aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Reduce "Var IS [NOT] NULL" quals during constant foldingRichard Guo12 days
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In commit b262ad440, we introduced an optimization that reduces an IS [NOT] NULL qual on a NOT NULL column to constant true or constant false, provided we can prove that the input expression of the NullTest is not nullable by any outer joins or grouping sets. This deduction happens quite late in the planner, during the distribution of quals to rels in query_planner. However, this approach has some drawbacks: we can't perform any further folding with the constant, and it turns out to be prone to bugs. Ideally, this deduction should happen during constant folding. However, the per-relation information about which columns are defined as NOT NULL is not available at that point. This information is currently collected from catalogs when building RelOptInfos for base or "other" relations. This patch moves the collection of NOT NULL attribute information for relations before pull_up_sublinks, storing it in a hash table keyed by relation OID. It then uses this information to perform the NullTest deduction for Vars during constant folding. This also makes it possible to leverage this information to pull up NOT IN subqueries. Note that this patch does not get rid of restriction_is_always_true and restriction_is_always_false. Removing them would prevent us from reducing some IS [NOT] NULL quals that we were previously able to reduce, because (a) the self-join elimination may introduce new IS NOT NULL quals after constant folding, and (b) if some outer joins are converted to inner joins, previously irreducible NullTest quals may become reducible. Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-bFJ1At4btk5wqbezdu8PLtQ3zv-aiaY3ry9Ymm=jgFQ@mail.gmail.com
* Support for deparsing of ArrayCoerceExpr node in contrib/postgres_fdwAlexander Korotkov2025-07-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | When using a prepared statement to select data from a PostgreSQL foreign table (postgres_fdw) with the "field = ANY($1)" expression, the operation is not pushed down when an implicit type case is applied, and a generic plan is used. This commit resolves the issue by supporting the push-down of ArrayCoerceExpr, which is used in this case. The support is quite straightforward and similar to other nods, such as RelabelType. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4f0cea802476d23c6e799512ffd17aff%40postgrespro.ru Author: Alexander Pyhalov <a.pyhalov@postgrespro.ru> Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
* Revert "postgres_fdw: Inherit the local transaction's access/deferrable modes."Etsuro Fujita2025-06-08
| | | | | | | | | | We concluded that commit e5a3c9d9b is a feature rather than a fix; since it was added after feature freeze, revert it. Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Reported-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ed2296f1-1a6b-4932-b870-5bb18c2591ae%40oss.nttdata.com
* postgres_fdw: Inherit the local transaction's access/deferrable modes.Etsuro Fujita2025-06-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, postgres_fdw always 1) opened a remote transaction in READ WRITE mode even when the local transaction was READ ONLY, causing a READ ONLY transaction using it that references a foreign table mapped to a remote view executing a volatile function to write in the remote side, and 2) opened the remote transaction in NOT DEFERRABLE mode even when the local transaction was DEFERRABLE, causing a SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE transaction using it to abort due to a serialization failure in the remote side. To avoid these, modify postgres_fdw to open a remote transaction in the same access/deferrable modes as the local transaction. This commit also modifies it to open a remote subtransaction in the same access mode as the local subtransaction. Although these issues exist since the introduction of postgres_fdw, there have been no reports from the field. So it seems fine to just fix them in master only. Author: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK16n_hcUUWuOdmeUS%2Bw4Q6dZvTEDHb%3DOP%3D5JBzo-M3QmpQ%40mail.gmail.com
* Suppress unnecessary explicit sorting for EPQ mergejoin pathRichard Guo2025-05-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When building a ForeignPath for a joinrel, if there's a possibility that EvalPlanQual will be executed, we must identify a suitable path for EPQ checks. If the outer or inner path of the chosen path is a ForeignPath representing a pushed-down join, we replace it with its fdw_outerpath to ensure that the EPQ check path consists entirely of local joins. If the chosen path is a MergePath, and its outer or inner path is a ForeignPath that is not already well enough ordered, the MergePath will have non-NIL outersortkeys or innersortkeys indicating the desired ordering to be created by an explicit Sort node. If we then replace the outer or inner path with its corresponding fdw_outerpath, and that path is already sufficiently ordered, we end up in an inconsistent state: the MergePath has non-NIL outersortkeys or innersortkeys, and its input path is already properly ordered. This inconsistency can result in an Assert failure or the addition of a redundant Sort node. To fix, check if the new outer or inner path of a MergePath is already properly sorted, and set its outersortkeys or innersortkeys to NIL if so. Bug: #18902 Reported-by: Nikita Kalinin <n.kalinin@postgrespro.ru> Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18902-71c1bed2b9f7c46f@postgresql.org
* oauth: Disallow OAuth connections via postgres_fdw/dblinkJacob Champion2025-04-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A subsequent commit will reclassify oauth_client_secret from dispchar="" to dispchar="*", so that UIs will treat it like a secret. For our FDWs, this change will move that option from SERVER to USER MAPPING, which we need to avoid. But upon further discussion, we don't really want our FDWs to use our builtin Device Authorization flow at all, for several reasons: - the URL and code would be printed to the server logs, not sent over the client connection - tokens are not cached/refreshed, so every single connection has to be manually authorized by a user with a browser - oauth_client_secret needs to belong to the foreign server, but options on SERVER are publicly accessible - all non-superusers would need password_required=false, which is dangerous Future OAuth work can use FDWs as a motivating use case. But for now, disallow all oauth_* connection options for these two extensions. Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250415191435.55.nmisch%40google.com
* postgres_fdw: Avoid pulling up restrict infos from subqueriesAlexander Korotkov2025-03-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Semi-join joins below left/right join are deparsed as subqueries. Thus, we can't refer to subqueries vars from upper relations. This commit avoids pulling conditions from them. Reported-by: Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com> Bug: #18852 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEP4nAzryLd3gwcUpFBAG9MWyDfMRX8ZjuyY2XXjyC_C6k%2B_Zw%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Pyhalov <a.pyhalov@postgrespro.ru> Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> Backpatch-through: 17
* Improve EXPLAIN's display of window functions.Tom Lane2025-03-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Up to now we just punted on showing the window definitions used in a plan, with window function calls represented as "OVER (?)". To improve that, show the window definition implemented by each WindowAgg plan node, and reference their window names in OVER. For nameless window clauses generated by "OVER (...)", assign unique names w1, w2, etc. In passing, re-order the properties shown for a WindowAgg node so that the Run Condition (if any) appears after the Window property and before the Filter (if any). This seems more sensible since the Run Condition is associated with the Window and acts before the Filter. Thanks to David G. Johnston and Álvaro Herrera for design suggestions. Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/144530.1741469955@sss.pgh.pa.us
* postgres_fdw: Extend postgres_fdw_get_connections to return remote backend PID.Fujii Masao2025-03-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit adds a new "remote_backend_pid" output column to the postgres_fdw_get_connections function. It returns the process ID of the remote backend, on the foreign server, handling the connection. This enhancement is useful for troubleshooting, monitoring, and reporting. For example, if a connection is unexpectedly closed by the foreign server, the remote backend's PID can help diagnose the cause. No extension version bump is needed, as commit c297a47c5f already handled it for v18~. Author: Sagar Dilip Shedge <sagar.shedge92@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPhYifF25q5xUQWXETfKwhc0YVa_6+tfG9Kw4bCvCjpCWxYs2A@mail.gmail.com
* EXPLAIN: Always use two fractional digits for row counts.Robert Haas2025-02-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit ddb17e387aa28d61521227377b00f997756b8a27 attempted to avoid confusing users by displaying digits after the decimal point only when nloops > 1, since it's impossible to have a fraction row count after a single iteration. However, this made the regression tests unstable since parallal queries will have nloops>1 for all nodes below the Gather or Gather Merge in normal cases, but if the workers don't start in time and the leader finishes all the work, they will suddenly have nloops==1, making it unpredictable whether the digits after the decimal point would be displayed or not. Although 44cbba9a7f51a3888d5087fc94b23614ba2b81f2 seemed to fix the immediate failures, it may still be the case that there are lower-probability failures elsewhere in the regression tests. Various fixes are possible here. For example, it has previously been proposed that we should try to display the digits after the decimal point only if rows/nloops is an integer, but currently rows is storead as a float so it's not theoretically an exact quantity -- precision could be lost in extreme cases. It has also been proposed that we should try to display the digits after the decimal point only if we're under some sort of construct that could potentially cause looping regardless of whether it actually does. While such ideas are not without merit, this patch adopts the much simpler solution of always display two decimal digits. If that approach stands up to scrutiny from the buildfarm and human users, it spares us the trouble of doing anything more complex; if not, we can reassess. This commit incidentally reverts 44cbba9a7f51a3888d5087fc94b23614ba2b81f2, which should no longer be needed. Author: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Author: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com> Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoazzVHn8sFOMFAEwoqBTDxKT45D7mvkyeHgqtoD2cn58Q@mail.gmail.com
* Virtual generated columnsPeter Eisentraut2025-02-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds a new variant of generated columns that are computed on read (like a view, unlike the existing stored generated columns, which are computed on write, like a materialized view). The syntax for the column definition is ... GENERATED ALWAYS AS (...) VIRTUAL and VIRTUAL is also optional. VIRTUAL is the default rather than STORED to match various other SQL products. (The SQL standard makes no specification about this, but it also doesn't know about VIRTUAL or STORED.) (Also, virtual views are the default, rather than materialized views.) Virtual generated columns are stored in tuples as null values. (A very early version of this patch had the ambition to not store them at all. But so much stuff breaks or gets confused if you have tuples where a column in the middle is completely missing. This is a compromise, and it still saves space over being forced to use stored generated columns. If we ever find a way to improve this, a bit of pg_upgrade cleverness could allow for upgrades to a newer scheme.) The capabilities and restrictions of virtual generated columns are mostly the same as for stored generated columns. In some cases, this patch keeps virtual generated columns more restricted than they might technically need to be, to keep the two kinds consistent. Some of that could maybe be relaxed later after separate careful considerations. Some functionality that is currently not supported, but could possibly be added as incremental features, some easier than others: - index on or using a virtual column - hence also no unique constraints on virtual columns - extended statistics on virtual columns - foreign-key constraints on virtual columns - not-null constraints on virtual columns (check constraints are supported) - ALTER TABLE / DROP EXPRESSION - virtual column cannot have domain type - virtual columns are not supported in logical replication The tests in generated_virtual.sql have been copied over from generated_stored.sql with the keyword replaced. This way we can make sure the behavior is mostly aligned, and the differences can be visible. Some tests for currently not supported features are currently commented out. Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a368248e-69e4-40be-9c07-6c3b5880b0a6@eisentraut.org
* Handle default NULL insertion a little better.Tom Lane2025-01-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a column is omitted in an INSERT, and there's no column default, the code in preptlist.c generates a NULL Const to be inserted. Furthermore, if the column is of a domain type, we wrap the Const in CoerceToDomain, so as to throw a run-time error if the domain has a NOT NULL constraint. That's fine as far as it goes, but there are two problems: 1. We're being sloppy about the type/typmod that the Const is labeled with. It really should have the domain's base type/typmod, since it's the input to CoerceToDomain not the output. This can result in coerce_to_domain inserting a useless length-coercion function (useless because it's being applied to a null). The coercion would typically get const-folded away later, but it'd be better not to create it in the first place. 2. We're not applying expression preprocessing (specifically, eval_const_expressions) to the resulting expression tree. The planner's primary expression-preprocessing pass already happened, so that means the length coercion step and CoerceToDomain node miss preprocessing altogether. This is at the least inefficient, since it means the length coercion and CoerceToDomain will actually be executed for each inserted row, though they could be const-folded away in most cases. Worse, it seems possible that missing preprocessing for the length coercion could result in an invalid plan (for example, due to failing to perform default-function-argument insertion). I'm not aware of any live bug of that sort with core datatypes, and it might be unreachable for extension types as well because of restrictions of CREATE CAST, but I'm not entirely convinced that it's unreachable. Hence, it seems worth back-patching the fix (although I only went back to v14, as the patch doesn't apply cleanly at all in v13). There are several places in the rewriter that are building null domain constants the same way as preptlist.c. While those are before the planner and hence don't have any reachable bug, they're still applying a length coercion that will be const-folded away later, uselessly wasting cycles. Hence, make a utility routine that all of these places can call to do it right. Making this code more careful about the typmod assigned to the generated NULL constant has visible but cosmetic effects on some of the plans shown in contrib/postgres_fdw's regression tests. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1865579.1738113656@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 14
* Add OLD/NEW support to RETURNING in DML queries.Dean Rasheed2025-01-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This allows the RETURNING list of INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE/MERGE queries to explicitly return old and new values by using the special aliases "old" and "new", which are automatically added to the query (if not already defined) while parsing its RETURNING list, allowing things like: RETURNING old.colname, new.colname, ... RETURNING old.*, new.* Additionally, a new syntax is supported, allowing the names "old" and "new" to be changed to user-supplied alias names, e.g.: RETURNING WITH (OLD AS o, NEW AS n) o.colname, n.colname, ... This is useful when the names "old" and "new" are already defined, such as inside trigger functions, allowing backwards compatibility to be maintained -- the interpretation of any existing queries that happen to already refer to relations called "old" or "new", or use those as aliases for other relations, is not changed. For an INSERT, old values will generally be NULL, and for a DELETE, new values will generally be NULL, but that may change for an INSERT with an ON CONFLICT ... DO UPDATE clause, or if a query rewrite rule changes the command type. Therefore, we put no restrictions on the use of old and new in any DML queries. Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jian He and Jeff Davis. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWx0J0-v=Qjc6gXzR=KtsdvAE7Ow=D=mu50AgOe+pvisQ@mail.gmail.com
* postgres_fdw: SCRAM authentication pass-throughPeter Eisentraut2025-01-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This enables SCRAM authentication for postgres_fdw when connecting to a foreign server without having to store a plain-text password on user mapping options. This is done by saving the SCRAM ClientKey and ServeryKey from the client authentication and using those instead of the plain-text password for the server-side SCRAM exchange. The new foreign-server or user-mapping option "use_scram_passthrough" enables this. Co-authored-by: Matheus Alcantara <mths.dev@pm.me> Co-authored-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/27b29a35-9b96-46a9-bc1a-914140869dac@gmail.com
* Enable BUFFERS with EXPLAIN ANALYZE by defaultDavid Rowley2024-12-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The topic of turning EXPLAIN's BUFFERS option on with the ANALYZE option has come up a few times over the past few years. In many ways, doing this seems like a good idea as it may be more obvious to users why a given query is running more slowly than they might expect. Also, from my own (David's) personal experience, I've seen users posting to the mailing lists with two identical plans, one slow and one fast asking why their query is sometimes slow. In many cases, this is due to additional reads. Having BUFFERS on by default may help reduce some of these questions, and if not, make it more obvious to the user before they post, or save a round-trip to the mailing list when additional I/O effort is the cause of the slowness. The general consensus is that we want BUFFERS on by default with ANALYZE. However, there were more than zero concerns raised with doing so. The primary reason against is the additional verbosity, making it harder to read large plans. Another concern was that buffer information isn't always useful so may not make sense to have it on by default. It's currently December, so let's commit this to see if anyone comes forward with a strong objection against making this change. We have over half a year remaining in the v18 cycle where we could still easily consider reverting this if someone were to come forward with a convincing enough reason as to why doing this is a bad idea. There were two patches independently submitted to achieve this goal, one by me and the other by Guillaume. This commit is a mix of both of these patches with some additional work done by me to adjust various additional places in the documentation which include EXPLAIN ANALYZE output. Author: Guillaume Lelarge, David Rowley Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Greg Sabino Mullane, Michael Christofides Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANNMO++W7MM8T0KyXN3ZheXXt-uLVM3aEtZd+WNfZ=obxffUiA@mail.gmail.com
* postgres_fdw: Extend postgres_fdw_get_connections to return user name.Fujii Masao2024-09-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit adds a "user_name" output column to the postgres_fdw_get_connections function, returning the name of the local user mapped to the foreign server for each connection. If a public mapping is used, it returns "public." This helps identify postgres_fdw connections more easily, such as determining which connections are invalid, closed, or used within the current transaction. No extension version bump is needed, as commit c297a47c5f already handled it for v18~. Author: Hayato Kuroda Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b492a935-6c7e-8c08-e485-3c1d64d7d10f@oss.nttdata.com
* Restrict accesses to non-system views and foreign tables during pg_dump.Masahiko Sawada2024-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When pg_dump retrieves the list of database objects and performs the data dump, there was possibility that objects are replaced with others of the same name, such as views, and access them. This vulnerability could result in code execution with superuser privileges during the pg_dump process. This issue can arise when dumping data of sequences, foreign tables (only 13 or later), or tables registered with a WHERE clause in the extension configuration table. To address this, pg_dump now utilizes the newly introduced restrict_nonsystem_relation_kind GUC parameter to restrict the accesses to non-system views and foreign tables during the dump process. This new GUC parameter is added to back branches too, but these changes do not require cluster recreation. Back-patch to all supported branches. Reviewed-by: Noah Misch Security: CVE-2024-7348 Backpatch-through: 12
* postgres_fdw: Add connection status check to postgres_fdw_get_connections().Fujii Masao2024-07-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit extends the postgres_fdw_get_connections() function to check if connections are closed. This is useful for detecting closed postgres_fdw connections that could prevent successful transaction commits. Users can roll back transactions immediately upon detecting closed connections, avoiding unnecessary processing of failed transactions. This feature is available only on systems supporting the non-standard POLLRDHUP extension to the poll system call, including Linux. Author: Hayato Kuroda Reviewed-by: Shinya Kato, Zhihong Yu, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Andres Freund Reviewed-by: Onder Kalaci, Takamichi Osumi, Vignesh C, Tom Lane, Ted Yu Reviewed-by: Katsuragi Yuta, Peter Smith, Shubham Khanna, Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB58662809E678253B90E82CE5F5889@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
* postgres_fdw: Add "used_in_xact" column to postgres_fdw_get_connections().Fujii Masao2024-07-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit extends the postgres_fdw_get_connections() function to include a new used_in_xact column, indicating whether each connection is used in the current transaction. This addition is particularly useful for the upcoming feature that will check if connections are closed. By using those information, users can verify if postgres_fdw connections used in a transaction remain open. If any connection is closed, the transaction cannot be committed successfully. In this case users can roll back it immediately without waiting for transaction end. The SQL API for postgres_fdw_get_connections() is updated by this commit and may change in the future. To handle compatibility with older SQL declarations, an API versioning system is introduced, allowing the function to behave differently based on the API version. Author: Hayato Kuroda Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/be9382f7-5072-4760-8b3f-31d6dffa8d62@oss.nttdata.com
* postgres_fdw: Split out the query_cancel test to its own fileAlvaro Herrera2024-07-22
| | | | | | | | | | This allows us to skip it in Cygwin, where it's reportedly flaky because of platform bugs or something. Backpatch to 17, where the test was introduced by commit 2466d6654f85. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e4d0cb33-6be5-e4d5-ae49-9eac3ff2b005@gmail.com
* postgres_fdw: Avoid "cursor can only scan forward" error.Etsuro Fujita2024-07-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit d844cd75a disallowed rewind in a non-scrollable cursor to resolve anomalies arising from such a cursor operation. However, this failed to take into account the assumption in postgres_fdw that when rescanning a foreign relation, it can rewind the cursor created for scanning the foreign relation without specifying the SCROLL option, regardless of its scrollability, causing this error when it tried to do such a rewind in a non-scrollable cursor. Fix by modifying postgres_fdw to instead recreate the cursor, regardless of its scrollability, when rescanning the foreign relation. (If we had a way to check its scrollability, we could improve this by rewinding it if it is scrollable and recreating it if not, but we do not have it, so this commit modifies it to recreate it in any case.) Per bug #17889 from Eric Cyr. Devrim Gunduz also reported this problem. Back-patch to v15 where that commit enforced the prohibition. Reviewed by Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17889-e8c39a251d258dda%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b415ac3255f8352d1ea921cf3b7ba39e0587768a.camel%40gunduz.org
* Check lateral references within PHVs for memoize cache keysRichard Guo2024-07-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If we intend to generate a Memoize node on top of a path, we need cache keys of some sort. Currently we search for the cache keys in the parameterized clauses of the path as well as the lateral_vars of its parent. However, it turns out that this is not sufficient because there might be lateral references derived from PlaceHolderVars, which we fail to take into consideration. This oversight can cause us to miss opportunities to utilize the Memoize node. Moreover, in some plans, failing to recognize all the cache keys could result in performance regressions. This is because without identifying all the cache keys, we would need to purge the entire cache every time we get a new outer tuple during execution. This patch fixes this issue by extracting lateral Vars from within PlaceHolderVars and subsequently including them in the cache keys. In passing, this patch also includes a comment clarifying that Memoize nodes are currently not added on top of join relation paths. This explains why this patch only considers PlaceHolderVars that are due to be evaluated at baserels. Author: Richard Guo Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, David Rowley, Andrei Lepikhov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48jLxn0pAPZpJ50EThZ569Xrw+=4Ac3QvkpQvNszbeoNg@mail.gmail.com
* Support "Right Semi Join" plan shapesRichard Guo2024-07-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Hash joins can support semijoin with the LHS input on the right, using the existing logic for inner join, combined with the assurance that only the first match for each inner tuple is considered, which can be achieved by leveraging the HEAP_TUPLE_HAS_MATCH flag. This can be very useful in some cases since we may now have the option to hash the smaller table instead of the larger. Merge join could likely support "Right Semi Join" too. However, the benefit of swapping inputs tends to be small here, so we do not address that in this patch. Note that this patch also modifies a test query in join.sql to ensure it continues testing as intended. With this patch the original query would result in a right-semi-join rather than semi-join, compromising its original purpose of testing the fix for neqjoinsel's behavior for semi-joins. Author: Richard Guo Reviewed-by: wenhui qiu, Alena Rybakina, Japin Li Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_X1mN=ic+SxcyymUqFx9bB8pqSLTGJ-F=MHy4PW3eRXw@mail.gmail.com
* postgres_fdw: Refuse to send FETCH FIRST WITH TIES to remote servers.Etsuro Fujita2024-06-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, when considering LIMIT pushdown, postgres_fdw failed to check whether the query has this clause, which led to pushing false LIMIT clauses, causing incorrect results. This clause has been supported since v13, so we need to do a remote-version check before deciding that it will be safe to push such a clause, but we do not currently have a way to do the check (without accessing the remote server); disable pushing such a clause for now. Oversight in commit 357889eb1. Back-patch to v13, where that commit added the support. Per bug #18467 from Onder Kalaci. Patch by Japin Li, per a suggestion from Tom Lane, with some changes to the comments by me. Review by Onder Kalaci, Alvaro Herrera, and me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18467-7bb89084ff03a08d%40postgresql.org
* Re-allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION.Robert Haas2024-05-21
| | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 7204f35919b7e021e8d1bc9f2d76fd6bfcdd2070, thus restoring 66c0185a3 (Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION) as well as the follow-on commits d5d2205c8, 3b1a7eb28, 7487044d6. Per further discussion on pgsql-release, we wish to ship beta1 with this feature, and patch the bug that was found just before wrap, rather than shipping beta1 with the feature reverted.
* Revert commit 66c0185a3 and follow-on patches.Tom Lane2024-05-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts 66c0185a3 (Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION) as well as the follow-on commits d5d2205c8, 3b1a7eb28, 7487044d6. In addition to those, 07746a8ef had to be removed then re-applied in a different place, because 66c0185a3 moved the relevant code. The reason for this last-minute thrashing is that depesz found a case in which the patched code creates a completely wrong plan that silently gives incorrect query results. It's unclear what the cause is or how many cases are affected, but with beta1 wrap staring us in the face, there's no time for closer investigation. After we figure that out, we can decide whether to un-revert this for beta2 or hold it for v18. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zktzf926vslR35Fv@depesz.com (also some private discussion among pgsql-release)
* Stabilize postgres_fdw testAlvaro Herrera2024-03-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The test fails when RESET statement_timeout takes longer than 10ms. Avoid the problem by using SET LOCAL instead. Overall, this test is not ideal: 10ms could be shorter than the time to have sent the query to the "remote" server, so it's possible that on some machines this test doesn't actually witness a remote query being cancelled. We may want to improve on this someday by using some other testing technique, but for now it's better than nothing. I verified manually that one round of remote cancellation occurs when this runs on my machine. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQRsdWnj=YaaPCnA8d7E1AdbxRPBYmyBQRMPUijR2MpM_w@mail.gmail.com
* libpq-be-fe-helpers.h: wrap new cancel APIsAlvaro Herrera2024-03-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 61461a300c1c introduced new functions to libpq for cancelling queries. This commit introduces a helper function that backend-side libraries and extensions can use to invoke those. This function takes a timeout and can itself be interrupted while it is waiting for a cancel request to be sent and processed, instead of being blocked. This replaces the usage of the old functions in postgres_fdw and dblink. Finally, it also adds some test coverage for the cancel support in postgres_fdw. Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQT_VgOWWENUqvUV9xQmbaCyXjtRRAYO8W07oqashk_N+g@mail.gmail.com
* Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNIONDavid Rowley2024-03-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Until now, UNION queries have often been suboptimal as the planner has only ever considered using an Append node and making the results unique by either using a Hash Aggregate, or by Sorting the entire Append result and running it through the Unique operator. Both of these methods always require reading all rows from the union subqueries. Here we adjust the union planner so that it can request that each subquery produce results in target list order so that these can be Merge Appended together and made unique with a Unique node. This can improve performance significantly as the union child can make use of the likes of btree indexes and/or Merge Joins to provide the top-level UNION with presorted input. This is especially good if the top-level UNION contains a LIMIT node that limits the output rows to a small subset of the unioned rows as cheap startup plans can be used. Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Andy Fan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpb_63XQodmxKUF8vb9M7CxyUyT4sWvEgqeQU-GB7QFoQ@mail.gmail.com
* Improve EXPLAIN's display of SubPlan nodes and output parameters.Tom Lane2024-03-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Historically we've printed SubPlan expression nodes as "(SubPlan N)", which is pretty uninformative. Trying to reproduce the original SQL for the subquery is still as impractical as before, and would be mighty verbose as well. However, we can still do better than that. Displaying the "testexpr" when present, and adding a keyword to indicate the SubLinkType, goes a long way toward showing what's really going on. In addition, this patch gets rid of EXPLAIN's use of "$n" to represent subplan and initplan output Params. Instead we now print "(SubPlan N).colX" or "(InitPlan N).colX" to represent the X'th output column of that subplan. This eliminates confusion with the use of "$n" to represent PARAM_EXTERN Params, and it's useful for the first part of this change because it eliminates needing some other indication of which subplan is referenced by a SubPlan that has a testexpr. In passing, this adds simple regression test coverage of the ROWCOMPARE_SUBLINK code paths, which were entirely unburdened by testing before. Tom Lane and Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Aleksander Alekseev. Thanks to Chantal Keller for raising the question of whether this area couldn't be improved. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2838538.1705692747@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix deparsing of Consts in postgres_fdw ORDER BYDavid Rowley2024-03-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For UNION ALL queries where a union child query contained a foreign table, if the targetlist of that query contained a constant, and the top-level query performed an ORDER BY which contained the column for the constant value, then postgres_fdw would find the EquivalenceMember with the Const and then try to produce an ORDER BY containing that Const. This caused problems with INT typed Consts as these could appear to be requests to order by an ordinal column position rather than the constant value. This could lead to either an error such as: ERROR: ORDER BY position <int const> is not in select list or worse, if the constant value is a valid column, then we could just sort by the wrong column altogether. Here we fix this issue by just not including these Consts in the ORDER BY clause. In passing, add a new section for testing ORDER BY in the postgres_fdw tests and move two existing tests which were misplaced in the WHERE clause testing section into it. Reported-by: Michał Kłeczek Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Richard Guo Bug: #18381 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0714C8B8-8D82-4ABB-9F8D-A0C3657E7B6E%40kleczek.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18381-137456acd168bf93%40postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
* Pull up ANY-SUBLINK with the necessary lateral support.Alexander Korotkov2024-02-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For ANY-SUBLINK, we adopted a two-stage pull-up approach to handle different types of scenarios. In the first stage, the sublink is pulled up as a subquery. Because of this, when writing this code, we did not have the ability to perform lateral joins, and therefore, we were unable to pull up Var with varlevelsup=1. Now that we have the ability to use lateral joins, we can eliminate this limitation. Author: Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> Reviewed-by: Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
* Add better handling of redundant IS [NOT] NULL qualsDavid Rowley2024-01-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Until now PostgreSQL has not been very smart about optimizing away IS NOT NULL base quals on columns defined as NOT NULL. The evaluation of these needless quals adds overhead. Ordinarily, anyone who came complaining about that would likely just have been told to not include the qual in their query if it's not required. However, a recent bug report indicates this might not always be possible. Bug 17540 highlighted that when we optimize Min/Max aggregates the IS NOT NULL qual that the planner adds to make the rewritten plan ignore NULLs can cause issues with poor index choice. That particular case demonstrated that other quals, especially ones where no statistics are available to allow the planner a chance at estimating an approximate selectivity for can result in poor index choice due to cheap startup paths being prefered with LIMIT 1. Here we take generic approach to fixing this by having the planner check for NOT NULL columns and just have the planner remove these quals (when they're not needed) for all queries, not just when optimizing Min/Max aggregates. Additionally, here we also detect IS NULL quals on a NOT NULL column and transform that into a gating qual so that we don't have to perform the scan at all. This also works for join relations when the Var is not nullable by any outer join. This also helps with the self-join removal work as it must replace strict join quals with IS NOT NULL quals to ensure equivalence with the original query. Author: David Rowley, Richard Guo, Andy Fan Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqg6XZDhYRPz0zgOcevSMo0d3vxA9DvHrZtKfqO30WTnw@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17540-7aa1855ad5ec18b4%40postgresql.org
* Fix typos in comments and in one isolation test.Robert Haas2024-01-02
| | | | | | | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker, reviewed by Shubham Khanna. Some subtractions by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/87le9fmi01.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
* Add support for deparsing semi-joins to contrib/postgres_fdwAlexander Korotkov2023-12-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SEMI-JOIN is deparsed as the EXISTS subquery. It references outer and inner relations, so it should be evaluated as the condition in the upper-level WHERE clause. The signatures of deparseFromExprForRel() and deparseRangeTblRef() are revised so that they can add conditions to the upper level. PgFdwRelationInfo now has a hidden_subquery_rels field, referencing the relids used in the inner parts of semi-join. They can't be referred to from upper relations and should be used internally for equivalence member searches. The planner can create semi-join, which refers to inner rel vars in its target list. However, we deparse semi-join as an exists() subquery. So we skip the case when the target list references to inner rel of semi-join. Author: Alexander Pyhalov Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Ian Lawrence Barwick, Yuuki Fujii, Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c9e2a757cf3ac2333714eaf83a9cc184@postgrespro.ru
* Improve "user mapping not found" error messagePeter Eisentraut2023-11-30
| | | | | | | | | | Display the name of the foreign server for which the user mapping was not found. Author: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAB8KJ=jFzNaeyFtLcTZNOc6fd1+F93pGVLFa-wyt31wn7VNxqQ@mail.gmail.com
* Use ResourceOwner to track WaitEventSets.Heikki Linnakangas2023-11-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A WaitEventSet holds file descriptors or event handles (on Windows). If FreeWaitEventSet is not called, those fds or handles are leaked. Use ResourceOwners to track WaitEventSets, to clean those up automatically on error. This was a live bug in async Append nodes, if a FDW's ForeignAsyncRequest function failed. (In back branches, I will apply a more localized fix for that based on PG_TRY-PG_FINALLY.) The added test doesn't check for leaking resources, so it passed even before this commit. But at least it covers the code path. In the passing, fix misleading comment on what the 'nevents' argument to WaitEventSetWait means. Report by Alexander Lakhin, analysis and suggestion for the fix by Tom Lane. Fixes bug #17828. Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Thomas Munro Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/472235.1678387869@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Stabilize postgres_fdw tests on 32-bit machinesDavid Rowley2023-11-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | cac169d68 adjusted DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST and that seems to have caused a test to become unstable on 32-bit machines. 4b14e1871 tried to fix this as originally the plan was flipping between a Nested Loop and Hash Join. That commit forced the Nested Loop, but there's still flexibility to push or not push the sort to the remote server and 32-bit seems to prefer to push and on 64-bit, the costs prefer not to. Here let's just turn off enable_sort to significantly encourage the sort to take place on the remote server. Reported-by: Michael Paquier, Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZUM2IhA8X2lrG50K@paquier.xyz
* Attempt to stabilize postgres_fdw testsDavid Rowley2023-11-02
| | | | | | | | | cac169d68 adjusted DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST and that seems to have caused a test to become unstable on 32-bit machines. Try to make it stable again. Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZUM2IhA8X2lrG50K@paquier.xyz
* Increase DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST from 0.01 to 0.2David Rowley2023-11-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.01 was unrealistically low as it's the same as the default cpu_tuple_cost and 10x cheaper than the default parallel_tuple_cost. It's hard to imagine a situation where fetching a tuple from a foreign server would be cheaper than fetching one from a parallel worker. After some experimentation on a loopback server, somewhere between 0.15 and 0.3 seems more realistic. Here we split the difference and set it to 0.2. This will cause operations that reduce the number of tuples (e.g. aggregation) to be more likely to take place on the foreign server. Adjusting this causes some plan changes in the postgres_fdw regression tests. This is because penalizing each Path with the additional tuple costs causes some dilution of the costs of the other operations being charged for and results in various paths appearing to be closer to the same costs such that add_path's STD_FUZZ_FACTOR is more likely to see two paths as costing (fuzzily) the same. This isn't ideal, but it shouldn't be reason enough to use artificially low costs. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvopVjjfh5c1Ed2HRvDdfom2dEpMwwiu5-f1AnmYprJngA@mail.gmail.com
* postgres_fdw: Fix test for parameterized foreign scan.Etsuro Fujita2023-08-30
| | | | | | | | | Commit e4106b252 should have updated this test, but did not; back-patch to all supported branches. Reviewed by Richard Guo. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK15nR0NXLSCKQAcqbZbTzrzd5MozowWnTnGfPkayndF43Q%40mail.gmail.com
* Re-allow FDWs and custom scan providers to replace joins with pseudoconstant ↵Etsuro Fujita2023-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | quals. This was disabled in commit 6f80a8d9c due to the lack of support for handling of pseudoconstant quals assigned to replaced joins in createplan.c. To re-allow it, this patch adds the support by 1) modifying the ForeignPath and CustomPath structs so that if they represent foreign and custom scans replacing a join with a scan, they store the list of RestrictInfo nodes to apply to the join, as in JoinPaths, and by 2) modifying create_scan_plan() in createplan.c so that it uses that list in that case, instead of the baserestrictinfo list, to get pseudoconstant quals assigned to the join, as mentioned in the commit message for that commit. Important item for the release notes: this is non-backwards-compatible since it modifies the ForeignPath and CustomPath structs, as mentioned above, and changes the argument lists for FDW helper functions create_foreignscan_path(), create_foreign_join_path(), and create_foreign_upper_path(). Richard Guo, with some additional changes by me, reviewed by Nishant Sharma, Suraj Kharage, and Richard Guo. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADrsxdbcN1vejBaf8a%2BQhrZY5PXL-04mCd4GDu6qm6FigDZd6Q%40mail.gmail.com
* Disallow replacing joins with scans in problematic cases.Etsuro Fujita2023-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit e7cb7ee14, which introduced the infrastructure for FDWs and custom scan providers to replace joins with scans, failed to add support handling of pseudoconstant quals assigned to replaced joins in createplan.c, leading to an incorrect plan without a gating Result node when postgres_fdw replaced a join with such a qual. To fix, we could add the support by 1) modifying the ForeignPath and CustomPath structs to store the list of RestrictInfo nodes to apply to the join, as in JoinPaths, if they represent foreign and custom scans replacing a join with a scan, and by 2) modifying create_scan_plan() in createplan.c to use that list in that case, instead of the baserestrictinfo list, to get pseudoconstant quals assigned to the join; but #1 would cause an ABI break. So fix by modifying the infrastructure to just disallow replacing joins with such quals. Back-patch to all supported branches. Reported by Nishant Sharma. Patch by me, reviewed by Nishant Sharma and Richard Guo. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADrsxdbcN1vejBaf8a%2BQhrZY5PXL-04mCd4GDu6qm6FigDZd6Q%40mail.gmail.com
* Remove expensive test of postgres_fdw batch insertsTomas Vondra2023-07-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The test inserted 70k rows into a foreign table, in order to verify correct behavior with more than 65535 parameters, and was added in response to a bug report. However, this is rather expensive, especially when running the tests under valgrind, CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS etc. It doesn't seem worth it to keep running the test, so remove it from all branches (14+). Backpatch-through: 14 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2131017.1623451468@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Add a test case for a316a3bcAmit Langote2023-06-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | a316a3bc fixed the code in build_simpl_rel() that propagates RelOptInfo.userid from parent to child rels so that it works correctly for the child rels of a UNION ALL subquery rel, though no tests were added in that commit. So do so here. As noted in the discussion, coming up with a test case in the core regression suite for this fix has turned out to be tricky, so the test case is added to the postgres_fdw's suite instead. postgresGetForeignRelSize()'s use of user mapping for the user specified in RelOptInfo.userid makes it relatively easier to craft a test case around. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BHiwqH91GaFNXcXbLAM9L%3DzBwUmSyv699Mtv3i1_xtk9Xec_A%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 16
* Expand some more uses of "deleg" to "delegation" or "delegated".Tom Lane2023-05-21
| | | | | | | | | | Complete the task begun in 9c0a0e2ed: we don't want to use the abbreviation "deleg" for GSS delegation in any user-visible places. (For consistency, this also changes most internal uses too.) Abhijit Menon-Sen and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/949048.1684639317@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix buffer refcount leak with FDW bulk insertsMichael Paquier2023-04-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The leak would show up when using batch inserts with foreign tables included in a partition tree, as the slots used in the batch were not reset once processed. In order to fix this problem, some ExecClearTuple() are added to clean up the slots used once a batch is filled and processed, mapping with the number of slots currently in use as tracked by the counter ri_NumSlots. This buffer refcount leak has been introduced in b676ac4 with the addition of the executor facility to improve bulk inserts for FDWs, so backpatch down to 14. Alexander has provided the patch (slightly modified by me). The test for postgres_fdw comes from me, based on the test case that the author has sent in the report. Author: Alexander Pyhalov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b035780a740efd38dc30790c76927255@postgrespro.ru Backpatch-through: 14
* De-Revert "Add support for Kerberos credential delegation"Stephen Frost2023-04-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 3d03b24c3 (Revert Add support for Kerberos credential delegation) which was committed on the grounds of concern about portability, but on further review and discussion, it's clear that we are better off explicitly requiring MIT Kerberos as that appears to be the only GSSAPI library currently that's under proper maintenance and ongoing development. The API used for storing credentials was added to MIT Kerberos over a decade ago while for the other libraries which appear to be mainly based on Heimdal, which exists explicitly to be a re-implementation of MIT Kerberos, the API never made it to a released version (even though it was added to the Heimdal git repo over 5 years ago..). This post-feature-freeze change was approved by the RMT. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZDDO6jaESKaBgej0%40tamriel.snowman.net
* Revert "Add support for Kerberos credential delegation"Stephen Frost2023-04-08
| | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 3d4fa227bce4294ce1cc214b4a9d3b7caa3f0454. Per discussion and buildfarm, this depends on APIs that seem to not be available on at least one platform (NetBSD). Should be certainly possible to rework to be optional on that platform if necessary but bit late for that at this point. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3286097.1680922218@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Add support for Kerberos credential delegationStephen Frost2023-04-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Support GSSAPI/Kerberos credentials being delegated to the server by a client. With this, a user authenticating to PostgreSQL using Kerberos (GSSAPI) credentials can choose to delegate their credentials to the PostgreSQL server (which can choose to accept them, or not), allowing the server to then use those delegated credentials to connect to another service, such as with postgres_fdw or dblink or theoretically any other service which is able to be authenticated using Kerberos. Both postgres_fdw and dblink are changed to allow non-superuser password-less connections but only when GSSAPI credentials have been delegated to the server by the client and GSSAPI is used to authenticate to the remote system. Authors: Stephen Frost, Peifeng Qiu Reviewed-By: David Christensen Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CO1PR05MB8023CC2CB575E0FAAD7DF4F8A8E29@CO1PR05MB8023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-08-03 06:04:14 +0000