aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/utils/adt/int.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Update copyright for 2025Bruce Momjian2025-01-01
| | | | Backpatch-through: 13
* Update copyright for 2024Bruce Momjian2024-01-03
| | | | | | | | Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 12
* Remove arbitrary FUNC_MAX_ARGS limit in int2vectorin and oidvectorin.Tom Lane2023-01-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | int2vectorin limited the number of array elements it'd take to FUNC_MAX_ARGS, which is probably fine for the traditional use-cases. But now that pg_publication_rel.prattrs is an int2vector, it's not fine at all: it's easy to construct cases where that can have up to about MaxTupleAttributeNumber entries. Trying to replicate such tables leads to logical-replication failures. As long as we have to touch this code anyway, let's just remove the a-priori limit altogether, and let it accept any size that'll be allowed by repalloc. (Note that since int2vector isn't toastable, we cannot store arrays longer than about BLCKSZ/2; but there is no good excuse for letting int2vectorin depend on that. Perhaps we will lift the no-toast restriction someday.) While at it, also improve the equivalent logic in oidvectorin. I don't know of any practical use-case for long oidvectors right now, but doing it right actually makes the code shorter. Per report from Erik Rijkers. Back-patch to v15 where pg_publication_rel.prattrs was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/668ba539-33c5-8190-ca11-def2913cb94b@xs4all.nl
* Update copyright for 2023Bruce Momjian2023-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: 11
* Convert a few more datatype input functions to report errors softly.Tom Lane2022-12-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Convert assorted internal-ish datatypes, namely aclitemin, int2vectorin, oidin, oidvectorin, pg_lsn_in, pg_snapshot_in, and tidin to the new style. (Some others you might expect to find in this group, such as cidin and xidin, need no changes because they never throw errors at all. That seems a little cheesy ... but it is not in the charter of this patch series to add new error conditions.) Amul Sul, minor mods by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b97KeDWUdpTKGOaFYPv0OicjOu6EW+QYWj-Ywrgj_aEy1g@mail.gmail.com
* Convert a few datatype input functions to use "soft" error reporting.Tom Lane2022-12-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch converts the input functions for bool, int2, int4, int8, float4, float8, numeric, and contrib/cube to the new soft-error style. array_in and record_in are also converted. There's lots more to do, but this is enough to provide proof-of-concept that the soft-error API is usable, as well as reference examples for how to convert input functions. This patch is mostly by me, but it owes very substantial debt to earlier work by Nikita Glukhov, Andrew Dunstan, and Amul Sul. Thanks to Andres Freund for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3bbbb0df-7382-bf87-9737-340ba096e034@postgrespro.ru
* Remove pg_atoi()Peter Eisentraut2022-02-15
| | | | | | | | | The last caller was int2vectorin(), and having such a general function for one user didn't seem useful, so just put the required parts inline and remove the function. Reviewed-by: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/b239564c-cad0-b23e-c57e-166d883cb97d@enterprisedb.com
* Update copyright for 2022Bruce Momjian2022-01-07
| | | | Backpatch-through: 10
* Update copyright for 2021Bruce Momjian2021-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Have pg_itoa, pg_ltoa and pg_lltoa return the length of the stringDavid Rowley2020-06-13
| | | | | | | | | | | Core by no means makes excessive use of these functions, but quite a large number of those usages do require the caller to call strlen() on the returned string. This is quite wasteful since these functions do already have a good idea of the length of the string, so we might as well just have them return that. Reviewed-by: Andrew Gierth Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrm2A5x2uHYxsqriO2cUaGcFvND%2BksC9e7Tjep0t2RK_A%40mail.gmail.com
* Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v13.Tom Lane2020-05-14
| | | | | | | | | | | Includes some manual cleanup of places that pgindent messed up, most of which weren't per project style anyway. Notably, it seems some people didn't absorb the style rules of commit c9d297751, because there were a bunch of new occurrences of function calls with a newline just after the left paren, all with faulty expectations about how the rest of the call would get indented.
* Add functions gcd() and lcm() for integer and numeric types.Dean Rasheed2020-01-25
| | | | | | | | | These compute the greatest common divisor and least common multiple of a pair of numbers using the Euclidean algorithm. Vik Fearing, reviewed by Fabien Coelho. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/adbd3e0b-e3f1-5bbc-21db-03caf1cef0f7@2ndquadrant.com
* Update copyrights for 2020Bruce Momjian2020-01-01
| | | | Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
* Build out the planner support function infrastructure.Tom Lane2019-02-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add support function requests for estimating the selectivity, cost, and number of result rows (if a SRF) of the target function. The lack of a way to estimate selectivity of a boolean-returning function in WHERE has been a recognized deficiency of the planner since Berkeley days. This commit finally fixes it. In addition, non-constant estimates of cost and number of output rows are now possible. We still fall back to looking at procost and prorows if the support function doesn't service the request, of course. To make concrete use of the possibility of estimating output rowcount for SRFs, this commit adds support functions for array_unnest(anyarray) and the integer variants of generate_series; the lack of plausible rowcount estimates for those, even when it's obvious to a human, has been a repeated subject of complaints. Obviously, much more could now be done in this line, but I'm mostly just trying to get the infrastructure in place. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15193.1548028093@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Change function call information to be variable length.Andres Freund2019-01-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before this change FunctionCallInfoData, the struct arguments etc for V1 function calls are stored in, always had space for FUNC_MAX_ARGS/100 arguments, storing datums and their nullness in two arrays. For nearly every function call 100 arguments is far more than needed, therefore wasting memory. Arg and argnull being two separate arrays also guarantees that to access a single argument, two cachelines have to be touched. Change the layout so there's a single variable-length array with pairs of value / isnull. That drastically reduces memory consumption for most function calls (on x86-64 a two argument function now uses 64bytes, previously 936 bytes), and makes it very likely that argument value and its nullness are on the same cacheline. Arguments are stored in a new NullableDatum struct, which, due to padding, needs more memory per argument than before. But as usually far fewer arguments are stored, and individual arguments are cheaper to access, that's still a clear win. It's likely that there's other places where conversion to NullableDatum arrays would make sense, e.g. TupleTableSlots, but that's for another commit. Because the function call information is now variable-length allocations have to take the number of arguments into account. For heap allocations that can be done with SizeForFunctionCallInfoData(), for on-stack allocations there's a new LOCAL_FCINFO(name, nargs) macro that helps to allocate an appropriately sized and aligned variable. Some places with stack allocation function call information don't know the number of arguments at compile time, and currently variably sized stack allocations aren't allowed in postgres. Therefore allow for FUNC_MAX_ARGS space in these cases. They're not that common, so for now that seems acceptable. Because of the need to allocate FunctionCallInfo of the appropriate size, older extensions may need to update their code. To avoid subtle breakages, the FunctionCallInfoData struct has been renamed to FunctionCallInfoBaseData. Most code only references FunctionCallInfo, so that shouldn't cause much collateral damage. This change is also a prerequisite for more efficient expression JIT compilation (by allocating the function call information on the stack, allowing LLVM to optimize it away); previously the size of the call information caused problems inside LLVM's optimizer. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180605172952.x34m5uz6ju6enaem@alap3.anarazel.de
* Update copyright for 2019Bruce Momjian2019-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.4
* Hand code string to integer conversion for performance.Andres Freund2018-07-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As benchmarks show, using libc's string-to-integer conversion is pretty slow. At least part of the reason for that is that strtol[l] have to be more generic than what largely is required inside pg. This patch considerably speeds up int2/int4 input (int8 already was already using hand-rolled code). Most of the existing pg_atoi callers have been converted. But as one requires pg_atoi's custom delimiter functionality, and as it seems likely that there's external pg_atoi users, it seems sensible to just keep pg_atoi around. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171208214437.qgn6zdltyq5hmjpk@alap3.anarazel.de
* Make new error code name match SQL standard more closelyPeter Eisentraut2018-06-11
| | | | Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/dff3d555-bea4-ac24-29b2-29521b9d08e8%402ndquadrant.com
* Support all SQL:2011 options for window frame clauses.Tom Lane2018-02-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds the ability to use "RANGE offset PRECEDING/FOLLOWING" frame boundaries in window functions. We'd punted on that back in the original patch to add window functions, because it was not clear how to do it in a reasonably data-type-extensible fashion. That problem is resolved here by adding the ability for btree operator classes to provide an "in_range" support function that defines how to add or subtract the RANGE offset value. Factoring it this way also allows the operator class to avoid overflow problems near the ends of the datatype's range, if it wishes to expend effort on that. (In the committed patch, the integer opclasses handle that issue, but it did not seem worth the trouble to avoid overflow failures for datetime types.) The patch includes in_range support for the integer_ops opfamily (int2/int4/int8) as well as the standard datetime types. Support for other numeric types has been requested, but that seems like suitable material for a follow-on patch. In addition, the patch adds GROUPS mode which counts the offset in ORDER-BY peer groups rather than rows, and it adds the frame_exclusion options specified by SQL:2011. As far as I can see, we are now fully up to spec on window framing options. Existing behaviors remain unchanged, except that I changed the errcode for a couple of existing error reports to meet the SQL spec's expectation that negative "offset" values should be reported as SQLSTATE 22013. Internally and in relevant parts of the documentation, we now consistently use the terminology "offset PRECEDING/FOLLOWING" rather than "value PRECEDING/FOLLOWING", since the term "value" is confusingly vague. Oliver Ford, reviewed and whacked around some by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGMVOdu9sivPAxbNN0X+q19Sfv9edEPv=HibOJhB14TJv_RCQg@mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright for 2018Bruce Momjian2018-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
* Consistently use PG_INT(16|32|64)_(MIN|MAX).Andres Freund2017-12-12
| | | | Per buildfarm animal woodlouse.
* Use new overflow aware integer operations.Andres Freund2017-12-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A previous commit added inline functions that provide fast(er) and correct overflow checks for signed integer math. Use them in a significant portion of backend code. There's more to touch in both backend and frontend code, but these were the easily identifiable cases. The old overflow checks are noticeable in integer heavy workloads. A secondary benefit is that getting rid of overflow checks that rely on signed integer overflow wrapping around, will allow us to get rid of -fwrapv in the future. Which in turn slows down other code. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171024103954.ztmatprlglz3rwke@alap3.anarazel.de
* Replace remaining uses of pq_sendint with pq_sendint{8,16,32}.Andres Freund2017-10-11
| | | | | | | pq_sendint() remains, so extension code doesn't unnecessarily break. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170914063418.sckdzgjfrsbekae4@alap3.anarazel.de
* Initial pgindent run with pg_bsd_indent version 2.0.Tom Lane2017-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The new indent version includes numerous fixes thanks to Piotr Stefaniak. The main changes visible in this commit are: * Nicer formatting of function-pointer declarations. * No longer unexpectedly removes spaces in expressions using casts, sizeof, or offsetof. * No longer wants to add a space in "struct structname *varname", as well as some similar cases for const- or volatile-qualified pointers. * Declarations using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY are formatted more nicely. * Fixes bug where comments following declarations were sometimes placed with no space separating them from the code. * Fixes some odd decisions for comments following case labels. * Fixes some cases where comments following code were indented to less than the expected column 33. On the less good side, it now tends to put more whitespace around typedef names that are not listed in typedefs.list. This might encourage us to put more effort into typedef name collection; it's not really a bug in indent itself. There are more changes coming after this round, having to do with comment indentation and alignment of lines appearing within parentheses. I wanted to limit the size of the diffs to something that could be reviewed without one's eyes completely glazing over, so it seemed better to split up the changes as much as practical. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Update copyright via script for 2017Bruce Momjian2017-01-03
|
* Remove unnecessary int2vector-specific hash function and equality operator.Tom Lane2016-10-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These functions were originally added in commit d8cedf67a to support use of int2vector columns as catcache lookup keys. However, there are no catcaches that use such columns. (Indeed I now think it must always have been dead code: a catcache with such a key column would need an underlying unique index on the column, but we've never had an int2vector btree opclass.) Getting rid of the int2vector-specific operator and function does not lose any functionality, because operations on int2vectors will now fall back to the generic anyarray support. This avoids a wart that a btree index on an int2vector column (made using anyarray_ops) would fail to match equality searches, because int2vectoreq wasn't a member of the opclass. We don't really care much about that, since int2vector is not meant as a type for users to use, but it's silly to have extra code and less functionality. If we ever do want a catcache to be indexed by an int2vector column, we'd need to put back full btree and hash opclasses for int2vector, comparable to the support for oidvector. (The anyarray code can't be used at such a low level, because it needs to do catcache lookups.) But we'll deal with that if/when the need arises. Also worth noting is that removal of the hash int2vector_ops opclass will break any user-created hash indexes on int2vector columns. While hash anyarray_ops would serve the same purpose, it would probably not compute the same hash values and thus wouldn't be on-disk-compatible. Given that int2vector isn't a user-facing type and we're planning other incompatible changes in hash indexes for v10 anyway, this doesn't seem like something to worry about, but it's probably worth mentioning here. Amit Langote Discussion: <d9bb74f8-b194-7307-9ebd-90645d377e45@lab.ntt.co.jp>
* Update copyright for 2016Bruce Momjian2016-01-02
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.1
* Update copyright for 2015Bruce Momjian2015-01-06
| | | | Backpatch certain files through 9.0
* pgindent run for 9.4Bruce Momjian2014-05-06
| | | | | This includes removing tabs after periods in C comments, which was applied to back branches, so this change should not effect backpatching.
* Update copyright for 2014Bruce Momjian2014-01-07
| | | | | Update all files in head, and files COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml in all back branches.
* Update copyrights for 2013Bruce Momjian2013-01-01
| | | | | Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.
* Improve handling of INT_MIN / -1 and related cases.Tom Lane2012-11-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some platforms throw an exception for this division, rather than returning a necessarily-overflowed result. Since we were testing for overflow after the fact, an exception isn't nice. We can avoid the problem by treating division by -1 as negation. Add some regression tests so that we'll find out if any compilers try to optimize away the overflow check conditions. This ought to be back-patched, but I'm going to see what the buildfarm reports about the regression tests first. Per discussion with Xi Wang, though this is different from the patch he submitted.
* Fix the int8 and int2 cases of (minimum possible integer) % (-1).Tom Lane2012-11-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The correct answer for this (or any other case with arg2 = -1) is zero, but some machines throw a floating-point exception instead of behaving sanely. Commit f9ac414c35ea084ff70c564ab2c32adb06d5296f dealt with this in int4mod, but overlooked the fact that it also happens in int8mod (at least on my Linux x86_64 machine). Protect int2mod as well; it's not clear whether any machines fail there (mine does not) but since the test is so cheap it seems better safe than sorry. While at it, simplify the original guard in int4mod: we need only check for arg2 == -1, we don't need to check arg1 explicitly. Xi Wang, with some editing by me.
* Replace int2/int4 in C code with int16/int32Peter Eisentraut2012-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | The latter was already the dominant use, and it's preferable because in C the convention is that intXX means XX bits. Therefore, allowing mixed use of int2, int4, int8, int16, int32 is obviously confusing. Remove the typedefs for int2 and int4 for now. They don't seem to be widely used outside of the PostgreSQL source tree, and the few uses can probably be cleaned up by the time this ships.
* Update copyright notices for year 2012.Bruce Momjian2012-01-01
|
* Clean up the #include mess a little.Tom Lane2011-09-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | walsender.h should depend on xlog.h, not vice versa. (Actually, the inclusion was circular until a couple hours ago, which was even sillier; but Bruce broke it in the expedient rather than logically correct direction.) Because of that poor decision, plus blind application of pgrminclude, we had a situation where half the system was depending on xlog.h to include such unrelated stuff as array.h and guc.h. Clean up the header inclusion, and manually revert a lot of what pgrminclude had done so things build again. This episode reinforces my feeling that pgrminclude should not be run without adult supervision. Inclusion changes in header files in particular need to be reviewed with great care. More generally, it'd be good if we had a clearer notion of module layering to dictate which headers can sanely include which others ... but that's a big task for another day.
* Remove unnecessary #include references, per pgrminclude script.Bruce Momjian2011-09-01
|
* Add overflow checks to int4 and int8 versions of generate_series().Robert Haas2011-06-17
| | | | | | | | | The previous code went into an infinite loop after overflow. In fact, an overflow is not really an error; it just means that the current value is the last one we need to return. So, just arrange to stop immediately when overflow is detected. Back-patch all the way.
* Pass collations to functions in FunctionCallInfoData, not FmgrInfo.Tom Lane2011-04-12
| | | | | | | | | | | Since collation is effectively an argument, not a property of the function, FmgrInfo is really the wrong place for it; and this becomes critical in cases where a cached FmgrInfo is used for varying purposes that might need different collation settings. Fix by passing it in FunctionCallInfoData instead. In particular this allows a clean fix for bug #5970 (record_cmp not working). This requires touching a bit more code than the original method, but nobody ever thought that collations would not be an invasive patch...
* On further reflection, we'd better do the same in int.c.Tom Lane2011-03-11
| | | | | We previously heard of the same problem in int24div(), so there's not a good reason to suppose the problem is confined to cases involving int8.
* Stamp copyrights for year 2011.Bruce Momjian2011-01-01
|
* Remove cvs keywords from all files.Magnus Hagander2010-09-20
|
* pgindent run for 9.0Bruce Momjian2010-02-26
|
* Update copyright for the year 2010.Bruce Momjian2010-01-02
|
* Reject invalid input in int2vectorin.Robert Haas2009-12-30
| | | | | | | | | | Since the int2vector type is intended only for internal use, this patch doesn't worry about prettifying the error messages, which has the fringe benefit of avoiding creating additional translatable strings. For a type intended to be used by end-users, we would want to do better, but the approach taken here seems like the correct trade-off for this case. Caleb Welton
* Tigthen binary receive functions so that they reject values that the textHeikki Linnakangas2009-09-04
| | | | | | | | | input functions don't accept either. While the backend can handle such values fine, they can cause trouble in clients and in pg_dump/restore. This is followup to the original issue on time datatype reported by Andrew McNamara a while ago. Like that one, none of these seem worth back-patching.
* Install a workaround for a longstanding gcc bug that allows SIGFPE trapsTom Lane2009-09-03
| | | | | | | | | | | to occur for division by zero, even though the code is carefully avoiding that. All available evidence is that the only functions affected are int24div, int48div, and int28div, so patch just those three functions to include a "return" after the ereport() call. Backpatch to 8.4 so that the fix can be tested in production builds. For older branches our recommendation will continue to be to use -O1 on affected platforms (which are mostly non-mainstream anyway).
* Update copyright for 2009.Bruce Momjian2009-01-01
|
* Tweak the overflow checks in integer division functions to complain if theTom Lane2008-10-05
| | | | | | | | | | machine produces zero (rather than the more usual minimum-possible-integer) for the only possible overflow case. This has been seen to occur for at least some word widths on some hardware, and it's cheap enough to check for everywhere. Per Peter's analysis of buildfarm reports. This could be back-patched, but in the absence of any gripes from the field I doubt it's worth the trouble.
* Clean up some problems with redundant cross-type arithmetic operators. AddTom Lane2008-06-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | int2-and-int8 implementations of the basic arithmetic operators +, -, *, /. This doesn't really add any new functionality, but it avoids "operator is not unique" failures that formerly occurred in these cases because the parser couldn't decide whether to promote the int2 to int4 or int8. We could alternatively have removed the existing cross-type operators, but experimentation shows that the cost of an additional type coercion expression node is noticeable compared to such cheap operators; so let's not give up any performance here. On the other hand, I removed the int2-and-int4 modulo (%) operators since they didn't seem as important from a performance standpoint. Per a complaint last January from ykhuang.