroy(node->hj_HashTable);
node->hj_HashTable = NULL;
+
/*
* if chgParam of subnode is not null then plan will be re-scanned
* by first ExecProcNode.
@@ -736,8 +740,8 @@ ExecReScanHashJoin(HashJoinState *node, ExprContext *exprCtxt)
node->hj_MatchedOuter = false;
/*
- * if chgParam of subnode is not null then plan will be re-scanned
- * by first ExecProcNode.
+ * if chgParam of subnode is not null then plan will be re-scanned by
+ * first ExecProcNode.
*/
if (((PlanState *) node)->lefttree->chgParam == NULL)
ExecReScan(((PlanState *) node)->lefttree, exprCtxt);