diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c index dd8586ab4d9..777fab49151 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c @@ -65,6 +65,20 @@ * (XXX is it worth testing likewise for duplicate catcache flush entries? * Probably not.) * + * Many subsystems own higher-level caches that depend on relcache and/or + * catcache, and they register callbacks here to invalidate their caches. + * While building a higher-level cache entry, a backend may receive a + * callback for the being-built entry or one of its dependencies. This + * implies the new higher-level entry would be born stale, and it might + * remain stale for the life of the backend. Many caches do not prevent + * that. They rely on DDL for can't-miss catalog changes taking + * AccessExclusiveLock on suitable objects. (For a change made with less + * locking, backends might never read the change.) The relation cache, + * however, needs to reflect changes from CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY no later + * than the beginning of the next transaction. Hence, when a relevant + * invalidation callback arrives during a build, relcache.c reattempts that + * build. Caches with similar needs could do likewise. + * * If a relcache flush is issued for a system relation that we preload * from the relcache init file, we must also delete the init file so that * it will be rebuilt during the next backend restart. The actual work of |