aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c15
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
index 3d4bc2530c5..6504ec07baa 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
@@ -462,10 +462,14 @@ join_is_legal(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
/*
* Otherwise, the proposed join overlaps the RHS but isn't a valid
* implementation of this SJ. It might still be a legal join,
- * however, if it does not overlap the LHS.
+ * however, if it does not overlap the LHS. But we never allow
+ * violations of the RHS of SEMI or ANTI joins. (In practice,
+ * therefore, only LEFT joins ever allow RHS violation.)
*/
- if (bms_overlap(joinrelids, sjinfo->min_lefthand))
- return false;
+ if (sjinfo->jointype == JOIN_SEMI ||
+ sjinfo->jointype == JOIN_ANTI ||
+ bms_overlap(joinrelids, sjinfo->min_lefthand))
+ return false; /* invalid join path */
/*----------
* If both inputs overlap the RHS, assume that it's OK. Since the
@@ -490,15 +494,14 @@ join_is_legal(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2,
* Set flag here to check at bottom of loop.
*----------
*/
- if (sjinfo->jointype != JOIN_SEMI &&
- bms_overlap(rel1->relids, sjinfo->min_righthand) &&
+ if (bms_overlap(rel1->relids, sjinfo->min_righthand) &&
bms_overlap(rel2->relids, sjinfo->min_righthand))
{
/* both overlap; assume OK */
}
else
{
- /* one overlaps, the other doesn't (or it's a semijoin) */
+ /* one overlaps, the other doesn't */
is_valid_inner = false;
}
}