aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>2023-01-26 14:50:07 +1300
committerThomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>2023-01-26 14:53:37 +1300
commitd9f5345bf90799a992995d935b712e5040830732 (patch)
tree3614ed8a66bce39f6744ba623ae8dfa724174af9 /src
parent88c27b8fe201fe197ef988f0910f282015ea767c (diff)
downloadpostgresql-d9f5345bf90799a992995d935b712e5040830732.tar.gz
postgresql-d9f5345bf90799a992995d935b712e5040830732.zip
Fix rare sharedtuplestore.c corruption.
If the final chunk of an oversized tuple being written out to disk was exactly 32760 bytes, it would be corrupted due to a fencepost bug. Bug #17619. Back-patch to 11 where the code arrived. While testing that (see test module in archives), I (tmunro) noticed that the per-participant page counter was not initialized to zero as it should have been; that wasn't a live bug when it was written since DSM memory was originally always zeroed, but since 14 min_dynamic_shared_memory might be configured and it supplies non-zeroed memory, so that is also fixed here. Author: Dmitry Astapov <dastapov@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17619-0de62ceda812b8b5%40postgresql.org
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/utils/sort/sharedtuplestore.c5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/sort/sharedtuplestore.c b/src/backend/utils/sort/sharedtuplestore.c
index 996cef07d4f..464d4c5b7fd 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/sort/sharedtuplestore.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/sort/sharedtuplestore.c
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ sts_initialize(SharedTuplestore *sts, int participants,
LWLockInitialize(&sts->participants[i].lock,
LWTRANCHE_SHARED_TUPLESTORE);
sts->participants[i].read_page = 0;
+ sts->participants[i].npages = 0;
sts->participants[i].writing = false;
}
@@ -320,7 +321,7 @@ sts_puttuple(SharedTuplestoreAccessor *accessor, void *meta_data,
/* Do we have space? */
size = accessor->sts->meta_data_size + tuple->t_len;
- if (accessor->write_pointer + size >= accessor->write_end)
+ if (accessor->write_pointer + size > accessor->write_end)
{
if (accessor->write_chunk == NULL)
{
@@ -340,7 +341,7 @@ sts_puttuple(SharedTuplestoreAccessor *accessor, void *meta_data,
}
/* It may still not be enough in the case of a gigantic tuple. */
- if (accessor->write_pointer + size >= accessor->write_end)
+ if (accessor->write_pointer + size > accessor->write_end)
{
size_t written;