aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/src')
-rw-r--r--doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html4
-rw-r--r--doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml26
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html b/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html
index a2b70a78bc9..edd160c3f77 100644
--- a/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html
+++ b/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ first.
</p>
</li><li>Add GUC to issue notice about queries that use unjoined tables
</li><li>Allow EXPLAIN to identify tables that were skipped because of
- enable_constraint_exclusion
+ constraint_exclusion
</li><li>Allow EXPLAIN output to be more easily processed by scripts
</li><li>CREATE
<ul>
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ first.
</li><li>Allow the creation of indexes with mixed ascending/descending specifiers
</li><li>-<em>Fix incorrect rtree results due to wrong assumptions about "over"</em>
operator semantics
- </li><li>Allow enable_constraint_exclusion to work for UNIONs like it does for
+ </li><li>Allow constraint_exclusion to work for UNIONs like it does for
inheritance, and allow it to work for UPDATE and DELETE queries
</li><li>GIST
<ul>
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml
index 0966b5105e5..a699e0096b2 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--
-$PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml,v 1.346 2005/08/21 03:39:26 tgl Exp $
+$PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml,v 1.347 2005/08/22 17:34:56 momjian Exp $
-->
<chapter Id="runtime">
@@ -2352,24 +2352,24 @@ archive_command = 'copy "%p" /mnt/server/archivedir/"%f"' # Windows
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
- <varlistentry id="guc-enable-constraint-exclusion" xreflabel="enable_constraint_exclusion">
- <term><varname>enable_constraint_exclusion</varname> (<type>boolean</type>)</term>
+ <varlistentry id="guc-constraint-exclusion" xreflabel="constraint_exclusion">
+ <term><varname>constraint_exclusion</varname> (<type>boolean</type>)</term>
<indexterm>
<primary>constraint exclusion</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm>
- <primary><varname>enable_constraint_exclusion</> configuration parameter</primary>
+ <primary><varname>constraint_exclusion</> configuration parameter</primary>
</indexterm>
<listitem>
<para>
- Enables or disables the query planner's use of table constraints.
- The default is <literal>off</>.
+ Enables or disables the query planner's use of table constraints to
+ limit table access. The default is <literal>off</>.
</para>
<para>
When this parameter is <literal>on</>, the planner compares query
- conditions to table CHECK constraints, and omits scanning tables
- for which the conditions contradict the constraints. (Presently
+ conditions with table CHECK constraints, and omits scanning tables
+ where the conditions contradict the constraints. (Presently
this is done only for child tables of inheritance scans.) For
example:
@@ -2387,15 +2387,15 @@ SELECT * FROM parent WHERE key = 2400;
</para>
<para>
- Currently, <varname>enable_constraint_exclusion</> defaults to
- <literal>off</>, because it creates a risk of wrong answers when
- query plans are cached: if a table constraint is changed or dropped,
- the previously generated plan may now be wrong, and there is no
+ Currently, <varname>constraint_exclusion</> defaults to
+ <literal>off</>, because it risks incorrect results if
+ query plans are cached --- if a table constraint is changed or dropped,
+ the previously generated plan might now be wrong, and there is no
built-in mechanism to force re-planning. (This deficiency will
probably be addressed in a future
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> release.) Another reason
for keeping it off is that the constraint checks are relatively
- expensive to make, and in many circumstances will yield no savings.
+ expensive, and in many circumstances will yield no savings.
It is recommended to turn this on only if you are actually using
partitioned tables designed to take advantage of the feature.
</para>