aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2018-01-23 16:50:35 -0500
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2018-01-23 16:50:35 -0500
commitae3699a6ae55f370bfd7f169a46f89f4aca84f27 (patch)
treecc6ddfec9411a58cd255660495bd2f02ee002fb0 /src
parent2843c01a56eb2116a7cf871d7ed324ed3d5e522e (diff)
downloadpostgresql-ae3699a6ae55f370bfd7f169a46f89f4aca84f27.tar.gz
postgresql-ae3699a6ae55f370bfd7f169a46f89f4aca84f27.zip
Teach reparameterize_path() to handle AppendPaths.
If we're inside a lateral subquery, there may be no unparameterized paths for a particular child relation of an appendrel, in which case we *must* be able to create similarly-parameterized paths for each other child relation, else the planner will fail with "could not devise a query plan for the given query". This means that there are situations where we'd better be able to reparameterize at least one path for each child. This calls into question the assumption in reparameterize_path() that it can just punt if it feels like it. However, the only case that is known broken right now is where the child is itself an appendrel so that all its paths are AppendPaths. (I think possibly I disregarded that in the original coding on the theory that nested appendrels would get folded together --- but that only happens *after* reparameterize_path(), so it's not excused from handling a child AppendPath.) Given that this code's been like this since 9.3 when LATERAL was introduced, it seems likely we'd have heard of other cases by now if there were a larger problem. Per report from Elvis Pranskevichus. Back-patch to 9.3. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5981018.zdth1YWmNy@hammer.magicstack.net
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c23
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/expected/join.out19
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/sql/join.sql10
3 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c
index fc22951e68f..f995a86e85c 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c
@@ -3205,6 +3205,29 @@ reparameterize_path(PlannerInfo *root, Path *path,
spath->path.pathkeys,
required_outer);
}
+ case T_Append:
+ {
+ AppendPath *apath = (AppendPath *) path;
+ List *childpaths = NIL;
+ ListCell *lc;
+
+ /* Reparameterize the children */
+ foreach(lc, apath->subpaths)
+ {
+ Path *spath = (Path *) lfirst(lc);
+
+ spath = reparameterize_path(root, spath,
+ required_outer,
+ loop_count);
+ if (spath == NULL)
+ return NULL;
+ childpaths = lappend(childpaths, spath);
+ }
+ return (Path *)
+ create_append_path(rel, childpaths,
+ required_outer,
+ apath->path.parallel_workers);
+ }
default:
break;
}
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
index eafc933e8f5..1fafca0d2d3 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
@@ -5150,6 +5150,25 @@ select * from
Output: 3
(11 rows)
+-- check handling of nested appendrels inside LATERAL
+select * from
+ ((select 2 as v) union all (select 3 as v)) as q1
+ cross join lateral
+ ((select * from
+ ((select 4 as v) union all (select 5 as v)) as q3)
+ union all
+ (select q1.v)
+ ) as q2;
+ v | v
+---+---
+ 2 | 4
+ 2 | 5
+ 2 | 2
+ 3 | 4
+ 3 | 5
+ 3 | 3
+(6 rows)
+
-- check we don't try to do a unique-ified semijoin with LATERAL
explain (verbose, costs off)
select * from
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
index af6d6129c8f..3b55a1c75ea 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
@@ -1666,6 +1666,16 @@ select * from
select * from (select 3 as z offset 0) z where z.z = x.x
) zz on zz.z = y.y;
+-- check handling of nested appendrels inside LATERAL
+select * from
+ ((select 2 as v) union all (select 3 as v)) as q1
+ cross join lateral
+ ((select * from
+ ((select 4 as v) union all (select 5 as v)) as q3)
+ union all
+ (select q1.v)
+ ) as q2;
+
-- check we don't try to do a unique-ified semijoin with LATERAL
explain (verbose, costs off)
select * from