aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/parser/parse_coerce.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Fix old bug with coercing the result of a COLLATE expression.Tom Lane2021-04-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are hacks in parse_coerce.c to push down a requested coercion to below any CollateExpr that may appear. However, we did that even if the requested data type is non-collatable, leading to an invalid expression tree in which CollateExpr is applied to a non-collatable type. The fix is just to drop the CollateExpr altogether, reasoning that it's useless. This bug is ten years old, dating to the original addition of COLLATE support. The lack of field complaints suggests that there aren't a lot of user-visible consequences. We noticed the problem because it would trigger an assertion in DefineVirtualRelation if the invalid structure appears as an output column of a view; however, in a non-assert build, you don't see a crash just a (subtly incorrect) complaint about applying collation to a non-collatable type. I found that by putting the incorrect structure further down in a view, I could make a view definition that would fail dump/reload, per the added regression test case. But CollateExpr doesn't do anything at run-time, so this likely doesn't lead to any really exciting consequences. Per report from Yulin Pei. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/HK0PR01MB22744393C474D503E16C8509F4709@HK0PR01MB2274.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
* Clarify comments in enforce_generic_type_consistency().Tom Lane2020-09-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | Some of the pre-existing comments were vague about whether they referred to all polymorphic types or only the old-style ones. Also be more consistent about using the "family 1" vs "family 2" terminology. Himanshu Upadhyaya and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPF61jBUg9XoMPNuLpoZ+h6UZ2VxKdNt3rQL1xw1GOBwjWzAXQ@mail.gmail.com
* Put back mistakenly removed #include.Tom Lane2020-04-08
| | | | | | | | In commit 4dbcb3f84 I removed some code from parse_coerce.c, and also removed some apparently-no-longer-needed #includes. But removing datum.h broke some not-compiled-by-default code. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200407205436.pyjhddw5bn5upvsu@development
* Remove bogus Assert, add some regression test cases showing why.Tom Lane2020-04-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 77ec5affb added an assertion to enforce_generic_type_consistency that boils down to "if the function result is polymorphic, there must be at least one polymorphic argument". This should be true for user-created functions, but there are built-in functions for which it's not true, as pointed out by Jaime Casanova. Hence, go back to the old behavior of leaving the return type alone. There's only a limited amount of stuff you can do with such a function result, but it does work to some extent; add some regression test cases to ensure we don't break that again. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJGNTeMbhtsCUZgJJ8h8XxAJbK7U2ipsX8wkHRtZRz-NieT8RA@mail.gmail.com
* Go back to returning int from ereport auxiliary functions.Tom Lane2020-03-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts the parts of commit 17a28b03645e27d73bf69a95d7569b61e58f06eb that changed ereport's auxiliary functions from returning dummy integer values to returning void. It turns out that a minority of compilers complain (not entirely unreasonably) about constructs such as (condition) ? errdetail(...) : 0 if errdetail() returns void rather than int. We could update those call sites to say "(void) 0" perhaps, but the expectation for this patch set was that ereport callers would not have to change anything. And this aspect of the patch set was already the most invasive and least compelling part of it, so let's just drop it. Per buildfarm. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k6N8EjNvZpM8nme+y+05mz-SM8Z_BgkixzkA34R+ej0Kw@mail.gmail.com
* Improve the internal implementation of ereport().Tom Lane2020-03-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change all the auxiliary error-reporting routines to return void, now that we no longer need to pretend they are passing something useful to errfinish(). While this probably doesn't save anything significant at the machine-code level, it allows detection of some additional types of mistakes. Pass the error location details (__FILE__, __LINE__, PG_FUNCNAME_MACRO) to errfinish not errstart. This shaves a few cycles off the case where errstart decides we're not going to emit anything. Re-implement elog() as a trivial wrapper around ereport(), removing the separate support infrastructure it used to have. Aside from getting rid of some now-surplus code, this means that elog() now really does have exactly the same semantics as ereport(), in particular that it can skip evaluation work if the message is not to be emitted. Andres Freund and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k6N8EjNvZpM8nme+y+05mz-SM8Z_BgkixzkA34R+ej0Kw@mail.gmail.com
* Introduce "anycompatible" family of polymorphic types.Tom Lane2020-03-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds the pseudo-types anycompatible, anycompatiblearray, anycompatiblenonarray, and anycompatiblerange. They work much like anyelement, anyarray, anynonarray, and anyrange respectively, except that the actual input values need not match precisely in type. Instead, if we can find a common supertype (using the same rules as for UNION/CASE type resolution), then the parser automatically promotes the input values to that type. For example, "myfunc(anycompatible, anycompatible)" can match a call with one integer and one bigint argument, with the integer automatically promoted to bigint. With anyelement in the definition, the user would have had to cast the integer explicitly. The new types also provide a second, independent set of type variables for function matching; thus with "myfunc(anyelement, anyelement, anycompatible) returns anycompatible" the first two arguments are constrained to be the same type, but the third can be some other type, and the result has the type of the third argument. The need for more than one set of type variables was foreseen back when we first invented the polymorphic types, but we never did anything about it. Pavel Stehule, revised a bit by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRDna7VqNi8gR+Tt2Ktmz0cq5G93guc3Sbn_NVPLdXAkqA@mail.gmail.com
* Refactor our checks for valid function and aggregate signatures.Tom Lane2020-03-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | pg_proc.c and pg_aggregate.c had near-duplicate copies of the logic to decide whether a function or aggregate's signature is legal. This seems like a bad thing even without the problem that the upcoming "anycompatible" patch would roughly double the complexity of that logic. Hence, refactor so that the rules are localized in new subroutines supplied by parse_coerce.c. (One could quibble about just where to add that code, but putting it beside enforce_generic_type_consistency seems not totally unreasonable.) The fact that the rules are about to change would mandate some changes in the wording of the associated error messages in any case. I ended up spelling things out in a fairly literal fashion in the errdetail messages, eg "A result of type anyelement requires at least one input of type anyelement, anyarray, anynonarray, anyenum, or anyrange." Perhaps this is overkill, but once there's more than one subgroup of polymorphic types, people might get confused by more-abstract messages. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/24137.1584139352@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Adjust handling of an ANYARRAY actual input for an ANYARRAY argument.Tom Lane2020-03-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ordinarily it's impossible for an actual input of a function to have declared type ANYARRAY, since we'd resolve that to a concrete array type before doing argument type resolution for the function. But an exception arises for functions applied to certain columns of pg_statistic or pg_stats, since we abuse the "anyarray" pseudotype by using it to declare those columns. So parse_coerce.c has to deal with the case. Previously we allowed an ANYARRAY actual input to match an ANYARRAY polymorphic argument, but only if no other argument or result was declared ANYELEMENT. When that logic was written, those were the only two polymorphic types, and I fear nobody thought carefully about how it ought to extend to the other ones that came along later. But actually it was wrong even then, because if a function has two ANYARRAY arguments, it should be able to expect that they have identical element types, and we'd not be able to ensure that. The correct generalization is that we can match an ANYARRAY actual input to an ANYARRAY polymorphic argument only if no other argument or result is of any polymorphic type, so that no promises are being made about element type compatibility. check_generic_type_consistency can't test that condition, but it seems better anyway to accept such matches there and then throw an error if needed in enforce_generic_type_consistency. That way we can produce a specific error message rather than an unintuitive "function does not exist" complaint. (There's some risk perhaps of getting new ambiguous-function complaints, but I think that any set of functions for which that could happen would be ambiguous against ordinary array columns as well.) While we're at it, we can improve the message that's produced in cases that the code did already object to, as shown in the regression test changes. Also, remove a similar test that got cargo-culted in for ANYRANGE; there are no catalog columns of type ANYRANGE, and I hope we never create any, so that's not needed. (It was incomplete anyway.) While here, update some comments and rearrange the code a bit in preparation for upcoming additions of more polymorphic types. In practical situations I believe this is just exchanging one error message for another, hopefully better, one. So it doesn't seem needful to back-patch, even though the mistake is ancient. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21569.1584314271@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Restructure polymorphic-type resolution in funcapi.c.Tom Lane2020-03-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | resolve_polymorphic_tupdesc() and resolve_polymorphic_argtypes() failed to cover the case of having to resolve anyarray given only an anyrange input. The bug was masked if anyelement was also used (as either input or output), which probably helps account for our not having noticed. While looking at this I noticed that resolve_generic_type() would produce the wrong answer if asked to make that same resolution. ISTM that resolve_generic_type() is confusingly defined and overly complex, so rather than fix it, let's just make funcapi.c do the specific lookups it requires for itself. With this change, resolve_generic_type() is not used anywhere, so remove it in HEAD. In the back branches, leave it alone (complete with bug) just in case any external code is using it. While we're here, make some other refactoring adjustments in funcapi.c with an eye to upcoming future expansion of the set of polymorphic types: * Simplify quick-exit tests by adding an overall have_polymorphic_result flag. This is about a wash now but will be a win when there are more flags. * Reduce duplication of code between resolve_polymorphic_tupdesc() and resolve_polymorphic_argtypes(). * Don't bother to validate correct matching of anynonarray or anyenum; the parser should have done that, and even if it didn't, just doing "return false" here would lead to a very confusing, off-point error message. (Really, "return false" in these two functions should only occur if the call_expr isn't supplied or we can't obtain data type info from it.) * For the same reason, throw an elog rather than "return false" if we fail to resolve a polymorphic type. The bug's been there since we added anyrange, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6093.1584202130@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Make parser rely more heavily on the ParseNamespaceItem data structure.Tom Lane2020-01-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When I added the ParseNamespaceItem data structure (in commit 5ebaaa494), it wasn't very tightly integrated into the parser's APIs. In the wake of adding p_rtindex to that struct (commit b541e9acc), there is a good reason to make more use of it: by passing around ParseNamespaceItem pointers instead of bare RTE pointers, we can get rid of various messy methods for passing back or deducing the rangetable index of an RTE during parsing. Hence, refactor the addRangeTableEntryXXX functions to build and return a ParseNamespaceItem struct, not just the RTE proper; and replace addRTEtoQuery with addNSItemToQuery, which is passed a ParseNamespaceItem rather than building one internally. Also, add per-column data (a ParseNamespaceColumn array) to each ParseNamespaceItem. These arrays are built during addRangeTableEntryXXX, where we have column type data at hand so that it's nearly free to fill the data structure. Later, when we need to build Vars referencing RTEs, we can use the ParseNamespaceColumn info to avoid the rather expensive operations done in get_rte_attribute_type() or expandRTE(). get_rte_attribute_type() is indeed dead code now, so I've removed it. This makes for a useful improvement in parse analysis speed, around 20% in one moderately-complex test query. The ParseNamespaceColumn structs also include Var identity information (varno/varattno). That info isn't actually being used in this patch, except that p_varno == 0 is a handy test for a dropped column. A follow-on patch will make more use of it. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2461.1577764221@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Update copyrights for 2020Bruce Momjian2020-01-01
| | | | Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
* Represent Lists as expansible arrays, not chains of cons-cells.Tom Lane2019-07-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Originally, Postgres Lists were a more or less exact reimplementation of Lisp lists, which consist of chains of separately-allocated cons cells, each having a value and a next-cell link. We'd hacked that once before (commit d0b4399d8) to add a separate List header, but the data was still in cons cells. That makes some operations -- notably list_nth() -- O(N), and it's bulky because of the next-cell pointers and per-cell palloc overhead, and it's very cache-unfriendly if the cons cells end up scattered around rather than being adjacent. In this rewrite, we still have List headers, but the data is in a resizable array of values, with no next-cell links. Now we need at most two palloc's per List, and often only one, since we can allocate some values in the same palloc call as the List header. (Of course, extending an existing List may require repalloc's to enlarge the array. But this involves just O(log N) allocations not O(N).) Of course this is not without downsides. The key difficulty is that addition or deletion of a list entry may now cause other entries to move, which it did not before. For example, that breaks foreach() and sister macros, which historically used a pointer to the current cons-cell as loop state. We can repair those macros transparently by making their actual loop state be an integer list index; the exposed "ListCell *" pointer is no longer state carried across loop iterations, but is just a derived value. (In practice, modern compilers can optimize things back to having just one loop state value, at least for simple cases with inline loop bodies.) In principle, this is a semantics change for cases where the loop body inserts or deletes list entries ahead of the current loop index; but I found no such cases in the Postgres code. The change is not at all transparent for code that doesn't use foreach() but chases lists "by hand" using lnext(). The largest share of such code in the backend is in loops that were maintaining "prev" and "next" variables in addition to the current-cell pointer, in order to delete list cells efficiently using list_delete_cell(). However, we no longer need a previous-cell pointer to delete a list cell efficiently. Keeping a next-cell pointer doesn't work, as explained above, but we can improve matters by changing such code to use a regular foreach() loop and then using the new macro foreach_delete_current() to delete the current cell. (This macro knows how to update the associated foreach loop's state so that no cells will be missed in the traversal.) There remains a nontrivial risk of code assuming that a ListCell * pointer will remain good over an operation that could now move the list contents. To help catch such errors, list.c can be compiled with a new define symbol DEBUG_LIST_MEMORY_USAGE that forcibly moves list contents whenever that could possibly happen. This makes list operations significantly more expensive so it's not normally turned on (though it is on by default if USE_VALGRIND is on). There are two notable API differences from the previous code: * lnext() now requires the List's header pointer in addition to the current cell's address. * list_delete_cell() no longer requires a previous-cell argument. These changes are somewhat unfortunate, but on the other hand code using either function needs inspection to see if it is assuming anything it shouldn't, so it's not all bad. Programmers should be aware of these significant performance changes: * list_nth() and related functions are now O(1); so there's no major access-speed difference between a list and an array. * Inserting or deleting a list element now takes time proportional to the distance to the end of the list, due to moving the array elements. (However, it typically *doesn't* require palloc or pfree, so except in long lists it's probably still faster than before.) Notably, lcons() used to be about the same cost as lappend(), but that's no longer true if the list is long. Code that uses lcons() and list_delete_first() to maintain a stack might usefully be rewritten to push and pop at the end of the list rather than the beginning. * There are now list_insert_nth...() and list_delete_nth...() functions that add or remove a list cell identified by index. These have the data-movement penalty explained above, but there's no search penalty. * list_concat() and variants now copy the second list's data into storage belonging to the first list, so there is no longer any sharing of cells between the input lists. The second argument is now declared "const List *" to reflect that it isn't changed. This patch just does the minimum needed to get the new implementation in place and fix bugs exposed by the regression tests. As suggested by the foregoing, there's a fair amount of followup work remaining to do. Also, the ENABLE_LIST_COMPAT macros are finally removed in this commit. Code using those should have been gone a dozen years ago. Patch by me; thanks to David Rowley, Jesper Pedersen, and others for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11587.1550975080@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Phase 2 pgindent run for v12.Tom Lane2019-05-22
| | | | | | | | | Switch to 2.1 version of pg_bsd_indent. This formats multiline function declarations "correctly", that is with additional lines of parameter declarations indented to match where the first line's left parenthesis is. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0P3FeTXRcU5B2W3jv3PgRVZ-kGUXLGfd42FFhUROO3ug@mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright for 2019Bruce Momjian2019-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.4
* Fix interaction of CASE and ArrayCoerceExpr.Tom Lane2018-10-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | An array-type coercion appearing within a CASE that has a constant (after const-folding) test expression was mangled by the planner, causing all the elements of the resulting array to be equal to the coerced value of the CASE's test expression. This is my oversight in commit c12d570fa: that changed ArrayCoerceExpr to use a subexpression involving a CaseTestExpr, and I didn't notice that eval_const_expressions needed an adjustment to keep from folding such a CaseTestExpr to a constant when it's inside a suitable CASE. This is another in what's getting to be a depressingly long line of bugs associated with misidentification of the referent of a CaseTestExpr. We're overdue to redesign that mechanism; but any such fix is unlikely to be back-patchable into v11. As a stopgap, fix eval_const_expressions to do what it must here. Also add a bunch of comments pointing out the restrictions and assumptions that are needed to make this work at all. Also fix a related oversight: contain_context_dependent_node() was not aware of the relationship of ArrayCoerceExpr to CaseTestExpr. That was somewhat fail-soft, in that the outcome of a wrong answer would be to prevent optimizations that could have been made, but let's fix it while we're at it. Per bug #15471 from Matt Williams. Back-patch to v11 where the faulty logic came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15471-1117f49271989bad@postgresql.org
* Sprinkle some const decorationsPeter Eisentraut2018-10-23
| | | | These mainly help understanding the function signatures better.
* Merge catalog/pg_foo_fn.h headers back into pg_foo.h headers.Tom Lane2018-04-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Traditionally, include/catalog/pg_foo.h contains extern declarations for functions in backend/catalog/pg_foo.c, in addition to its function as the authoritative definition of the pg_foo catalog's rowtype. In some cases, we'd been forced to split out those extern declarations into separate pg_foo_fn.h headers so that the catalog definitions could be #include'd by frontend code. That problem is gone as of commit 9c0a0de4c, so let's undo the splits to make things less confusing. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/23690.1523031777@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Add prokind column, replacing proisagg and proiswindowPeter Eisentraut2018-03-02
| | | | | | | | | | The new column distinguishes normal functions, procedures, aggregates, and window functions. This replaces the existing columns proisagg and proiswindow, and replaces the convention that procedures are indicated by prorettype == 0. Also change prorettype to be VOIDOID for procedures. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
* Update copyright for 2018Bruce Momjian2018-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
* Change TRUE/FALSE to true/falsePeter Eisentraut2017-11-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The lower case spellings are C and C++ standard and are used in most parts of the PostgreSQL sources. The upper case spellings are only used in some files/modules. So standardize on the standard spellings. The APIs for ICU, Perl, and Windows define their own TRUE and FALSE, so those are left as is when using those APIs. In code comments, we use the lower-case spelling for the C concepts and keep the upper-case spelling for the SQL concepts. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
* Support domains over composite types.Tom Lane2017-10-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is the last major omission in our domains feature: you can now make a domain over anything that's not a pseudotype. The major complication from an implementation standpoint is that places that might be creating tuples of a domain type now need to be prepared to apply domain_check(). It seems better that unprepared code fail with an error like "<type> is not composite" than that it silently fail to apply domain constraints. Therefore, relevant infrastructure like get_func_result_type() and lookup_rowtype_tupdesc() has been adjusted to treat domain-over-composite as a distinct case that unprepared code won't recognize, rather than just transparently treating it the same as plain composite. This isn't a 100% solution to the possibility of overlooked domain checks, but it catches most places. In passing, improve typcache.c's support for domains (it can now cache the identity of a domain's base type), and rewrite the argument handling logic in jsonfuncs.c's populate_record[set]_worker to reduce duplicative per-call lookups. I believe this is code-complete so far as the core and contrib code go. The PLs need varying amounts of work, which will be tackled in followup patches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4206.1499798337@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Support arrays over domains.Tom Lane2017-09-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allowing arrays with a domain type as their element type was left un-done in the original domain patch, but not for any very good reason. This omission leads to such surprising results as array_agg() not working on a domain column, because the parser can't identify a suitable output type for the polymorphic aggregate. In order to fix this, first clean up the APIs of coerce_to_domain() and some internal functions in parse_coerce.c so that we consistently pass around a CoercionContext along with CoercionForm. Previously, we sometimes passed an "isExplicit" boolean flag instead, which is strictly less information; and coerce_to_domain() didn't even get that, but instead had to reverse-engineer isExplicit from CoercionForm. That's contrary to the documentation in primnodes.h that says that CoercionForm only affects display and not semantics. I don't think this change fixes any live bugs, but it makes things more consistent. The main reason for doing it though is that now build_coercion_expression() receives ccontext, which it needs in order to be able to recursively invoke coerce_to_target_type(). Next, reimplement ArrayCoerceExpr so that the node does not directly know any details of what has to be done to the individual array elements while performing the array coercion. Instead, the per-element processing is represented by a sub-expression whose input is a source array element and whose output is a target array element. This simplifies life in parse_coerce.c, because it can build that sub-expression by a recursive invocation of coerce_to_target_type(). The executor now handles the per-element processing as a compiled expression instead of hard-wired code. The main advantage of this is that we can use a single ArrayCoerceExpr to handle as many as three successive steps per element: base type conversion, typmod coercion, and domain constraint checking. The old code used two stacked ArrayCoerceExprs to handle type + typmod coercion, which was pretty inefficient, and adding yet another array deconstruction to do domain constraint checking seemed very unappetizing. In the case where we just need a single, very simple coercion function, doing this straightforwardly leads to a noticeable increase in the per-array-element runtime cost. Hence, add an additional shortcut evalfunc in execExprInterp.c that skips unnecessary overhead for that specific form of expression. The runtime speed of simple cases is within 1% or so of where it was before, while cases that previously required two levels of array processing are significantly faster. Finally, create an implicit array type for every domain type, as we do for base types, enums, etc. Everything except the array-coercion case seems to just work without further effort. Tom Lane, reviewed by Andrew Dunstan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9852.1499791473@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Reduce excessive dereferencing of function pointersPeter Eisentraut2017-09-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | It is equivalent in ANSI C to write (*funcptr) () and funcptr(). These two styles have been applied inconsistently. After discussion, we'll use the more verbose style for plain function pointer variables, to make it clear that it's a variable, and the shorter style when the function pointer is in a struct (s.func() or s->func()), because then it's clear that it's not a plain function name, and otherwise the excessive punctuation makes some of those invocations hard to read. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f52c16db-14ed-757d-4b48-7ef360b1631d@2ndquadrant.com
* Change tupledesc->attrs[n] to TupleDescAttr(tupledesc, n).Andres Freund2017-08-20
| | | | | | | | | | | This is a mechanical change in preparation for a later commit that will change the layout of TupleDesc. Introducing a macro to abstract the details of where attributes are stored will allow us to change that in separate step and revise it in future. Author: Thomas Munro, editorialized by Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0ZtQ-SpsgCyzzYpsXS6e=kZWqk3g5Ygn3MDV7A8dabUA@mail.gmail.com
* Phase 3 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Phase 2 of pgindent updates.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Support XMLTABLE query expressionAlvaro Herrera2017-03-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | XMLTABLE is defined by the SQL/XML standard as a feature that allows turning XML-formatted data into relational form, so that it can be used as a <table primary> in the FROM clause of a query. This new construct provides significant simplicity and performance benefit for XML data processing; what in a client-side custom implementation was reported to take 20 minutes can be executed in 400ms using XMLTABLE. (The same functionality was said to take 10 seconds using nested PostgreSQL XPath function calls, and 5 seconds using XMLReader under PL/Python). The implemented syntax deviates slightly from what the standard requires. First, the standard indicates that the PASSING clause is optional and that multiple XML input documents may be given to it; we make it mandatory and accept a single document only. Second, we don't currently support a default namespace to be specified. This implementation relies on a new executor node based on a hardcoded method table. (Because the grammar is fixed, there is no extensibility in the current approach; further constructs can be implemented on top of this such as JSON_TABLE, but they require changes to core code.) Author: Pavel Stehule, Álvaro Herrera Extensively reviewed by: Craig Ringer Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRAgfzMD-LoSmnMGybD0WsEznLHWap8DO79+-GTRAPR4qA@mail.gmail.com
* Make messages mentioning type names more uniformAlvaro Herrera2017-01-18
| | | | | | | | | This avoids additional translatable strings for each distinct type, as well as making our quoting style around type names more consistent (namely, that we don't quote type names). This continues what started as f402b9950120. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20160401170642.GA57509@alvherre.pgsql
* Update copyright via script for 2017Bruce Momjian2017-01-03
|
* Add defenses against putting expanded objects into Const nodes.Tom Lane2016-01-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Putting a reference to an expanded-format value into a Const node would be a bad idea for a couple of reasons. It'd be possible for the supposedly immutable Const to change value, if something modified the referenced variable ... in fact, if the Const's reference were R/W, any function that has the Const as argument might itself change it at runtime. Also, because datumIsEqual() is pretty simplistic, the Const might fail to compare equal to other Consts that it should compare equal to, notably including copies of itself. This could lead to unexpected planner behavior, such as "could not find pathkey item to sort" errors or inferior plans. I have not been able to find any way to get an expanded value into a Const within the existing core code; but Paul Ramsey was able to trigger the problem by writing a datatype input function that returns an expanded value. The best fix seems to be to establish a rule that varlena values being placed into Const nodes should be passed through pg_detoast_datum(). That will do nothing (and cost little) in normal cases, but it will flatten expanded values and thereby avoid the above problems. Also, it will convert short-header or compressed values into canonical format, which will avoid possible unexpected lack-of-equality issues for those cases too. And it provides a last-ditch defense against putting a toasted value into a Const, which we already knew was dangerous, cf commit 2b0c86b66563cf2f. (In the light of this discussion, I'm no longer sure that that commit provided 100% protection against such cases, but this fix should do it.) The test added in commit 65c3d05e18e7c530 to catch datatype input functions with unstable results would fail for functions that returned expanded values; but it seems a bit uncharitable to deem a result unstable just because it's expressed in expanded form, so revise the coding so that we check for bitwise equality only after applying pg_detoast_datum(). That's a sufficient condition anyway given the new rule about detoasting when forming a Const. Back-patch to 9.5 where the expanded-object facility was added. It's possible that this should go back further; but in the absence of clear evidence that there's any live bug in older branches, I'll refrain for now.
* Update copyright for 2016Bruce Momjian2016-01-02
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.1
* Rename coerce_type() local variable.Noah Misch2015-05-02
| | | | | | coerce_type() has local variables named targetTypeId, baseTypeId, and targetType. targetType has been the Type structure for baseTypeId, so rename it to baseType.
* Update copyright for 2015Bruce Momjian2015-01-06
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.0
* pgindent run for 9.4Bruce Momjian2014-05-06
| | | | | This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.
* Update copyright for 2014Bruce Momjian2014-01-07
| | | | | Update all files in head, and files COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml in all back branches.
* Support ordered-set (WITHIN GROUP) aggregates.Tom Lane2013-12-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch introduces generic support for ordered-set and hypothetical-set aggregate functions, as well as implementations of the instances defined in SQL:2008 (percentile_cont(), percentile_disc(), rank(), dense_rank(), percent_rank(), cume_dist()). We also added mode() though it is not in the spec, as well as versions of percentile_cont() and percentile_disc() that can compute multiple percentile values in one pass over the data. Unlike the original submission, this patch puts full control of the sorting process in the hands of the aggregate's support functions. To allow the support functions to find out how they're supposed to sort, a new API function AggGetAggref() is added to nodeAgg.c. This allows retrieval of the aggregate call's Aggref node, which may have other uses beyond the immediate need. There is also support for ordered-set aggregates to install cleanup callback functions, so that they can be sure that infrastructure such as tuplesort objects gets cleaned up. In passing, make some fixes in the recently-added support for variadic aggregates, and make some editorial adjustments in the recent FILTER additions for aggregates. Also, simplify use of IsBinaryCoercible() by allowing it to succeed whenever the target type is ANY or ANYELEMENT. It was inconsistent that it dealt with other polymorphic target types but not these. Atri Sharma and Andrew Gierth; reviewed by Pavel Stehule and Vik Fearing, and rather heavily editorialized upon by Tom Lane
* Update copyrights for 2013Bruce Momjian2013-01-01
| | | | | Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.
* Make some messages more consistent in stylePeter Eisentraut2012-12-21
|
* Split tuple struct defs from htup.h to htup_details.hAlvaro Herrera2012-08-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | This reduces unnecessary exposure of other headers through htup.h, which is very widely included by many files. I have chosen to move the function prototypes to the new file as well, because that means htup.h no longer needs to include tupdesc.h. In itself this doesn't have much effect in indirect inclusion of tupdesc.h throughout the tree, because it's also required by execnodes.h; but it's something to explore in the future, and it seemed best to do the htup.h change now while I'm busy with it.
* Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3Bruce Momjian2012-06-10
| | | | commit-fest.
* Bend parse location rules for the convenience of pg_stat_statements.Tom Lane2012-03-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Generally, the parse location assigned to a multiple-token construct is the location of its leftmost token. This commit breaks that rule for the syntaxes TYPENAME 'LITERAL' and CAST(CONSTANT AS TYPENAME) --- the resulting Const will have the location of the literal string, not the typename or CAST keyword. The cases where this matters are pretty thin on the ground (no error messages in the regression tests change, for example), and it's unlikely that any user would be confused anyway by an error cursor pointing at the literal. But still it's less than consistent. The reason for changing it is that contrib/pg_stat_statements wants to know the parse location of the original literal, and it was agreed that this is the least unpleasant way to preserve that information through parse analysis. Peter Geoghegan
* Fix coerce_to_target_type for coerce_type's klugy handling of COLLATE.Tom Lane2012-01-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Because coerce_type recurses into the argument of a CollateExpr, coerce_to_target_type's longstanding code for detecting whether coerce_type had actually done anything (to wit, returned a different node than it passed in) was broken in 9.1. This resulted in unexpected failures in hide_coercion_node; which was not the latter's fault, since it's critical that we never call it on anything that wasn't inserted by coerce_type. (Else we might decide to "hide" a user-written function call.) Fix by removing and replacing the CollateExpr in coerce_to_target_type itself. This is all pretty ugly but I don't immediately see a way to make it nicer. Per report from Jean-Yves F. Barbier.
* Update copyright notices for year 2012.Bruce Momjian2012-01-01
|
* Further code review for range types patch.Tom Lane2011-11-20
| | | | | Fix some bugs in coercion logic and pg_dump; more comment cleanup; minor cosmetic improvements.
* Support range data types.Heikki Linnakangas2011-11-03
| | | | | | | Selectivity estimation functions are missing for some range type operators, which is a TODO. Jeff Davis
* Remove unnecessary #include references, per pgrminclude script.Bruce Momjian2011-09-01
|
* Pgindent run before 9.1 beta2.Bruce Momjian2011-06-09
|
* Allow domains over arrays to match ANYARRAY parameters again.Tom Lane2011-06-08
| | | | | | | | | | | This use-case was broken in commit 529cb267a6843a6a8190c86b75d091771d99d6a9 of 2010-10-21, in which I commented "For the moment, we just forbid such matching. We might later wish to insert an automatic downcast to the underlying array type, but such a change should also change matching of domains to ANYELEMENT for consistency". We still lack consensus about what to do with ANYELEMENT; but not matching ANYARRAY is a clear loss of functionality compared to prior releases, so let's go ahead and make that happen. Per complaint from Regina Obe and extensive subsequent discussion.
* pgindent run before PG 9.1 beta 1.Bruce Momjian2011-04-10
|