diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2005-12-02 20:03:42 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2005-12-02 20:03:42 +0000 |
commit | d780f07ac1ea97e2d3cf906cc1c9d59d6b21c5e2 (patch) | |
tree | e13c3013e4ede366298875eeb77197a07f7c4b54 /src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c | |
parent | 5ab25988753ff495f3fd0b54ef00ba80d0d2808c (diff) | |
download | postgresql-d780f07ac1ea97e2d3cf906cc1c9d59d6b21c5e2.tar.gz postgresql-d780f07ac1ea97e2d3cf906cc1c9d59d6b21c5e2.zip |
Adjust scan plan nodes to avoid getting an extra AccessShareLock on a
relation if it's already been locked by execMain.c as either a result
relation or a FOR UPDATE/SHARE relation. This avoids an extra trip to
the shared lock manager state. Per my suggestion yesterday.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c index f34a14c8596..4beecfbd57f 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ * * * IDENTIFICATION - * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c,v 1.107 2005/11/25 19:47:49 tgl Exp $ + * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c,v 1.108 2005/12/02 20:03:40 tgl Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ @@ -421,12 +421,8 @@ ExecEndIndexScan(IndexScanState *node) /* * close the heap relation. - * - * Currently, we do not release the AccessShareLock acquired by - * ExecInitIndexScan. This lock should be held till end of transaction. - * (There is a faction that considers this too much locking, however.) */ - heap_close(relation, NoLock); + ExecCloseScanRelation(relation); } /* ---------------------------------------------------------------- @@ -464,9 +460,6 @@ IndexScanState * ExecInitIndexScan(IndexScan *node, EState *estate) { IndexScanState *indexstate; - RangeTblEntry *rtentry; - Index relid; - Oid reloid; Relation currentRelation; /* @@ -551,13 +544,9 @@ ExecInitIndexScan(IndexScan *node, EState *estate) } /* - * open the base relation and acquire AccessShareLock on it. + * open the base relation and acquire appropriate lock on it. */ - relid = node->scan.scanrelid; - rtentry = rt_fetch(relid, estate->es_range_table); - reloid = rtentry->relid; - - currentRelation = heap_open(reloid, AccessShareLock); + currentRelation = ExecOpenScanRelation(estate, node->scan.scanrelid); indexstate->ss.ss_currentRelation = currentRelation; indexstate->ss.ss_currentScanDesc = NULL; /* no heap scan here */ @@ -570,7 +559,7 @@ ExecInitIndexScan(IndexScan *node, EState *estate) /* * open the index relation and initialize relation and scan descriptors. * Note we acquire no locks here; the index machinery does its own locks - * and unlocks. (We rely on having AccessShareLock on the parent table to + * and unlocks. (We rely on having a lock on the parent table to * ensure the index won't go away!) */ indexstate->iss_RelationDesc = index_open(node->indexid); |