diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/execExpr.c | 13 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c | 48 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/execPartition.c | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/functions.c | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c | 202 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/spi.c | 7 |
6 files changed, 217 insertions, 70 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execExpr.c b/src/backend/executor/execExpr.c index ffd3ca4e619..728c8d5fda9 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execExpr.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execExpr.c @@ -1107,6 +1107,19 @@ ExecInitExprRec(Expr *node, ExprState *state, break; } + case T_MergeSupportFunc: + { + /* must be in a MERGE, else something messed up */ + if (!state->parent || + !IsA(state->parent, ModifyTableState) || + ((ModifyTableState *) state->parent)->operation != CMD_MERGE) + elog(ERROR, "MergeSupportFunc found in non-merge plan node"); + + scratch.opcode = EEOP_MERGE_SUPPORT_FUNC; + ExprEvalPushStep(state, &scratch); + break; + } + case T_SubscriptingRef: { SubscriptingRef *sbsref = (SubscriptingRef *) node; diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c b/src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c index 7c1f51e2e0a..a25ab7570fe 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c @@ -484,6 +484,7 @@ ExecInterpExpr(ExprState *state, ExprContext *econtext, bool *isnull) &&CASE_EEOP_AGGREF, &&CASE_EEOP_GROUPING_FUNC, &&CASE_EEOP_WINDOW_FUNC, + &&CASE_EEOP_MERGE_SUPPORT_FUNC, &&CASE_EEOP_SUBPLAN, &&CASE_EEOP_AGG_STRICT_DESERIALIZE, &&CASE_EEOP_AGG_DESERIALIZE, @@ -1592,6 +1593,14 @@ ExecInterpExpr(ExprState *state, ExprContext *econtext, bool *isnull) EEO_NEXT(); } + EEO_CASE(EEOP_MERGE_SUPPORT_FUNC) + { + /* too complex/uncommon for an inline implementation */ + ExecEvalMergeSupportFunc(state, op, econtext); + + EEO_NEXT(); + } + EEO_CASE(EEOP_SUBPLAN) { /* too complex for an inline implementation */ @@ -4246,6 +4255,45 @@ ExecEvalGroupingFunc(ExprState *state, ExprEvalStep *op) } /* + * ExecEvalMergeSupportFunc + * + * Returns information about the current MERGE action for its RETURNING list. + */ +void +ExecEvalMergeSupportFunc(ExprState *state, ExprEvalStep *op, + ExprContext *econtext) +{ + ModifyTableState *mtstate = castNode(ModifyTableState, state->parent); + MergeActionState *relaction = mtstate->mt_merge_action; + + if (!relaction) + elog(ERROR, "no merge action in progress"); + + /* Return the MERGE action ("INSERT", "UPDATE", or "DELETE") */ + switch (relaction->mas_action->commandType) + { + case CMD_INSERT: + *op->resvalue = PointerGetDatum(cstring_to_text_with_len("INSERT", 6)); + *op->resnull = false; + break; + case CMD_UPDATE: + *op->resvalue = PointerGetDatum(cstring_to_text_with_len("UPDATE", 6)); + *op->resnull = false; + break; + case CMD_DELETE: + *op->resvalue = PointerGetDatum(cstring_to_text_with_len("DELETE", 6)); + *op->resnull = false; + break; + case CMD_NOTHING: + elog(ERROR, "unexpected merge action: DO NOTHING"); + break; + default: + elog(ERROR, "unrecognized commandType: %d", + (int) relaction->mas_action->commandType); + } +} + +/* * Hand off evaluation of a subplan to nodeSubplan.c */ void diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execPartition.c b/src/backend/executor/execPartition.c index 8ca512db186..64fcb012dbe 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execPartition.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execPartition.c @@ -609,8 +609,8 @@ ExecInitPartitionInfo(ModifyTableState *mtstate, EState *estate, * Build the RETURNING projection for the partition. Note that we didn't * build the returningList for partitions within the planner, but simple * translation of varattnos will suffice. This only occurs for the INSERT - * case or in the case of UPDATE tuple routing where we didn't find a - * result rel to reuse. + * case or in the case of UPDATE/MERGE tuple routing where we didn't find + * a result rel to reuse. */ if (node && node->returningLists != NIL) { @@ -619,12 +619,14 @@ ExecInitPartitionInfo(ModifyTableState *mtstate, EState *estate, List *returningList; /* See the comment above for WCO lists. */ - /* (except no RETURNING support for MERGE yet) */ Assert((node->operation == CMD_INSERT && list_length(node->returningLists) == 1 && list_length(node->resultRelations) == 1) || (node->operation == CMD_UPDATE && list_length(node->returningLists) == + list_length(node->resultRelations)) || + (node->operation == CMD_MERGE && + list_length(node->returningLists) == list_length(node->resultRelations))); /* diff --git a/src/backend/executor/functions.c b/src/backend/executor/functions.c index 6e926ef4eed..539cd0a9991 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/functions.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/functions.c @@ -1662,8 +1662,8 @@ check_sql_fn_retval(List *queryTreeLists, /* * If it's a plain SELECT, it returns whatever the targetlist says. - * Otherwise, if it's INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE with RETURNING, it returns - * that. Otherwise, the function return type must be VOID. + * Otherwise, if it's INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/MERGE with RETURNING, it + * returns that. Otherwise, the function return type must be VOID. * * Note: eventually replace this test with QueryReturnsTuples? We'd need * a more general method of determining the output type, though. Also, it @@ -1681,7 +1681,8 @@ check_sql_fn_retval(List *queryTreeLists, else if (parse && (parse->commandType == CMD_INSERT || parse->commandType == CMD_UPDATE || - parse->commandType == CMD_DELETE) && + parse->commandType == CMD_DELETE || + parse->commandType == CMD_MERGE) && parse->returningList) { tlist = parse->returningList; @@ -1695,7 +1696,7 @@ check_sql_fn_retval(List *queryTreeLists, (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_FUNCTION_DEFINITION), errmsg("return type mismatch in function declared to return %s", format_type_be(rettype)), - errdetail("Function's final statement must be SELECT or INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE RETURNING."))); + errdetail("Function's final statement must be SELECT or INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/MERGE RETURNING."))); return false; /* keep compiler quiet */ } diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c index 9351fbcf494..4abfe82f7fb 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c @@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ * RETURNING tuple after completing each row insert, update, or delete. * It must be called again to continue the operation. Without RETURNING, * we just loop within the node until all the work is done, then - * return NULL. This avoids useless call/return overhead. (MERGE does - * not support RETURNING.) + * return NULL. This avoids useless call/return overhead. */ #include "postgres.h" @@ -85,9 +84,6 @@ typedef struct ModifyTableContext */ TupleTableSlot *planSlot; - /* MERGE specific */ - MergeActionState *relaction; /* MERGE action in progress */ - /* * Information about the changes that were made concurrently to a tuple * being updated or deleted @@ -150,14 +146,15 @@ static TupleTableSlot *ExecMerge(ModifyTableContext *context, HeapTuple oldtuple, bool canSetTag); static void ExecInitMerge(ModifyTableState *mtstate, EState *estate); -static bool ExecMergeMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, - ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, - ItemPointer tupleid, - HeapTuple oldtuple, - bool canSetTag); -static void ExecMergeNotMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, - ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, - bool canSetTag); +static TupleTableSlot *ExecMergeMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, + ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, + ItemPointer tupleid, + HeapTuple oldtuple, + bool canSetTag, + bool *matched); +static TupleTableSlot *ExecMergeNotMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, + ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, + bool canSetTag); /* @@ -977,7 +974,7 @@ ExecInsert(ModifyTableContext *context, if (mtstate->operation == CMD_UPDATE) wco_kind = WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK; else if (mtstate->operation == CMD_MERGE) - wco_kind = (context->relaction->mas_action->commandType == CMD_UPDATE) ? + wco_kind = (mtstate->mt_merge_action->mas_action->commandType == CMD_UPDATE) ? WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK : WCO_RLS_INSERT_CHECK; else wco_kind = WCO_RLS_INSERT_CHECK; @@ -1831,7 +1828,7 @@ ExecCrossPartitionUpdate(ModifyTableContext *context, * additional rechecking, and might end up executing a different * action entirely). */ - if (context->relaction != NULL) + if (mtstate->operation == CMD_MERGE) return *tmresult == TM_Ok; else if (TupIsNull(epqslot)) return true; @@ -2072,7 +2069,7 @@ lreplace: * No luck, a retry is needed. If running MERGE, we do not do so * here; instead let it handle that on its own rules. */ - if (context->relaction != NULL) + if (context->mtstate->operation == CMD_MERGE) return result; /* @@ -2713,6 +2710,7 @@ static TupleTableSlot * ExecMerge(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, ItemPointer tupleid, HeapTuple oldtuple, bool canSetTag) { + TupleTableSlot *rslot = NULL; bool matched; /*----- @@ -2761,19 +2759,18 @@ ExecMerge(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, */ matched = tupleid != NULL || oldtuple != NULL; if (matched) - matched = ExecMergeMatched(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, oldtuple, - canSetTag); + rslot = ExecMergeMatched(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, oldtuple, + canSetTag, &matched); /* - * Either we were dealing with a NOT MATCHED tuple or ExecMergeMatched() - * returned "false", indicating the previously MATCHED tuple no longer - * matches. + * Deal with the NOT MATCHED case (either a NOT MATCHED tuple from the + * join, or a previously MATCHED tuple for which ExecMergeMatched() set + * "matched" to false, indicating that it no longer matches). */ if (!matched) - ExecMergeNotMatched(context, resultRelInfo, canSetTag); + rslot = ExecMergeNotMatched(context, resultRelInfo, canSetTag); - /* No RETURNING support yet */ - return NULL; + return rslot; } /* @@ -2785,8 +2782,8 @@ ExecMerge(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, * We start from the first WHEN MATCHED action and check if the WHEN quals * pass, if any. If the WHEN quals for the first action do not pass, we * check the second, then the third and so on. If we reach to the end, no - * action is taken and we return true, indicating that no further action is - * required for this tuple. + * action is taken and "matched" is set to true, indicating that no further + * action is required for this tuple. * * If we do find a qualifying action, then we attempt to execute the action. * @@ -2795,16 +2792,18 @@ ExecMerge(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, * with individual actions are evaluated by this routine via ExecQual, while * EvalPlanQual checks for the join quals. If EvalPlanQual tells us that the * updated tuple still passes the join quals, then we restart from the first - * action to look for a qualifying action. Otherwise, we return false -- - * meaning that a NOT MATCHED action must now be executed for the current - * source tuple. + * action to look for a qualifying action. Otherwise, "matched" is set to + * false -- meaning that a NOT MATCHED action must now be executed for the + * current source tuple. */ -static bool +static TupleTableSlot * ExecMergeMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, - ItemPointer tupleid, HeapTuple oldtuple, bool canSetTag) + ItemPointer tupleid, HeapTuple oldtuple, bool canSetTag, + bool *matched) { ModifyTableState *mtstate = context->mtstate; - TupleTableSlot *newslot; + TupleTableSlot *newslot = NULL; + TupleTableSlot *rslot = NULL; EState *estate = context->estate; ExprContext *econtext = mtstate->ps.ps_ExprContext; bool isNull; @@ -2815,7 +2814,10 @@ ExecMergeMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, * If there are no WHEN MATCHED actions, we are done. */ if (resultRelInfo->ri_matchedMergeAction == NIL) - return true; + { + *matched = true; + return NULL; + } /* * Make tuple and any needed join variables available to ExecQual and @@ -2905,12 +2907,15 @@ lmerge_matched: */ newslot = ExecProject(relaction->mas_proj); - context->relaction = relaction; + mtstate->mt_merge_action = relaction; if (!ExecUpdatePrologue(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, NULL, newslot, &result)) { if (result == TM_Ok) - return true; /* "do nothing" */ + { + *matched = true; + return NULL; /* "do nothing" */ + } break; /* concurrent update/delete */ } @@ -2920,7 +2925,10 @@ lmerge_matched: { if (!ExecIRUpdateTriggers(estate, resultRelInfo, oldtuple, newslot)) - return true; /* "do nothing" */ + { + *matched = true; + return NULL; /* "do nothing" */ + } } else { @@ -2933,12 +2941,15 @@ lmerge_matched: * cross-partition update was done, then there's nothing * else for us to do --- the UPDATE has been turned into a * DELETE and an INSERT, and we must not perform any of - * the usual post-update tasks. + * the usual post-update tasks. Also, the RETURNING tuple + * (if any) has been projected, so we can just return + * that. */ if (updateCxt.crossPartUpdate) { mtstate->mt_merge_updated += 1; - return true; + *matched = true; + return context->cpUpdateReturningSlot; } } @@ -2951,12 +2962,15 @@ lmerge_matched: break; case CMD_DELETE: - context->relaction = relaction; + mtstate->mt_merge_action = relaction; if (!ExecDeletePrologue(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, NULL, NULL, &result)) { if (result == TM_Ok) - return true; /* "do nothing" */ + { + *matched = true; + return NULL; /* "do nothing" */ + } break; /* concurrent update/delete */ } @@ -2966,7 +2980,10 @@ lmerge_matched: { if (!ExecIRDeleteTriggers(estate, resultRelInfo, oldtuple)) - return true; /* "do nothing" */ + { + *matched = true; + return NULL; /* "do nothing" */ + } } else result = ExecDeleteAct(context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, @@ -3046,7 +3063,8 @@ lmerge_matched: * If the tuple was already deleted, return to let caller * handle it under NOT MATCHED clauses. */ - return false; + *matched = false; + return NULL; case TM_Updated: { @@ -3092,13 +3110,19 @@ lmerge_matched: * NOT MATCHED actions. */ if (TupIsNull(epqslot)) - return false; + { + *matched = false; + return NULL; + } (void) ExecGetJunkAttribute(epqslot, resultRelInfo->ri_RowIdAttNo, &isNull); if (isNull) - return false; + { + *matched = false; + return NULL; + } /* * When a tuple was updated and migrated to @@ -3133,7 +3157,8 @@ lmerge_matched: * tuple already deleted; tell caller to run NOT * MATCHED actions */ - return false; + *matched = false; + return NULL; case TM_SelfModified: @@ -3161,13 +3186,13 @@ lmerge_matched: /* This shouldn't happen */ elog(ERROR, "attempted to update or delete invisible tuple"); - return false; + return NULL; default: /* see table_tuple_lock call in ExecDelete() */ elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_tuple_lock status: %u", result); - return false; + return NULL; } } @@ -3179,6 +3204,31 @@ lmerge_matched: break; } + /* Process RETURNING if present */ + if (resultRelInfo->ri_projectReturning) + { + switch (commandType) + { + case CMD_UPDATE: + rslot = ExecProcessReturning(resultRelInfo, newslot, + context->planSlot); + break; + + case CMD_DELETE: + rslot = ExecProcessReturning(resultRelInfo, + resultRelInfo->ri_oldTupleSlot, + context->planSlot); + break; + + case CMD_NOTHING: + break; + + default: + elog(ERROR, "unrecognized commandType: %d", + (int) commandType); + } + } + /* * We've activated one of the WHEN clauses, so we don't search * further. This is required behaviour, not an optimization. @@ -3189,19 +3239,22 @@ lmerge_matched: /* * Successfully executed an action or no qualifying action was found. */ - return true; + *matched = true; + + return rslot; } /* * Execute the first qualifying NOT MATCHED action. */ -static void +static TupleTableSlot * ExecMergeNotMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, bool canSetTag) { ModifyTableState *mtstate = context->mtstate; ExprContext *econtext = mtstate->ps.ps_ExprContext; List *actionStates = NIL; + TupleTableSlot *rslot = NULL; ListCell *l; /* @@ -3251,10 +3304,10 @@ ExecMergeNotMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, * so we don't need to map the tuple here. */ newslot = ExecProject(action->mas_proj); - context->relaction = action; + mtstate->mt_merge_action = action; - (void) ExecInsert(context, mtstate->rootResultRelInfo, newslot, - canSetTag, NULL, NULL); + rslot = ExecInsert(context, mtstate->rootResultRelInfo, + newslot, canSetTag, NULL, NULL); mtstate->mt_merge_inserted += 1; break; case CMD_NOTHING: @@ -3270,6 +3323,8 @@ ExecMergeNotMatched(ModifyTableContext *context, ResultRelInfo *resultRelInfo, */ break; } + + return rslot; } /* @@ -3732,9 +3787,17 @@ ExecModifyTable(PlanState *pstate) { EvalPlanQualSetSlot(&node->mt_epqstate, context.planSlot); - ExecMerge(&context, node->resultRelInfo, NULL, NULL, - node->canSetTag); - continue; /* no RETURNING support yet */ + slot = ExecMerge(&context, node->resultRelInfo, + NULL, NULL, node->canSetTag); + + /* + * If we got a RETURNING result, return it to the caller. + * We'll continue the work on next call. + */ + if (slot) + return slot; + + continue; /* continue with the next tuple */ } elog(ERROR, "tableoid is NULL"); @@ -3811,9 +3874,17 @@ ExecModifyTable(PlanState *pstate) { EvalPlanQualSetSlot(&node->mt_epqstate, context.planSlot); - ExecMerge(&context, node->resultRelInfo, NULL, NULL, - node->canSetTag); - continue; /* no RETURNING support yet */ + slot = ExecMerge(&context, node->resultRelInfo, + NULL, NULL, node->canSetTag); + + /* + * If we got a RETURNING result, return it to the + * caller. We'll continue the work on next call. + */ + if (slot) + return slot; + + continue; /* continue with the next tuple */ } elog(ERROR, "ctid is NULL"); @@ -3860,9 +3931,17 @@ ExecModifyTable(PlanState *pstate) { EvalPlanQualSetSlot(&node->mt_epqstate, context.planSlot); - ExecMerge(&context, node->resultRelInfo, NULL, NULL, - node->canSetTag); - continue; /* no RETURNING support yet */ + slot = ExecMerge(&context, node->resultRelInfo, + NULL, NULL, node->canSetTag); + + /* + * If we got a RETURNING result, return it to the + * caller. We'll continue the work on next call. + */ + if (slot) + return slot; + + continue; /* continue with the next tuple */ } elog(ERROR, "wholerow is NULL"); @@ -3924,7 +4003,6 @@ ExecModifyTable(PlanState *pstate) } slot = ExecGetUpdateNewTuple(resultRelInfo, context.planSlot, oldSlot); - context.relaction = NULL; /* Now apply the update. */ slot = ExecUpdate(&context, resultRelInfo, tupleid, oldtuple, diff --git a/src/backend/executor/spi.c b/src/backend/executor/spi.c index 85857715bd8..a97a7e3bd4e 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/spi.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/spi.c @@ -2032,6 +2032,8 @@ SPI_result_code_string(int code) return "SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER"; case SPI_OK_MERGE: return "SPI_OK_MERGE"; + case SPI_OK_MERGE_RETURNING: + return "SPI_OK_MERGE_RETURNING"; } /* Unrecognized code ... return something useful ... */ sprintf(buf, "Unrecognized SPI code %d", code); @@ -2885,7 +2887,10 @@ _SPI_pquery(QueryDesc *queryDesc, bool fire_triggers, uint64 tcount) res = SPI_OK_UPDATE; break; case CMD_MERGE: - res = SPI_OK_MERGE; + if (queryDesc->plannedstmt->hasReturning) + res = SPI_OK_MERGE_RETURNING; + else + res = SPI_OK_MERGE; break; default: return SPI_ERROR_OPUNKNOWN; |