diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2010-07-12 17:01:06 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2010-07-12 17:01:06 +0000 |
commit | 53e757689ce94520f1c53a89dbaa14ea57b09da7 (patch) | |
tree | afa68ba05699223a719104b953bc20f37d4c33d1 /src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c | |
parent | 5a3489357fb61f1ea76412ada33549aca152ad55 (diff) | |
download | postgresql-53e757689ce94520f1c53a89dbaa14ea57b09da7.tar.gz postgresql-53e757689ce94520f1c53a89dbaa14ea57b09da7.zip |
Make NestLoop plan nodes pass outer-relation variables into their inner
relation using the general PARAM_EXEC executor parameter mechanism, rather
than the ad-hoc kluge of passing the outer tuple down through ExecReScan.
The previous method was hard to understand and could never be extended to
handle parameters coming from multiple join levels. This patch doesn't
change the set of possible plans nor have any significant performance effect,
but it's necessary infrastructure for future generalization of the concept
of an inner indexscan plan.
ExecReScan's second parameter is now unused, so it's removed.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c index 4749d353b99..a6cd481f7ed 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ * * * IDENTIFICATION - * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c,v 1.103 2010/01/02 16:57:41 momjian Exp $ + * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c,v 1.104 2010/07/12 17:01:05 tgl Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ ExecHashJoinGetSavedTuple(HashJoinState *hjstate, void -ExecReScanHashJoin(HashJoinState *node, ExprContext *exprCtxt) +ExecReScanHashJoin(HashJoinState *node) { /* * In a multi-batch join, we currently have to do rescans the hard way, @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ ExecReScanHashJoin(HashJoinState *node, ExprContext *exprCtxt) if (node->hj_HashTable != NULL) { if (node->hj_HashTable->nbatch == 1 && - ((PlanState *) node)->righttree->chgParam == NULL) + node->js.ps.righttree->chgParam == NULL) { /* * okay to reuse the hash table; needn't rescan inner, either. @@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ ExecReScanHashJoin(HashJoinState *node, ExprContext *exprCtxt) * if chgParam of subnode is not null then plan will be re-scanned * by first ExecProcNode. */ - if (((PlanState *) node)->righttree->chgParam == NULL) - ExecReScan(((PlanState *) node)->righttree, exprCtxt); + if (node->js.ps.righttree->chgParam == NULL) + ExecReScan(node->js.ps.righttree); } } @@ -900,6 +900,6 @@ ExecReScanHashJoin(HashJoinState *node, ExprContext *exprCtxt) * if chgParam of subnode is not null then plan will be re-scanned by * first ExecProcNode. */ - if (((PlanState *) node)->lefttree->chgParam == NULL) - ExecReScan(((PlanState *) node)->lefttree, exprCtxt); + if (node->js.ps.lefttree->chgParam == NULL) + ExecReScan(node->js.ps.lefttree); } |