aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/access/gist/gistbuild.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Update copyright for 2025Bruce Momjian2025-01-01
| | | | Backpatch-through: 13
* Introduce CompactAttribute array in TupleDesc, take 2David Rowley2024-12-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The new compact_attrs array stores a few select fields from FormData_pg_attribute in a more compact way, using only 16 bytes per column instead of the 104 bytes that FormData_pg_attribute uses. Using CompactAttribute allows performance-critical operations such as tuple deformation to be performed without looking at the FormData_pg_attribute element in TupleDesc which means fewer cacheline accesses. For some workloads, tuple deformation can be the most CPU intensive part of processing the query. Some testing with 16 columns on a table where the first column is variable length showed around a 10% increase in transactions per second for an OLAP type query performing aggregation on the 16th column. However, in certain cases, the increases were much higher, up to ~25% on one AMD Zen4 machine. This also makes pg_attribute.attcacheoff redundant. A follow-on commit will remove it, thus shrinking the FormData_pg_attribute struct by 4 bytes. Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Victor Yegorov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrBztXP3yx=NKNmo3xwFAFhEdyPnvrDg3=M0RhDs+4vYw@mail.gmail.com
* Remove useless casts to (void *)Peter Eisentraut2024-11-28
| | | | | | | | Many of them just seem to have been copied around for no real reason. Their presence causes (small) risks of hiding actual type mismatches or silently discarding qualifiers Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/461ea37c-8b58-43b4-9736-52884e862820@eisentraut.org
* Remove unused #include's from backend .c filesPeter Eisentraut2024-03-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | as determined by include-what-you-use (IWYU) While IWYU also suggests to *add* a bunch of #include's (which is its main purpose), this patch does not do that. In some cases, a more specific #include replaces another less specific one. Some manual adjustments of the automatic result: - IWYU currently doesn't know about includes that provide global variable declarations (like -Wmissing-variable-declarations), so those includes are being kept manually. - All includes for port(ability) headers are being kept for now, to play it safe. - No changes of catalog/pg_foo.h to catalog/pg_foo_d.h, to keep the patch from exploding in size. Note that this patch touches just *.c files, so nothing declared in header files changes in hidden ways. As a small example, in src/backend/access/transam/rmgr.c, some IWYU pragma annotations are added to handle a special case there. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/af837490-6b2f-46df-ba05-37ea6a6653fc%40eisentraut.org
* Introduce a new smgr bulk loading facility.Heikki Linnakangas2024-02-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The new facility makes it easier to optimize bulk loading, as the logic for buffering, WAL-logging, and syncing the relation only needs to be implemented once. It's also less error-prone: We have had a number of bugs in how a relation is fsync'd - or not - at the end of a bulk loading operation. By centralizing that logic to one place, we only need to write it correctly once. The new facility is faster for small relations: Instead of of calling smgrimmedsync(), we register the fsync to happen at next checkpoint, which avoids the fsync latency. That can make a big difference if you are e.g. restoring a schema-only dump with lots of relations. It is also slightly more efficient with large relations, as the WAL logging is performed multiple pages at a time. That avoids some WAL header overhead. The sorted GiST index build did that already, this moves the buffering to the new facility. The changes to pageinspect GiST test needs an explanation: Before this patch, the sorted GiST index build set the LSN on every page to the special GistBuildLSN value, not the LSN of the WAL record, even though they were WAL-logged. There was no particular need for it, it just happened naturally when we wrote out the pages before WAL-logging them. Now we WAL-log the pages first, like in B-tree build, so the pages are stamped with the record's real LSN. When the build is not WAL-logged, we still use GistBuildLSN. To make the test output predictable, use an unlogged index. Reviewed-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30e8f366-58b3-b239-c521-422122dd5150%40iki.fi
* Update copyright for 2024Bruce Momjian2024-01-03
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 12
* gist: fix typo "split(t)ed" -> "split"Robert Haas2024-01-02
| | | | | | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker, reviewed by Shubham Khanna. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/87le9fmi01.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
* Add trailing commas to enum definitionsPeter Eisentraut2023-10-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since C99, there can be a trailing comma after the last value in an enum definition. A lot of new code has been introducing this style on the fly. Some new patches are now taking an inconsistent approach to this. Some add the last comma on the fly if they add a new last value, some are trying to preserve the existing style in each place, some are even dropping the last comma if there was one. We could nudge this all in a consistent direction if we just add the trailing commas everywhere once. I omitted a few places where there was a fixed "last" value that will always stay last. I also skipped the header files of libpq and ecpg, in case people want to use those with older compilers. There were also a small number of cases where the enum type wasn't used anywhere (but the enum values were), which ended up confusing pgindent a bit, so I left those alone. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/386f8c45-c8ac-4681-8add-e3b0852c1620%40eisentraut.org
* Introduce PG_IO_ALIGN_SIZE and align all I/O buffers.Thomas Munro2023-04-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to have the option to use O_DIRECT/FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING in a later commit, we need the addresses of user space buffers to be well aligned. The exact requirements vary by OS and file system (typically sectors and/or memory pages). The address alignment size is set to 4096, which is enough for currently known systems: it matches modern sectors and common memory page size. There is no standard governing O_DIRECT's requirements so we might eventually have to reconsider this with more information from the field or future systems. Aligning I/O buffers on memory pages is also known to improve regular buffered I/O performance. Three classes of I/O buffers for regular data pages are adjusted: (1) Heap buffers are now allocated with the new palloc_aligned() or MemoryContextAllocAligned() functions introduced by commit 439f6175. (2) Stack buffers now use a new struct PGIOAlignedBlock to respect PG_IO_ALIGN_SIZE, if possible with this compiler. (3) The buffer pool is also aligned in shared memory. WAL buffers were already aligned on XLOG_BLCKSZ. It's possible for XLOG_BLCKSZ to be configured smaller than PG_IO_ALIGNED_SIZE and thus for O_DIRECT WAL writes to fail to be well aligned, but that's a pre-existing condition and will be addressed by a later commit. BufFiles are not yet addressed (there's no current plan to use O_DIRECT for those, but they could potentially get some incidental speedup even in plain buffered I/O operations through better alignment). If we can't align stack objects suitably using the compiler extensions we know about, we disable the use of O_DIRECT by setting PG_O_DIRECT to 0. This avoids the need to consider systems that have O_DIRECT but can't align stack objects the way we want; such systems could in theory be supported with more work but we don't currently know of any such machines, so it's easier to pretend there is no O_DIRECT support instead. That's an existing and tested class of system. Add assertions that all buffers passed into smgrread(), smgrwrite() and smgrextend() are correctly aligned, unless PG_O_DIRECT is 0 (= stack alignment tricks may be unavailable) or the block size has been set too small to allow arrays of buffers to be all aligned. Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGK1X532hYqJ_MzFWt0n1zt8trz980D79WbjwnT-yYLZpg@mail.gmail.com
* Pass down table relation into more index relation functionsAndres Freund2023-04-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | This is done in preparation for logical decoding on standby, which needs to include whether visibility affecting WAL records are about a (user) catalog table. Which is only known for the table, not the indexes. It's also nice to be able to pass the heap relation to GlobalVisTestFor() in vacuumRedirectAndPlaceholder(). Author: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21b700c3-eecf-2e05-a699-f8c78dd31ec7@gmail.com
* Fix dereference of dangling pointer in GiST index buffering build.Tom Lane2023-03-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | gistBuildCallback tried to fetch the size of an index tuple that might have already been freed by gistProcessEmptyingQueue. While this seems to usually be harmless in production builds, in principle it could result in a SIGSEGV, or more likely a bogus value for indtuplesSize leading to poor page-split decisions later in the build. The memory management here is confusing and could stand to be refactored, but for the moment it seems to be enough to fetch the tuple size sooner. AFAICT the indtuples[Size] totals aren't used in between these places; even if they were, the updated values shouldn't be any worse to use. So just move the incrementing of the totals up. It's not very clear why our valgrind-using buildfarm animals haven't noticed this problem, because the relevant code path does seem to be exercised according to the code coverage report. I think the reason that we didn't fix this bug after the first report is that I'd wanted to try to understand that better. However, now that it's been re-discovered let's just be pragmatic and fix it already. Original report by Alexander Lakhin (bug #16329), later rediscovered by Egor Chindyaskin (bug #17874). Patch by Alexander Lakhin (commentary by Pavel Borisov and me). Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16329-7a6aa9b6fa1118a1@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17874-63ca6c7ce42d2103@postgresql.org
* Remove useless casts to (void *) in hash_search() callsPeter Eisentraut2023-02-06
| | | | | | | | | | | Some of these appear to be leftovers from when hash_search() took a char * argument (changed in 5999e78fc45dcb91784b64b6e9ae43f4e4f68ca2). Since after this there is some more horizontal space available, do some light reformatting where suitable. Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/fd9adf5d-b1aa-e82f-e4c7-263c30145807%40enterprisedb.com
* Update copyright for 2023Bruce Momjian2023-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: 11
* Harmonize parameter names in storage and AM code.Peter Geoghegan2022-09-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog, access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in miscellaneous utility/library code. Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will do the same for other parts of the codebase. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
* Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator.Robert Haas2022-07-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
* Adjust tuplesort API to have bitwise option flagsDavid Rowley2022-04-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This replaces the bool flag for randomAccess. An upcoming patch requires adding another option, so instead of breaking the API for that, then breaking it again one day if we add more options, let's just break it once. Any boolean options we add in the future will just make use of an unused bit in the flags. Any extensions making use of tuplesorts will need to update their code to pass TUPLESORT_RANDOMACCESS instead of true for randomAccess. TUPLESORT_NONE can be used for a set of empty options. Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvoH4ASzsAOyHcxkuY01Qf%2B%2B8JJ0paw%2B03dk%2BW25tQEcNQ%40mail.gmail.com
* Fix data loss on crash after sorted GiST index build.Heikki Linnakangas2022-02-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a checkpoint happens during sorted GiST index build, and the system crashes after the checkpoint and after the index build has finished, the data written to the index before the checkpoint started could be lost. The checkpoint won't fsync it, and it won't be replayed at crash recovery either. Fix by calling smgrimmedsync() after the index build, just like in B-tree index build. Backpatch to v14 where the sorted GiST index build was introduced. Reported-by: Melanie Plageman Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_ZJJynimxKj5xYBSziL62-iEtPE+fx-B=JzR=jUtP92mw@mail.gmail.com
* Reduce non-leaf keys overlap in GiST indexes produced by a sorted buildAlexander Korotkov2022-02-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The GiST sorted build currently chooses split points according to the only page space utilization. That may lead to higher non-leaf keys overlap and, in turn, slower search query answers. This commit makes the sorted build use the opclass's picksplit method. Once four pages at the level are accumulated, the picksplit method is applied until each split partition fits the page. Some of our split algorithms could show significant performance degradation while processing 4-times more data at once. But those opclasses haven't received the sorted build support and shouldn't receive it before their split algorithms are improved. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHqSB9jqtS94e9%3D0vxqQX5dxQA89N95UKyz-%3DA7Y%2B_YJt%2BVW5A%40mail.gmail.com Author: Aliaksandr Kalenik, Sergei Shoulbakov, Andrey Borodin Reviewed-by: Björn Harrtell, Darafei Praliaskouski, Andres Freund Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov
* Update copyright for 2022Bruce Momjian2022-01-07
| | | | Backpatch-through: 10
* Replace RelationOpenSmgr() with RelationGetSmgr().Tom Lane2021-07-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The idea behind this patch is to design out bugs like the one fixed by commit 9d523119f. Previously, once one did RelationOpenSmgr(rel), it was considered okay to access rel->rd_smgr directly for some not-very-clear interval. But since that pointer will be cleared by relcache flushes, we had bugs arising from overreliance on a previous RelationOpenSmgr call still being effective. Now, very little code except that in rel.h and relcache.c should ever touch the rd_smgr field directly. The normal coding rule is to use RelationGetSmgr(rel) and not expect the result to be valid for longer than one smgr function call. There are a couple of places where using the function every single time seemed like overkill, but they are now annotated with large warning comments. Amul Sul, after an idea of mine. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANiYTQsU7yMFpQYnv=BrcRVqK_3U3mtAzAsJCaqtzsDHfsUbdQ@mail.gmail.com
* Fix typos and grammar in comments and docsMichael Paquier2021-04-19
| | | | | Author: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210416070310.GG3315@telsasoft.com
* Use correct format placeholder for block numbersPeter Eisentraut2021-04-17
| | | | Should be %u rather than %d.
* Revert "Add sortsupport for gist_btree opclasses, for faster index builds."Heikki Linnakangas2021-04-07
| | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 9f984ba6d23dc6eecebf479ab1d3f2e550a4e9be. It was making the buildfarm unhappy, apparently setting client_min_messages in a regression test produces different output if log_statement='all'. Another issue is that I now suspect the bit sortsupport function was in fact not correct to call byteacmp(). Revert to investigate both of those issues.
* Add sortsupport for gist_btree opclasses, for faster index builds.Heikki Linnakangas2021-04-07
| | | | | | | | | Commit 16fa9b2b30 introduced a faster way to build GiST indexes, by sorting all the data. This commit adds the sortsupport functions needed to make use of that feature for btree_gist. Author: Andrey Borodin Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2F3F7265-0D22-44DB-AD71-8554C743D943@yandex-team.ru
* Update copyright for 2021Bruce Momjian2021-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Re-allow testing of GiST buffered builds.Tom Lane2020-10-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 16fa9b2b3 broke the ability to reliably test GiST buffered builds, because it caused sorted builds to be done instead if sortsupport is available, regardless of any attempt to override that. While a would-be test case could try to work around that by choosing an opclass that has no sortsupport function, coverage would be silently lost the moment someone decides it'd be a good idea to add a sortsupport function. Hence, rearrange the logic in gistbuild() so that if "buffering = on" is specified in CREATE INDEX, we will use that method, sortsupport or no. Also document the interaction between sorting and the buffering parameter, as 16fa9b2b3 failed to do. (Note that in fact we still lack any test coverage of buffered builds, but this is a prerequisite to adding a non-fragile test.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3249980.1602532990@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Set right-links during sorted GiST index build.Heikki Linnakangas2020-10-01
| | | | | | | | | | | This is not strictly necessary, as the right-links are only needed by scans that are concurrent with page splits, and neither scans or page splits can happen during sorted index build. But it seems like a good idea to set them anyway, if we e.g. want to add a check to amcheck in the future to verify that the chain of right-links is complete. Author: Andrey Borodin Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4D68C21F-9FB9-41DA-B663-FDFC8D143788%40yandex-team.ru
* Fix checksum calculation in the new sorting GiST build.Heikki Linnakangas2020-09-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Since we're bypassing the buffer manager, we need to call PageSetChecksumInplace() directly. As reported by Justin Pryzby. In the passing, add RelationOpenSmgr() calls before all smgrwrite() and smgrextend() calls. Tom added one before the first smgrextend() call in commit c2bb287025, which seems to be enough, but let's play it safe and do it before each one. That's how it's done in the similar code in nbtsort.c, too. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200920224446.GF30557@telsasoft.com
* Fix new GIST build code to work under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS.Tom Lane2020-09-20
| | | | | | | Can't say if this fixes *all* cases, but at least we get through the "point" regression test now, which hyrax's last run did not. Report: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hyrax&dt=2020-09-19%2021%3A27%3A23
* Add support for building GiST index by sorting.Heikki Linnakangas2020-09-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds a new optional support function to the GiST access method: sortsupport. If it is defined, the GiST index is built by sorting all data to the order defined by the sortsupport's comparator function, and packing the tuples in that order to GiST pages. This is similar to how B-tree index build works, and is much faster than inserting the tuples one by one. The resulting index is smaller too, because the pages are packed more tightly, upto 'fillfactor'. The normal build method works by splitting pages, which tends to lead to more wasted space. The quality of the resulting index depends on how good the opclass-defined sort order is. A good order preserves locality of the input data. As the first user of this facility, add 'sortsupport' function to the point_ops opclass. It sorts the points in Z-order (aka Morton Code), by interleaving the bits of the X and Y coordinates. Author: Andrey Borodin Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov, Thomas Munro Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1A36620E-CAD8-4267-9067-FB31385E7C0D%40yandex-team.ru
* Update copyrights for 2020Bruce Momjian2020-01-01
| | | | Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
* Revert "Rename files and headers related to index AM"Michael Paquier2019-12-27
| | | | | | | | This follows multiple complains from Peter Geoghegan, Andres Freund and Alvaro Herrera that this issue ought to be dug more before actually happening, if it happens. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191226144606.GA5659@alvherre.pgsql
* Rename files and headers related to index AMMichael Paquier2019-12-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The following renaming is done so as source files related to index access methods are more consistent with table access methods (the original names used for index AMs ware too generic, and could be confused as including features related to table AMs): - amapi.h -> indexam.h. - amapi.c -> indexamapi.c. Here we have an equivalent with backend/access/table/tableamapi.c. - amvalidate.c -> indexamvalidate.c. - amvalidate.h -> indexamvalidate.h. - genam.c -> indexgenam.c. - genam.h -> indexgenam.h. This has been discussed during the development of v12 when table AM was worked on, but the renaming never happened. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Fabien Coelho, Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191223053434.GF34339@paquier.xyz
* Pass ItemPointer not HeapTuple to IndexBuildCallback.Andres Freund2019-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | Not all AMs use HeapTuples internally, making it inconvenient to pass a HeapTuple. As the index callbacks really only need the TID, not the full tuple, modify callback to only take ItemPointer. Author: Ashwin Agrawal Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALfoeis6=8ehuR=VNtHvj3z16cYfCwPdTcpaxU+sfSUJ5QgR3g@mail.gmail.com
* Support reloptions of enum typeAlvaro Herrera2019-09-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All our current in core relation options of type string (not many, admittedly) behave in reality like enums. But after seeing an implementation for enum reloptions, it's clear that strings are messier, so introduce the new reloption type. Switch all string options to be enums instead. Fortunately we have a recently introduced test module for reloptions, so we don't lose coverage of string reloptions, which may still be used by third-party modules. Authors: Nikolay Shaplov, Álvaro Herrera Reviewed-by: Nikita Glukhov, Aleksandr Parfenov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/43332102.S2V5pIjXRx@x200m
* Phase 2 pgindent run for v12.Tom Lane2019-05-22
| | | | | | | | | Switch to 2.1 version of pg_bsd_indent. This formats multiline function declarations "correctly", that is with additional lines of parameter declarations indented to match where the first line's left parenthesis is. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug@mail.gmail.com
* Generate less WAL during GiST, GIN and SP-GiST index build.Heikki Linnakangas2019-04-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Instead of WAL-logging every modification during the build separately, first build the index without any WAL-logging, and make a separate pass through the index at the end, to write all pages to the WAL. This significantly reduces the amount of WAL generated, and is usually also faster, despite the extra I/O needed for the extra scan through the index. WAL generated this way is also faster to replay. For GiST, the LSN-NSN interlock makes this a little tricky. All pages must be marked with a valid (i.e. non-zero) LSN, so that the parent-child LSN-NSN interlock works correctly. We now use magic value 1 for that during index build. Change the fake LSN counter to begin from 1000, so that 1 is safely smaller than any real or fake LSN. 2 would've been enough for our purposes, but let's reserve a bigger range, in case we need more special values in the future. Author: Anastasia Lubennikova, Andrey V. Lepikhov Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas, Dmitry Dolgov
* Report progress of CREATE INDEX operationsAlvaro Herrera2019-04-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This uses the progress reporting infrastructure added by c16dc1aca5e0, adding support for CREATE INDEX and CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY. There are two pieces to this: one is index-AM-agnostic, and the other is AM-specific. The latter is fairly elaborate for btrees, including reportage for parallel index builds and the separate phases that btree index creation uses; other index AMs, which are much simpler in their building procedures, have simplistic reporting only, but that seems sufficient, at least for non-concurrent builds. The index-AM-agnostic part is fairly complete, providing insight into the CONCURRENTLY wait phases as well as block-based progress during the index validation table scan. (The index validation index scan requires patching each AM, which has not been included here.) Reviewers: Rahila Syed, Pavan Deolasee, Tatsuro Yamada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181220220022.mg63bhk26zdpvmcj@alvherre.pgsql
* tableam: Support for an index build's initial table scan(s).Andres Freund2019-03-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | To support building indexes over tables of different AMs, the scans to do so need to be routed through the table AM. While moving a fair amount of code, nearly all the changes are just moving code to below a callback. Currently the range based interface wouldn't make much sense for non block based table AMs. But that seems aceptable for now. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de
* Refactor planner's header files.Tom Lane2019-01-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Create a new header optimizer/optimizer.h, which exposes just the planner functions that can be used "at arm's length", without need to access Paths or the other planner-internal data structures defined in nodes/relation.h. This is intended to provide the whole planner API seen by most of the rest of the system; although FDWs still need to use additional stuff, and more thought is also needed about just what selfuncs.c should rely on. The main point of doing this now is to limit the amount of new #include baggage that will be needed by "planner support functions", which I expect to introduce later, and which will be in relevant datatype modules rather than anywhere near the planner. This commit just moves relevant declarations into optimizer.h from other header files (a couple of which go away because everything got moved), and adjusts #include lists to match. There's further cleanup that could be done if we want to decide that some stuff being exposed by optimizer.h doesn't belong in the planner at all, but I'll leave that for another day. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11460.1548706639@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Update copyright for 2019Bruce Momjian2019-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.4
* Check for conflicting queries during replay of gistvacuumpage()Alexander Korotkov2018-12-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 013ebc0a7b implements so-called GiST microvacuum. That is gistgettuple() marks index tuples as dead when kill_prior_tuple is set. Later, when new tuple insertion claims page space, those dead index tuples are physically deleted from page. When this deletion is replayed on standby, it might conflict with read-only queries. But 013ebc0a7b doesn't handle this. That may lead to disappearance of some tuples from read-only snapshots on standby. This commit implements resolving of conflicts between replay of GiST microvacuum and standby queries. On the master we implement new WAL record type XLOG_GIST_DELETE, which comprises necessary information. On stable releases we've to be tricky to keep WAL compatibility. Information required for conflict processing is just appended to data of XLOG_GIST_PAGE_UPDATE record. So, PostgreSQL version, which doesn't know about conflict processing, will just ignore that. Reported-by: Andres Freund Diagnosed-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181212224524.scafnlyjindmrbe6%40alap3.anarazel.de Author: Alexander Korotkov Backpatch-through: 9.6
* Support parallel btree index builds.Robert Haas2018-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | To make this work, tuplesort.c and logtape.c must also support parallelism, so this patch adds that infrastructure and then applies it to the particular case of parallel btree index builds. Testing to date shows that this can often be 2-3x faster than a serial index build. The model for deciding how many workers to use is fairly primitive at present, but it's better than not having the feature. We can refine it as we get more experience. Peter Geoghegan with some help from Rushabh Lathia. While Heikki Linnakangas is not an author of this patch, he wrote other patches without which this feature would not have been possible, and therefore the release notes should possibly credit him as an author of this feature. Reviewed by Claudio Freire, Heikki Linnakangas, Thomas Munro, Tels, Amit Kapila, me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAM3SWZQKM=Pzc=CAHzRixKjp2eO5Q0Jg1SoFQqeXFQ647JiwqQ@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=AxWqDoVvGU7dq856S4r6sJAj6DBn7VMtigkB33N5eyg@mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright for 2018Bruce Momjian2018-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
* Add some const decorations to prototypesPeter Eisentraut2017-11-10
| | | | Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
* Change tupledesc->attrs[n] to TupleDescAttr(tupledesc, n).Andres Freund2017-08-20
| | | | | | | | | | | This is a mechanical change in preparation for a later commit that will change the layout of TupleDesc. Introducing a macro to abstract the details of where attributes are stored will allow us to change that in separate step and revise it in future. Author: Thomas Munro, editorialized by Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0ZtQ-SpsgCyzzYpsXS6e=kZWqk3g5Ygn3MDV7A8dabUA@mail.gmail.com
* Phase 3 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Phase 2 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Split index xlog headers from other private index headers.Robert Haas2017-02-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The xlog-specific headers need to be included in both frontend code - specifically, pg_waldump - and the backend, but the remainder of the private headers for each index are only needed by the backend. By splitting the xlog stuff out into separate headers, pg_waldump pulls in fewer backend headers, which is a good thing. Patch by me, reviewed by Michael Paquier and Andres Freund, per a complaint from Dilip Kumar. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ=F=GkxV0YEv-A8tb+AEGy_Qa7GSiJ8deBKFATnzfEug@mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright via script for 2017Bruce Momjian2017-01-03
|
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-05-20 14:51:12 +0000