aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>2018-07-06 16:38:29 -0400
committerAlvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>2018-07-06 16:38:29 -0400
commitef64645950163e472729eef3af22bfafc477b040 (patch)
treefcbdad2680f5d67d3e7375f52a992498e5cdceb7 /src
parent77cb7eaa78cdc9bd63236aca7f16f1af31b17c98 (diff)
downloadpostgresql-ef64645950163e472729eef3af22bfafc477b040.tar.gz
postgresql-ef64645950163e472729eef3af22bfafc477b040.zip
Allow replication slots to be dropped in single-user mode
Starting with commit 9915de6c1cb2, replication slot drop uses a condition variable sleep to wait until the current user of the slot goes away. This is more user friendly than the previous behavior of erroring out if the slot is in use, but it fails with a not-for-user-consumption error message in single-user mode; plus, if you're using single-user mode because you don't want to start the server in the regular mode (say, disk is full and WAL won't recycle because of the slot), it's inconvenient. Fix by skipping the cond variable sleep in single-user mode, since there can't be anybody to wait for anyway. Reported-by: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3b2f809f-326c-38dd-7a9e-897f957a4eb1@enterprisedb.com
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/replication/slot.c28
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/slot.c b/src/backend/replication/slot.c
index f5927b4d1d3..fb95b44ed82 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/slot.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/slot.c
@@ -351,20 +351,28 @@ retry:
if (s->in_use && strcmp(name, NameStr(s->data.name)) == 0)
{
/*
- * This is the slot we want. We don't know yet if it's active, so
- * get ready to sleep on it in case it is. (We may end up not
- * sleeping, but we don't want to do this while holding the
- * spinlock.)
+ * This is the slot we want; check if it's active under some other
+ * process. In single user mode, we don't need this check.
*/
- ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep(&s->active_cv);
+ if (IsUnderPostmaster)
+ {
+ /*
+ * Get ready to sleep on it in case it is active. (We may end
+ * up not sleeping, but we don't want to do this while holding
+ * the spinlock.)
+ */
+ ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep(&s->active_cv);
- SpinLockAcquire(&s->mutex);
+ SpinLockAcquire(&s->mutex);
- active_pid = s->active_pid;
- if (active_pid == 0)
- active_pid = s->active_pid = MyProcPid;
+ active_pid = s->active_pid;
+ if (active_pid == 0)
+ active_pid = s->active_pid = MyProcPid;
- SpinLockRelease(&s->mutex);
+ SpinLockRelease(&s->mutex);
+ }
+ else
+ active_pid = MyProcPid;
slot = s;
break;