aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2017-11-02 12:54:22 -0400
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2017-11-02 12:54:55 -0400
commit62a16572d5714bfb19e2a273e61218be6682d3df (patch)
tree12b8e262c778f2df0bd8f5b7d34841de41dcb761 /src
parent5eb8bf2d42676523143c1c76ba584bcdcc584f3e (diff)
downloadpostgresql-62a16572d5714bfb19e2a273e61218be6682d3df.tar.gz
postgresql-62a16572d5714bfb19e2a273e61218be6682d3df.zip
Fix corner-case errors in brin_doupdate().
In some cases the BRIN code releases lock on an index page, and later re-acquires lock and tries to check that the tuple it was working on is still there. That check was a couple bricks shy of a load. It didn't consider that the page might have turned into a "revmap" page. (The samepage code path doesn't call brin_getinsertbuffer(), so it isn't protected by the checks for revmap status there.) It also didn't check whether the tuple offset was now off the end of the linepointer array. Since commit 24992c6db the latter case is pretty common, but at least in principle it could have occurred before that. The net result is that concurrent updates of a BRIN index could fail with errors like "invalid index offnum" or "inconsistent range map". Per report from Tomas Vondra. Back-patch to 9.5, since this code is substantially the same in all versions containing BRIN. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10d2b9f9-f427-03b8-8ad9-6af4ecacbee9@2ndquadrant.com
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/access/brin/brin_pageops.c10
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_pageops.c b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_pageops.c
index 80f803e438e..b0f86f36639 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/brin/brin_pageops.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/brin/brin_pageops.c
@@ -113,9 +113,15 @@ brin_doupdate(Relation idxrel, BlockNumber pagesPerRange,
/*
* Check that the old tuple wasn't updated concurrently: it might have
- * moved someplace else entirely ...
+ * moved someplace else entirely, and for that matter the whole page
+ * might've become a revmap page. Note that in the first two cases
+ * checked here, the "oldlp" we just calculated is garbage; but
+ * PageGetItemId() is simple enough that it was safe to do that
+ * calculation anyway.
*/
- if (!ItemIdIsNormal(oldlp))
+ if (!BRIN_IS_REGULAR_PAGE(oldpage) ||
+ oldoff > PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(oldpage) ||
+ !ItemIdIsNormal(oldlp))
{
LockBuffer(oldbuf, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK);