aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/executor/execMain.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/execMain.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/executor/execMain.c224
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 112 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execMain.c b/src/backend/executor/execMain.c
index f470abb6b64..f9cd8d035a1 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/execMain.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/execMain.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execMain.c,v 1.55 1998/09/01 04:28:16 momjian Exp $
+ * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/executor/execMain.c,v 1.56 1998/09/25 13:38:30 thomas Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -168,16 +168,16 @@ ExecutorRun(QueryDesc *queryDesc, EState *estate, int feature, int count)
CommandDest dest;
void (*destination) ();
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* sanity checks
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
Assert(queryDesc != NULL);
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* extract information from the query descriptor
* and the query feature.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
operation = queryDesc->operation;
parseTree = queryDesc->parsetree;
@@ -209,9 +209,9 @@ ExecutorRun(QueryDesc *queryDesc, EState *estate, int feature, int count)
destination);
break;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* retrieve next n "backward" tuples
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
case EXEC_BACK:
result = ExecutePlan(estate,
@@ -223,10 +223,10 @@ ExecutorRun(QueryDesc *queryDesc, EState *estate, int feature, int count)
destination);
break;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* return one tuple but don't "retrieve" it.
* (this is used by the rule manager..) -cim 9/14/89
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
case EXEC_RETONE:
result = ExecutePlan(estate,
@@ -389,40 +389,40 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate)
List *targetList;
int len;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* get information from query descriptor
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
rangeTable = parseTree->rtable;
resultRelation = parseTree->resultRelation;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* initialize the node's execution state
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
estate->es_range_table = rangeTable;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* initialize the BaseId counter so node base_id's
* are assigned correctly. Someday baseid's will have to
* be stored someplace other than estate because they
* should be unique per query planned.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
estate->es_BaseId = 1;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* initialize result relation stuff
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (resultRelation != 0 && operation != CMD_SELECT)
{
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* if we have a result relation, open it and
* initialize the result relation info stuff.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
RelationInfo *resultRelationInfo;
Index resultRelationIndex;
@@ -455,10 +455,10 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate)
resultRelationInfo->ri_IndexRelationDescs = NULL;
resultRelationInfo->ri_IndexRelationInfo = NULL;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* open indices on result relation and save descriptors
* in the result relation information..
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
ExecOpenIndices(resultRelationOid, resultRelationInfo);
@@ -466,9 +466,9 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate)
}
else
{
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* if no result relation, then set state appropriately
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
estate->es_result_relation_info = NULL;
}
@@ -477,9 +477,9 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate)
ExecCheckPerms(operation, resultRelation, rangeTable, parseTree);
#endif
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* initialize the executor "tuple" table.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
{
int nSlots = ExecCountSlotsNode(plan);
@@ -488,33 +488,33 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate)
estate->es_tupleTable = tupleTable;
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* initialize the private state information for
* all the nodes in the query tree. This opens
* files, allocates storage and leaves us ready
* to start processing tuples..
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
ExecInitNode(plan, estate, NULL);
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* get the tuple descriptor describing the type
* of tuples to return.. (this is especially important
* if we are creating a relation with "retrieve into")
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
tupType = ExecGetTupType(plan); /* tuple descriptor */
targetList = plan->targetlist;
len = ExecTargetListLength(targetList); /* number of attributes */
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* now that we have the target list, initialize the junk filter
* if this is a REPLACE or a DELETE query.
* We also init the junk filter if this is an append query
* (there might be some rule lock info there...)
* NOTE: in the future we might want to initialize the junk
* filter for all queries.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
* SELECT added by daveh@insightdist.com 5/20/98 to allow
* ORDER/GROUP BY have an identifier missing from the target.
*/
@@ -551,9 +551,9 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate)
estate->es_junkFilter = NULL;
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* initialize the "into" relation
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
intoRelationDesc = (Relation) NULL;
@@ -571,9 +571,9 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate)
*/
if (parseTree->into != NULL)
{
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* create the "into" relation
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
intoName = parseTree->into;
@@ -587,11 +587,11 @@ InitPlan(CmdType operation, Query *parseTree, Plan *plan, EState *estate)
FreeTupleDesc(tupdesc);
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* XXX rather than having to call setheapoverride(true)
* and then back to false, we should change the
* arguments to heap_open() instead..
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
setheapoverride(true);
@@ -619,22 +619,22 @@ EndPlan(Plan *plan, EState *estate)
RelationInfo *resultRelationInfo;
Relation intoRelationDesc;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* get information from state
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
resultRelationInfo = estate->es_result_relation_info;
intoRelationDesc = estate->es_into_relation_descriptor;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* shut down the query
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
ExecEndNode(plan, plan);
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* destroy the executor "tuple" table.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
{
TupleTable tupleTable = (TupleTable) estate->es_tupleTable;
@@ -643,9 +643,9 @@ EndPlan(Plan *plan, EState *estate)
estate->es_tupleTable = NULL;
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* close the result relations if necessary
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (resultRelationInfo != NULL)
{
@@ -654,16 +654,16 @@ EndPlan(Plan *plan, EState *estate)
resultRelationDesc = resultRelationInfo->ri_RelationDesc;
heap_close(resultRelationDesc);
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* close indices on the result relation
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
ExecCloseIndices(resultRelationInfo);
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* close the "into" relation if necessary
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (intoRelationDesc != NULL)
heap_close(intoRelationDesc);
@@ -702,42 +702,42 @@ ExecutePlan(EState *estate,
int current_tuple_count;
TupleTableSlot *result;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* initialize local variables
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
slot = NULL;
current_tuple_count = 0;
result = NULL;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* Set the direction.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
estate->es_direction = direction;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* Loop until we've processed the proper number
* of tuples from the plan..
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
for (;;)
{
if (operation != CMD_NOTIFY)
{
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* Execute the plan and obtain a tuple
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
/* at the top level, the parent of a plan (2nd arg) is itself */
slot = ExecProcNode(plan, plan);
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* if the tuple is null, then we assume
* there is nothing more to process so
* we just return null...
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (TupIsNull(slot))
{
@@ -746,15 +746,15 @@ ExecutePlan(EState *estate,
}
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* if we have a junk filter, then project a new
* tuple with the junk removed.
*
* Store this new "clean" tuple in the place of the
* original tuple.
*
- * Also, extract all the junk ifnormation we need.
- * ----------------
+ * Also, extract all the junk information we need.
+ ******************
*/
if ((junkfilter = estate->es_junkFilter) != (JunkFilter *) NULL)
{
@@ -764,9 +764,9 @@ ExecutePlan(EState *estate,
HeapTuple newTuple;
bool isNull;
- /* ---------------
+ /******************
* extract the 'ctid' junk attribute.
- * ---------------
+ ******************
*/
if (operation == CMD_UPDATE || operation == CMD_DELETE)
{
@@ -786,10 +786,10 @@ ExecutePlan(EState *estate,
tupleid = &tuple_ctid;
}
- /* ---------------
+ /******************
* Finally create a new "clean" tuple with all junk attributes
* removed
- * ---------------
+ ******************
*/
newTuple = ExecRemoveJunk(junkfilter, slot);
@@ -800,12 +800,12 @@ ExecutePlan(EState *estate,
true); /* tuple should be pfreed */
} /* if (junkfilter... */
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* now that we have a tuple, do the appropriate thing
* with it.. either return it to the user, add
* it to a relation someplace, delete it from a
* relation, or modify some of it's attributes.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
switch (operation)
@@ -855,21 +855,21 @@ ExecutePlan(EState *estate,
result = NULL;
break;
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* check our tuple count.. if we've returned the
* proper number then return, else loop again and
* process more tuples..
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
current_tuple_count += 1;
if (numberTuples == current_tuple_count)
break;
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* here, result is either a slot containing a tuple in the case
* of a RETRIEVE or NULL otherwise.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
return result;
}
@@ -892,16 +892,16 @@ ExecRetrieve(TupleTableSlot *slot,
HeapTuple tuple;
TupleDesc attrtype;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* get the heap tuple out of the tuple table slot
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
tuple = slot->val;
attrtype = slot->ttc_tupleDescriptor;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* insert the tuple into the "into relation"
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (estate->es_into_relation_descriptor != NULL)
{
@@ -909,9 +909,9 @@ ExecRetrieve(TupleTableSlot *slot,
IncrAppended();
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* send the tuple to the front end (or the screen)
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
(*printfunc) (tuple, attrtype);
IncrRetrieved();
@@ -938,23 +938,23 @@ ExecAppend(TupleTableSlot *slot,
int numIndices;
Oid newId;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* get the heap tuple out of the tuple table slot
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
tuple = slot->val;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* get information on the result relation
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
resultRelationInfo = estate->es_result_relation_info;
resultRelationDesc = resultRelationInfo->ri_RelationDesc;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* have to add code to preform unique checking here.
* cim -12/1/89
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
/* BEFORE ROW INSERT Triggers */
@@ -976,9 +976,9 @@ ExecAppend(TupleTableSlot *slot,
}
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* Check the constraints of a tuple
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (resultRelationDesc->rd_att->constr)
@@ -995,21 +995,21 @@ ExecAppend(TupleTableSlot *slot,
}
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* insert the tuple
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
newId = heap_insert(resultRelationDesc, /* relation desc */
tuple); /* heap tuple */
IncrAppended();
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* process indices
*
* Note: heap_insert adds a new tuple to a relation. As a side
* effect, the tupleid of the new tuple is placed in the new
* tuple's t_ctid field.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
numIndices = resultRelationInfo->ri_NumIndices;
if (numIndices > 0)
@@ -1038,9 +1038,9 @@ ExecDelete(TupleTableSlot *slot,
RelationInfo *resultRelationInfo;
Relation resultRelationDesc;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* get the result relation information
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
resultRelationInfo = estate->es_result_relation_info;
resultRelationDesc = resultRelationInfo->ri_RelationDesc;
@@ -1057,9 +1057,9 @@ ExecDelete(TupleTableSlot *slot,
return;
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* delete the tuple
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (heap_delete(resultRelationDesc, /* relation desc */
tupleid)) /* item pointer to tuple */
@@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ ExecDelete(TupleTableSlot *slot,
IncrDeleted();
(estate->es_processed)++;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* Note: Normally one would think that we have to
* delete index tuples associated with the
* heap tuple now..
@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ ExecDelete(TupleTableSlot *slot,
* because the vacuum daemon automatically
* opens an index scan and deletes index tuples
* when it finds deleted heap tuples. -cim 9/27/89
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
/* AFTER ROW DELETE Triggers */
@@ -1109,9 +1109,9 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot,
Relation resultRelationDesc;
int numIndices;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* abort the operation if not running transactions
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (IsBootstrapProcessingMode())
{
@@ -1119,25 +1119,25 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot,
return;
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* get the heap tuple out of the tuple table slot
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
tuple = slot->val;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* get the result relation information
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
resultRelationInfo = estate->es_result_relation_info;
resultRelationDesc = resultRelationInfo->ri_RelationDesc;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* have to add code to preform unique checking here.
* in the event of unique tuples, this becomes a deletion
* of the original tuple affected by the replace.
* cim -12/1/89
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
/* BEFORE ROW UPDATE Triggers */
@@ -1159,9 +1159,9 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot,
}
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* Check the constraints of a tuple
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (resultRelationDesc->rd_att->constr)
@@ -1178,13 +1178,13 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot,
}
}
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* replace the heap tuple
*
* Don't want to continue if our heap_replace didn't actually
* do a replace. This would be the case if heap_replace
* detected a non-functional update. -kw 12/30/93
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
if (heap_replace(resultRelationDesc, /* relation desc */
tupleid, /* item ptr of tuple to replace */
@@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot,
IncrReplaced();
(estate->es_processed)++;
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* Note: instead of having to update the old index tuples
* associated with the heap tuple, all we do is form
* and insert new index tuples.. This is because
@@ -1204,10 +1204,10 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot,
* index tuple deletion is done automagically by
* the vaccuum deamon.. All we do is insert new
* index tuples. -cim 9/27/89
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
- /* ----------------
+ /******************
* process indices
*
* heap_replace updates a tuple in the base relation by invalidating
@@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ ExecReplace(TupleTableSlot *slot,
* effect, the tupleid of the new tuple is placed in the new
* tuple's t_ctid field. So we now insert index tuples using
* the new tupleid stored there.
- * ----------------
+ ******************
*/
numIndices = resultRelationInfo->ri_NumIndices;