aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2017-07-17 15:28:16 -0400
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2017-07-17 15:28:16 -0400
commitd46403d2f30327775b1819f84430a573450c9deb (patch)
tree66221d10dcddb88768d77f179f8d2185afc5fbe2 /src
parent220a9b5e55070c9c37017914f456a9a4c6f46145 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-d46403d2f30327775b1819f84430a573450c9deb.tar.gz
postgresql-d46403d2f30327775b1819f84430a573450c9deb.zip
Merge large_object.sql test into largeobject.source.
It seems pretty confusing to have tests named both largeobject and large_object. The latter is of very recent vintage (commit ff992c074), so get rid of it in favor of merging into the former. Also, enable the LO comment test that was added by commit 70ad7ed4e, since the later commit added the then-missing pg_upgrade functionality. The large_object.sql test case is almost completely redundant with that, but not quite: it seems like creating a user-defined LO with an OID in the system range might be an interesting case for pg_upgrade, so let's keep it. Like the earlier patch, back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18665.1500306372@sss.pgh.pa.us
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/expected/large_object.out15
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/input/largeobject.source13
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/output/largeobject.source16
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/output/largeobject_1.source16
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/parallel_schedule2
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/serial_schedule1
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/sql/large_object.sql8
7 files changed, 34 insertions, 37 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/large_object.out b/src/test/regress/expected/large_object.out
deleted file mode 100644
index b00d47cc75e..00000000000
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/large_object.out
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
--- This is more-or-less DROP IF EXISTS LARGE OBJECT 3001;
-WITH unlink AS (SELECT lo_unlink(loid) FROM pg_largeobject WHERE loid = 3001) SELECT 1;
- ?column?
-----------
- 1
-(1 row)
-
--- Test creation of a large object and leave it for testing pg_upgrade
-SELECT lo_create(3001);
- lo_create
------------
- 3001
-(1 row)
-
-COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT 3001 IS 'testing comments';
diff --git a/src/test/regress/input/largeobject.source b/src/test/regress/input/largeobject.source
index 96d75bccfbb..b7a9d052bde 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/input/largeobject.source
+++ b/src/test/regress/input/largeobject.source
@@ -86,10 +86,8 @@ END;
SELECT lo_from_bytea(0, lo_get(loid)) AS newloid FROM lotest_stash_values
\gset
--- Ideally we'd put a comment on this object for pg_dump testing purposes.
--- But since pg_upgrade fails to preserve large object comments, doing so
--- would break pg_upgrade's regression test.
--- COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT :newloid IS 'I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud';
+-- Add a comment to it, as well, for pg_dump/pg_upgrade testing.
+COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT :newloid IS 'I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud';
-- Read out a portion
BEGIN;
@@ -253,6 +251,13 @@ SELECT lo_from_bytea(0, E'\\xdeadbeef') AS newloid
SET bytea_output TO hex;
SELECT lo_get(:newloid);
+-- Create one more object that we leave behind for testing pg_dump/pg_upgrade;
+-- this one intentionally has an OID in the system range
+SELECT lo_create(3001);
+
+COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT 3001 IS 'testing comments';
+
+-- Clean up
DROP TABLE lotest_stash_values;
DROP ROLE regress_lo_user;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/output/largeobject.source b/src/test/regress/output/largeobject.source
index 906a24eac42..e29f5423aa3 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/output/largeobject.source
+++ b/src/test/regress/output/largeobject.source
@@ -90,10 +90,8 @@ END;
-- it's left behind to help test pg_dump.
SELECT lo_from_bytea(0, lo_get(loid)) AS newloid FROM lotest_stash_values
\gset
--- Ideally we'd put a comment on this object for pg_dump testing purposes.
--- But since pg_upgrade fails to preserve large object comments, doing so
--- would break pg_upgrade's regression test.
--- COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT :newloid IS 'I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud';
+-- Add a comment to it, as well, for pg_dump/pg_upgrade testing.
+COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT :newloid IS 'I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud';
-- Read out a portion
BEGIN;
UPDATE lotest_stash_values SET fd=lo_open(loid, CAST(x'20000' | x'40000' AS integer));
@@ -469,5 +467,15 @@ SELECT lo_get(:newloid);
\xdeadbeef
(1 row)
+-- Create one more object that we leave behind for testing pg_dump/pg_upgrade;
+-- this one intentionally has an OID in the system range
+SELECT lo_create(3001);
+ lo_create
+-----------
+ 3001
+(1 row)
+
+COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT 3001 IS 'testing comments';
+-- Clean up
DROP TABLE lotest_stash_values;
DROP ROLE regress_lo_user;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/output/largeobject_1.source b/src/test/regress/output/largeobject_1.source
index cec35d70d59..6fd8cbe0980 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/output/largeobject_1.source
+++ b/src/test/regress/output/largeobject_1.source
@@ -90,10 +90,8 @@ END;
-- it's left behind to help test pg_dump.
SELECT lo_from_bytea(0, lo_get(loid)) AS newloid FROM lotest_stash_values
\gset
--- Ideally we'd put a comment on this object for pg_dump testing purposes.
--- But since pg_upgrade fails to preserve large object comments, doing so
--- would break pg_upgrade's regression test.
--- COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT :newloid IS 'I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud';
+-- Add a comment to it, as well, for pg_dump/pg_upgrade testing.
+COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT :newloid IS 'I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud';
-- Read out a portion
BEGIN;
UPDATE lotest_stash_values SET fd=lo_open(loid, CAST(x'20000' | x'40000' AS integer));
@@ -469,5 +467,15 @@ SELECT lo_get(:newloid);
\xdeadbeef
(1 row)
+-- Create one more object that we leave behind for testing pg_dump/pg_upgrade;
+-- this one intentionally has an OID in the system range
+SELECT lo_create(3001);
+ lo_create
+-----------
+ 3001
+(1 row)
+
+COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT 3001 IS 'testing comments';
+-- Clean up
DROP TABLE lotest_stash_values;
DROP ROLE regress_lo_user;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/parallel_schedule b/src/test/regress/parallel_schedule
index 0d68bcf9a4f..3815182fe7a 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/parallel_schedule
+++ b/src/test/regress/parallel_schedule
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ test: select_into select_distinct select_distinct_on select_implicit select_havi
# ----------
# Another group of parallel tests
# ----------
-test: brin gin gist spgist privileges init_privs security_label collate matview lock replica_identity rowsecurity object_address tablesample groupingsets drop_operator large_object
+test: brin gin gist spgist privileges init_privs security_label collate matview lock replica_identity rowsecurity object_address tablesample groupingsets drop_operator
# ----------
# Another group of parallel tests
diff --git a/src/test/regress/serial_schedule b/src/test/regress/serial_schedule
index 17f1d855bcf..8958d8cdb9d 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/serial_schedule
+++ b/src/test/regress/serial_schedule
@@ -116,7 +116,6 @@ test: object_address
test: tablesample
test: groupingsets
test: drop_operator
-test: large_object
test: alter_generic
test: alter_operator
test: misc
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/large_object.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/large_object.sql
deleted file mode 100644
index a9e18b7c60f..00000000000
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/large_object.sql
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-
--- This is more-or-less DROP IF EXISTS LARGE OBJECT 3001;
-WITH unlink AS (SELECT lo_unlink(loid) FROM pg_largeobject WHERE loid = 3001) SELECT 1;
-
--- Test creation of a large object and leave it for testing pg_upgrade
-SELECT lo_create(3001);
-
-COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT 3001 IS 'testing comments';