aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Fix inconsistencies and style issues in new SQL/JSON codeAlvaro Herrera2023-03-30
| | | | | | Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/60483139-5c34-851d-baee-6c0d014e1710@gmail.com
* SQL/JSON: add standard JSON constructor functionsAlvaro Herrera2023-03-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit introduces the SQL/JSON standard-conforming constructors for JSON types: JSON_ARRAY() JSON_ARRAYAGG() JSON_OBJECT() JSON_OBJECTAGG() Most of the functionality was already present in PostgreSQL-specific functions, but these include some new functionality such as the ability to skip or include NULL values, and to allow duplicate keys or throw error when they are found, as well as the standard specified syntax to specify output type and format. Author: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> Author: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> Author: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com> Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF4Au4w2x-5LTnN_bxky-mq4=WOqsGsxSpENCzHRAzSnEd8+WQ@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220616233130.rparivafipt6doj3@alap3.anarazel.de Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/abd9b83b-aa66-f230-3d6d-734817f0995d%40postgresql.org
* Add SysCacheGetAttrNotNull for guaranteed not-null attrsDaniel Gustafsson2023-03-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | When extracting an attr from a cached tuple in the syscache with SysCacheGetAttr the isnull parameter must be checked in case the attr cannot be NULL. For cases when this is known beforehand, a wrapper is introduced which perform the errorhandling internally on behalf of the caller, invoking an elog in case of a NULL attr. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AD76405E-DB45-46B6-941F-17B1EB3A9076@yesql.se
* Fix incorrect comment in pg_get_partkeydef()David Rowley2023-03-07
| | | | | | | | | The comment claimed the output of the function was prefixed by "PARTITION BY". This is incorrect. Author: Japin Li Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/MEYP282MB166923B446FF5FE55B9DACB7B6B69@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
* Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.Tom Lane2023-02-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ruleutils.c blindly printed the user-given alias (or nothing if there hadn't been one) for the target table of INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE queries. That works a large percentage of the time, but not always: for queries appearing in WITH, it's possible that we chose a different alias to avoid conflict with outer-scope names. Since the chosen alias would be used in any Var references to the target table, this'd lead to an inconsistent printout with consequences such as dump/restore failures. The correct logic for printing (or not) a relation alias was embedded in get_from_clause_item. Factor it out to a separate function so that we don't need a jointree node to use it. (Only a limited part of that function can be reached from these new call sites, but this seems like the cleanest non-duplicative factorization.) In passing, I got rid of a redundant "\d+ rules_src" step in rules.sql. Initial report from Jonathan Katz; thanks to Vignesh C for analysis. This has been broken for a long time, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e947fa21-24b2-f922-375a-d4f763ef3e4b@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1MMntjmT_NJGp-Z=xbF02qHGAyuSHfYHias3TqQbPF2w@mail.gmail.com
* Fix typos in comments, code and documentationMichael Paquier2023-01-03
| | | | | | | | | | While on it, newlines are removed from the end of two elog() strings. The others are simple grammar mistakes. One comment in pg_upgrade referred incorrectly to sequences since a7e5457. Author: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221230231257.GI1153@telsasoft.com Backpatch-through: 11
* Update copyright for 2023Bruce Momjian2023-01-02
| | | | Backpatch-through: 11
* Fix psql's \sf and \ef for new-style SQL functions.Tom Lane2022-12-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some options of these commands need to be able to identify the start of the function body within the output of pg_get_functiondef(). It used to be that that always began with "AS", but since the introduction of new-style SQL functions, it might also start with "BEGIN" or "RETURN". Fix that on the psql side, and add some regression tests. Noted by me awhile ago, but I didn't do anything about it. Thanks to David Johnston for a nag. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM9PR01MB8268D5CDABDF044EE9F42173FE8C9@AM9PR01MB8268.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
* Fix under-parenthesized display of AT TIME ZONE constructs.Tom Lane2022-12-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In commit 40c24bfef, I forgot to use get_rule_expr_paren() for the arguments of AT TIME ZONE, resulting in possibly not printing parens for expressions that need it. But get_rule_expr_paren() wouldn't have gotten it right anyway, because isSimpleNode() hadn't been taught that COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX parent nodes don't guarantee sufficient parentheses. Improve all that. Also use this methodology for F_IS_NORMALIZED, so that we don't print useless parens for that. In passing, remove a comment that was obsoleted later. Per report from Duncan Sands. Back-patch to v14 where this code came in. (Before that, we didn't try to print AT TIME ZONE that way, so there was no bug just ugliness.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f41566aa-a057-6628-4b7c-b48770ecb84a@deepbluecap.com
* Replace SQLValueFunction by COERCE_SQL_SYNTAXMichael Paquier2022-11-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This switch impacts 9 patterns related to a SQL-mandated special syntax for function calls: - LOCALTIME [ ( typmod ) ] - LOCALTIMESTAMP [ ( typmod ) ] - CURRENT_TIME [ ( typmod ) ] - CURRENT_TIMESTAMP [ ( typmod ) ] - CURRENT_DATE Five new entries are added to pg_proc to compensate the removal of SQLValueFunction to provide backward-compatibility and making this change transparent for the end-user (for example for the attribute generated when a keyword is specified in a SELECT or in a FROM clause without an alias, or when specifying something else than an Iconst to the parser). The parser included a set of checks coming from the files in charge of holding the C functions used for the SQLValueFunction calls (as of transformSQLValueFunction()), which are now moved within each function's execution path, so this reduces the dependencies between the execution and the parsing steps. As of this change, all the SQL keywords use the same paths for their work, relying only on COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX. Like fb32748, no performance difference has been noticed, while the perf profiles get reduced with ExecEvalSQLValueFunction() gone. Bump catalog version. Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker, Ted Yu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YzaG3MoryCguUOym@paquier.xyz
* Switch SQLValueFunction on "name" to use COERCE_SQL_SYNTAXMichael Paquier2022-11-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit changes six SQL keywords to use COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX rather than relying on SQLValueFunction: - CURRENT_ROLE - CURRENT_USER - USER - SESSION_USER - CURRENT_CATALOG - CURRENT_SCHEMA Among the six, "user", "current_role" and "current_catalog" require specific SQL functions to allow ruleutils.c to map them to the SQL keywords these require when using COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX. Having pg_proc.proname match with the keyword ensures that the compatibility remains the same when projecting any of these keywords in a FROM clause to an attribute name when an alias is not specified. This is covered by the tests added in 2e0d80c, making sure that a correct mapping happens with each SQL keyword. The three others (current_schema, session_user and current_user) already have pg_proc entries for this job, so this brings more consistency between the way such keywords are treated in the parser, the executor and ruleutils.c. SQLValueFunction is reduced to half its contents after this change, simplifying its logic a bit as there is no need to enforce a C collation anymore for the entries returning a name as a result. I have made a few performance tests, with a million-ish calls to these keywords without seeing a difference in run-time or in perf profiles (ExecEvalSQLValueFunction() is removed from the profiles). The remaining SQLValueFunctions are now related to timestamps and dates. Bump catalog version. Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YzaG3MoryCguUOym@paquier.xyz
* Improve ruleutils' printout of LATERAL references within subplans.Tom Lane2022-11-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 1cc29fe7c, which taught EXPLAIN to print PARAM_EXEC Params as the referenced expressions, included some checks to prevent matching Params found in SubPlans or InitPlans to NestLoopParams of upper query levels. At the time, this seemed possibly necessary to avoid false matches because of the planner's habit of re-using the same PARAM_EXEC slot in multiple places in a plan. Furthermore, in the absence of LATERAL no such reference could be valid anyway. But it's possible now that we have LATERAL, and in the wake of 46c508fbc and 1db5667ba I believe the false-match hazard is gone. Hence, remove the in_same_plan_level checks. As shown in the regression test changes, this provides a useful improvement in readability for EXPLAIN of LATERAL-using subplans. Richard Guo, reviewed by Greg Stark and myself Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-YSOcQXAagJetP95cAeZPqzOy5kM5yijG0PVW5ztRb4w@mail.gmail.com
* Add repalloc0 and repalloc0_arrayPeter Eisentraut2022-11-12
| | | | | | | | These zero out the space added by repalloc. This is a common pattern that is quite hairy to code by hand. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b66dfc89-9365-cb57-4e1f-b7d31813eeec@enterprisedb.com
* Fix EXPLAIN of SEARCH BREADTH FIRST with a constant initial value.Tom Lane2022-10-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the non-recursive term of a SEARCH BREADTH FIRST recursive query has only constants in its target list, the planner will fold the starting RowExpr added by rewrite into a simple Const of type RECORD. The executor doesn't have any problem with that --- but EXPLAIN VERBOSE will encounter the Const as the ultimate source of truth about what the field names of the SET column are, and it didn't know what to do with that. Fortunately, we can pull the identifying typmod out of the Const, in much the same way that record_out would. For reasons that remain a bit obscure to me, this only fails with SEARCH BREADTH FIRST, not SEARCH DEPTH FIRST or CYCLE. But I added regression test cases for both of those options too, just to make sure we don't break it in future. Per bug #17644 from Matthijs van der Vleuten. Back-patch to v14 where these constructs were added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17644-3bd1f3036d6d7a16@postgresql.org
* Rename shadowed local variablesDavid Rowley2022-10-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | In a similar effort to f01592f91, here we mostly rename shadowed local variables to remove the warnings produced when compiling with -Wshadow=compatible-local. This fixes 63 warnings and leaves just 5. Author: Justin Pryzby, David Rowley Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion https://postgr.es/m/20220817145434.GC26426%40telsasoft.com
* Introduce SYSTEM_USERMichael Paquier2022-09-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SYSTEM_USER is a reserved keyword of the SQL specification that, roughly described, is aimed at reporting some information about the system user who has connected to the database server. It may include implementation-specific information about the means by the user connected, like an authentication method. This commit implements SYSTEM_USER as of auth_method:identity, where "auth_method" is a keyword about the authentication method used to log into the server (like peer, md5, scram-sha-256, gss, etc.) and "identity" is the authentication identity as introduced by 9afffcb (peer sets authn to the OS user name, gss to the user principal, etc.). This format has been suggested by Tom Lane. Note that thanks to d951052, SYSTEM_USER is available to parallel workers. Bump catalog version. Author: Bertrand Drouvot Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion, Joe Conway, Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7e692b8c-0b11-45db-1cad-3afc5b57409f@amazon.com
* Fix an assortment of improper usages of string functionsDavid Rowley2022-09-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In a similar effort to f736e188c and 110d81728, fixup various usages of string functions where a more appropriate function is available and more fit for purpose. These changes include: 1. Use cstring_to_text_with_len() instead of cstring_to_text() when working with a StringInfoData and the length can easily be obtained. 2. Use appendStringInfoString() instead of appendStringInfo() when no formatting is required. 3. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf("%s", ...) 4. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf(...) (with no formatting) 5. Use appendPQExpBufferChar() instead of appendPQExpBufferStr() when the length of the string being appended is 1. 6. appendStringInfoChar() instead of appendStringInfo() when no formatting is required and string is 1 char long. 7. Use appendPQExpBufferStr(b, .) instead of appendPQExpBuffer(b, "%s", .) 8. Don't use pstrdup when it's fine to just point to the string constant. I (David) did find other cases of #8 but opted to use #4 instead as I wasn't certain enough that applying #8 was ok (e.g in hba.c) Author: Ranier Vilela, David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo2j2+RJBGhNtUz6BxabWWh2Jx16wMUMWKUjv70Ver1vg@mail.gmail.com
* Revert SQL/JSON featuresAndrew Dunstan2022-09-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The reverts the following and makes some associated cleanups: commit f79b803dc: Common SQL/JSON clauses commit f4fb45d15: SQL/JSON constructors commit 5f0adec25: Make STRING an unreserved_keyword. commit 33a377608: IS JSON predicate commit 1a36bc9db: SQL/JSON query functions commit 606948b05: SQL JSON functions commit 49082c2cc: RETURNING clause for JSON() and JSON_SCALAR() commit 4e34747c8: JSON_TABLE commit fadb48b00: PLAN clauses for JSON_TABLE commit 2ef6f11b0: Reduce running time of jsonb_sqljson test commit 14d3f24fa: Further improve jsonb_sqljson parallel test commit a6baa4bad: Documentation for SQL/JSON features commit b46bcf7a4: Improve readability of SQL/JSON documentation. commit 112fdb352: Fix finalization for json_objectagg and friends commit fcdb35c32: Fix transformJsonBehavior commit 4cd8717af: Improve a couple of sql/json error messages commit f7a605f63: Small cleanups in SQL/JSON code commit 9c3d25e17: Fix JSON_OBJECTAGG uniquefying bug commit a79153b7a: Claim SQL standard compliance for SQL/JSON features commit a1e7616d6: Rework SQL/JSON documentation commit 8d9f9634e: Fix errors in copyfuncs/equalfuncs support for JSON node types. commit 3c633f32b: Only allow returning string types or bytea from json_serialize commit 67b26703b: expression eval: Fix EEOP_JSON_CONSTRUCTOR and EEOP_JSONEXPR size. The release notes are also adjusted. Backpatch to release 15. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/40d2c882-bcac-19a9-754d-4299e1d87ac7@postgresql.org
* More -Wshadow=compatible-local warning fixesDavid Rowley2022-08-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | In a similar effort to f01592f91, here we're targetting fixing the warnings where we've deemed the shadowing variable to serve a close enough purpose to the shadowed variable just to reuse the shadowed version and not declare the shadowing variable at all. By my count, this takes the warning count from 106 down to 71. Author: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220825020839.GT2342@telsasoft.com
* Further -Wshadow=compatible-local warning fixesDavid Rowley2022-08-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | These should have been included in 421892a19 as these shadowed variable warnings can also be fixed by adjusting the scope of the shadowed variable to put the declaration for it in an inner scope. This is part of the same effort as f01592f91. By my count, this takes the warning count from 114 down to 106. Author: David Rowley and Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrwLGBP%2BYw9vriayyf%3DXR4uPWP5jr6cQhP9au_kaDUhbA%40mail.gmail.com
* Avoid using list_length() to test for empty list.Tom Lane2022-08-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The standard way to check for list emptiness is to compare the List pointer to NIL; our list code goes out of its way to ensure that that is the only representation of an empty list. (An acceptable alternative is a plain boolean test for non-null pointer, but explicit mention of NIL is usually preferable.) Various places didn't get that memo and expressed the condition with list_length(), which might not be so bad except that there were such a variety of ways to check it exactly: equal to zero, less than or equal to zero, less than one, yadda yadda. In the name of code readability, let's standardize all those spellings as "list == NIL" or "list != NIL". (There's probably some microscopic efficiency gain too, though few of these look to be at all performance-critical.) A very small number of cases were left as-is because they seemed more consistent with other adjacent list_length tests that way. Peter Smith, with bikeshedding from a number of us Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PtQYe+ENX5KrONMfugf0q6NHg4hR5dAhqEXEc2eefFeig@mail.gmail.com
* Close old gap in dependency checks for functions returning composite.Tom Lane2022-07-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The dependency logic failed to register a column-level dependency when a view or rule contains a reference to a specific column of the result of a function-returning-composite. That meant you could drop the column from the composite type, causing trouble for future executions of the view. We've known about this for years, but never summoned the energy to actually fix it, instead installing various low-level defenses to prevent crashing on references to dropped columns. We had to do that to plug the hole in stable branches, where there might be pre-existing broken references; but let's fix the root cause today. To do that, add some logic (borrowed from get_rte_attribute_is_dropped) to find_expr_references_walker, to check whether a Var referencing an RTE_FUNCTION RTE is referencing a column of a composite type, and if so add the proper dependency. However ... it seems mighty unwise to remove said low-level defenses, since there could be other bugs now or in the future that allow reaching them. By the same token, letting those defenses go untested seems unwise. Hence, rather than just dropping the associated test cases, hack them to continue working by the expedient of manually dropping the pg_depend entries that this fix installs. Back-patch into v15. I don't want to risk changing this behavior in stable branches, but it seems not too late for v15. (Since we have already forced initdb for beta3, we can be sure that all production v15 installations will have these added dependencies.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/182492.1658431155@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix ruleutils issues with dropped cols in functions-returning-composite.Tom Lane2022-07-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Due to lack of concern for the case in the dependency code, it's possible to drop a column of a composite type even though stored queries have references to the dropped column via functions-in-FROM that return the composite type. There are "soft" references, namely FROM-clause aliases for such columns, and "hard" references, that is actual Vars referring to them. The right fix for hard references is to add dependencies preventing the drop; something we've known for many years and not done (and this commit still doesn't address it). A "soft" reference shouldn't prevent a drop though. We've been around on this before (cf. 9b35ddce9, 2c4debbd0), but nobody had noticed that the current behavior can result in dump/reload failures, because ruleutils.c can print more column aliases than the underlying composite type now has. So we need to rejigger the column-alias-handling code to treat such columns as dropped and not print aliases for them. Rather than writing new code for this, I used expandRTE() which already knows how to figure out which function result columns are dropped. I'd initially thought maybe we could use expandRTE() in all cases, but that fails for EXPLAIN's purposes, because the planner strips a lot of RTE infrastructure that expandRTE() needs. So this patch just uses it for unplanned function RTEs and otherwise does things the old way. If there is a hard reference (Var), then removing the column alias causes us to fail to print the Var, since there's no longer a name to print. Failing seems less desirable than printing a made-up name, so I made it print "?dropped?column?" instead. Per report from Timo Stolz. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5c91267e-3b6d-5795-189c-d15a55d61dbb@nullachtvierzehn.de
* Make subquery aliases optional in the FROM clause.Dean Rasheed2022-07-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This allows aliases for sub-SELECTs and VALUES clauses in the FROM clause to be omitted. This is an extension of the SQL standard, supported by some other database systems, and so eases the transition from such systems, as well as removing the minor inconvenience caused by requiring these aliases. Patch by me, reviewed by Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUCGCf82=hxd9N5n6xGHPyYpQnxW8HneeH+uP7yNALkWA@mail.gmail.com
* Add construct_array_builtin, deconstruct_array_builtinPeter Eisentraut2022-07-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There were many calls to construct_array() and deconstruct_array() for built-in types, for example, when dealing with system catalog columns. These all hardcoded the type attributes necessary to pass to these functions. To simplify this a bit, add construct_array_builtin(), deconstruct_array_builtin() as wrappers that centralize this hardcoded knowledge. This simplifies many call sites and reduces the amount of hardcoded stuff that is spread around. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2914356f-9e5f-8c59-2995-5997fc48bcba%40enterprisedb.com
* Show 'AS "?column?"' explicitly when it's important.Tom Lane2022-05-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ruleutils.c was coded to suppress the AS label for a SELECT output expression if the column name is "?column?", which is the parser's fallback if it can't think of something better. This is fine, and avoids ugly clutter, so long as (1) nothing further up in the parse tree relies on that column name or (2) the same fallback would be assigned when the rule or view definition is reloaded. Unfortunately (2) is far from certain, both because ruleutils.c might print the expression in a different form from how it was originally written and because FigureColname's rules might change in future releases. So we shouldn't rely on that. Detecting exactly whether there is any outer-level use of a SELECT column name would be rather expensive. This patch takes the simpler approach of just passing down a flag indicating whether there *could* be any outer use; for example, the output column names of a SubLink are not referenceable, and we also do not care about the names exposed by the right-hand side of a setop. This is sufficient to suppress unwanted clutter in all but one case in the regression tests. That seems like reasonable evidence that it won't be too much in users' faces, while still fixing the cases we need to fix. Per bug #17486 from Nicolas Lutic. This issue is ancient, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17486-1ad6fd786728b8af@postgresql.org
* Rename JsonIsPredicate.value_type, fix JSON backend/nodes/ infrastructure.Tom Lane2022-05-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I started out with the intention to rename value_type to item_type to avoid a collision with a typedef name that appears on some platforms. Along the way, I noticed that the adjacent field "format" was not being correctly handled by the backend/nodes/ infrastructure functions: copyfuncs.c erroneously treated it as a scalar, while equalfuncs, outfuncs, and readfuncs omitted handling it at all. This looks like it might be cosmetic at the moment because the field is always NULL after parse analysis; but that's likely a bug in itself, and the code's certainly not very future-proof. Let's fix it while we can still do so without forcing an initdb on beta testers. Further study found a few other inconsistencies in the backend/nodes/ infrastructure for the recently-added JSON node types, so fix those too. catversion bumped because of potential change in stored rules. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/526703.1652385613@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.Tom Lane2022-05-12
| | | | | Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files. I manually fixed a couple of comments that pgindent uglified.
* set_deparse_plan: Reuse variable to appease CoverityAlvaro Herrera2022-04-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Coverity complains that dpns->outer_plan is deferenced (to obtain ->targetlist) when possibly NULL. We can avoid this by using dpns->outer_tlist instead, which was already obtained a few lines up. The fact that we end up with dpns->inner_tlist = dpns->outer_tlist is a bit suspicious-looking and maybe worthy of more investigation, but I'll leave that for another day. Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202204191345.qerjy3kxi3eb@alvherre.pgsql
* Remove extraneous blank lines before block-closing bracesAlvaro Herrera2022-04-13
| | | | | | | | | These are useless and distracting. We wouldn't have written the code with them to begin with, so there's no reason to keep them. Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220411020336.GB26620@telsasoft.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/attachment/133167/0016-Extraneous-blank-lines.patch
* PLAN clauses for JSON_TABLEAndrew Dunstan2022-04-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These clauses allow the user to specify how data from nested paths are joined, allowing considerable freedom in shaping the tabular output of JSON_TABLE. PLAN DEFAULT allows the user to specify the global strategies when dealing with sibling or child nested paths. The is often sufficient to achieve the necessary goal, and is considerably simpler than the full PLAN clause, which allows the user to specify the strategy to be used for each named nested path. Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zhihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7e2cb85d-24cf-4abb-30a5-1a33715959bd@postgrespro.ru
* JSON_TABLEAndrew Dunstan2022-04-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This feature allows jsonb data to be treated as a table and thus used in a FROM clause like other tabular data. Data can be selected from the jsonb using jsonpath expressions, and hoisted out of nested structures in the jsonb to form multiple rows, more or less like an outer join. Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zhihong Yu (whose name I previously misspelled), Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7e2cb85d-24cf-4abb-30a5-1a33715959bd@postgrespro.ru
* RETURNING clause for JSON() and JSON_SCALAR()Andrew Dunstan2022-03-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch is extracted from a larger patch that allowed setting the default returned value from these functions to json or jsonb. That had problems, but this piece of it is fine. For these functions only json or jsonb can be specified in the RETURNING clause. Extracted from an original patch from Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* SQL JSON functionsAndrew Dunstan2022-03-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This Patch introduces three SQL standard JSON functions: JSON() (incorrectly mentioned in my commit message for f4fb45d15c) JSON_SCALAR() JSON_SERIALIZE() JSON() produces json values from text, bytea, json or jsonb values, and has facilitites for handling duplicate keys. JSON_SCALAR() produces a json value from any scalar sql value, including json and jsonb. JSON_SERIALIZE() produces text or bytea from input which containis or represents json or jsonb; For the most part these functions don't add any significant new capabilities, but they will be of use to users wanting standard compliant JSON handling. Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* SQL/JSON query functionsAndrew Dunstan2022-03-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This introduces the SQL/JSON functions for querying JSON data using jsonpath expressions. The functions are: JSON_EXISTS() JSON_QUERY() JSON_VALUE() All of these functions only operate on jsonb. The workaround for now is to cast the argument to jsonb. JSON_EXISTS() tests if the jsonpath expression applied to the jsonb value yields any values. JSON_VALUE() must return a single value, and an error occurs if it tries to return multiple values. JSON_QUERY() must return a json object or array, and there are various WRAPPER options for handling scalar or multi-value results. Both these functions have options for handling EMPTY and ERROR conditions. Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* IS JSON predicateAndrew Dunstan2022-03-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch intrdocuces the SQL standard IS JSON predicate. It operates on text and bytea values representing JSON as well as on the json and jsonb types. Each test has an IS and IS NOT variant. The tests are: IS JSON [VALUE] IS JSON ARRAY IS JSON OBJECT IS JSON SCALAR IS JSON WITH | WITHOUT UNIQUE KEYS These are mostly self-explanatory, but note that IS JSON WITHOUT UNIQUE KEYS is true whenever IS JSON is true, and IS JSON WITH UNIQUE KEYS is true whenever IS JSON is true except it IS JSON OBJECT is true and there are duplicate keys (which is never the case when applied to jsonb values). Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* Add public ruleutils.c entry point to deparse a Query.Tom Lane2022-03-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This has no in-core callers but will be wanted by extensions. It's just a thin wrapper around get_query_def, so it adds little code. Also, fix get_from_clause_item() to force insertion of an alias for a SUBQUERY RTE item. This is irrelevant to existing uses because RTE_SUBQUERY items made by the parser always have aliases already. However, if one tried to use pg_get_querydef() to inspect a post-rewrite Query, it could be an issue. In any case, get_from_clause_item already contained logic to force alias insertion for VALUES items, so the lack of the same for SUBQUERY is a pretty clear oversight. In passing, replace duplicated code for selection of pretty-print options with a common macro. Julien Rouhaud, reviewed by Pavel Stehule, Gilles Darold, and myself Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210627041138.zklczwmu3ms4ufnk@nol
* Add support for MERGE SQL commandAlvaro Herrera2022-03-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MERGE performs actions that modify rows in the target table using a source table or query. MERGE provides a single SQL statement that can conditionally INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE rows -- a task that would otherwise require multiple PL statements. For example, MERGE INTO target AS t USING source AS s ON t.tid = s.sid WHEN MATCHED AND t.balance > s.delta THEN UPDATE SET balance = t.balance - s.delta WHEN MATCHED THEN DELETE WHEN NOT MATCHED AND s.delta > 0 THEN INSERT VALUES (s.sid, s.delta) WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN DO NOTHING; MERGE works with regular tables, partitioned tables and inheritance hierarchies, including column and row security enforcement, as well as support for row and statement triggers and transition tables therein. MERGE is optimized for OLTP and is parameterizable, though also useful for large scale ETL/ELT. MERGE is not intended to be used in preference to existing single SQL commands for INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE since there is some overhead. MERGE can be used from PL/pgSQL. MERGE does not support targetting updatable views or foreign tables, and RETURNING clauses are not allowed either. These limitations are likely fixable with sufficient effort. Rewrite rules are also not supported, but it's not clear that we'd want to support them. Author: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Author: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> (earlier versions) Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> (earlier versions) Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> (earlier versions) Reviewed-by: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANP8+jKitBSrB7oTgT9CY2i1ObfOt36z0XMraQc+Xrz8QB0nXA@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkJdBuxj9PO=2QaO9-3h3xGbQPZ34kJH=HukRekwM-GZg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201231134736.GA25392@alvherre.pgsql
* Fix up compiler warnings/errors from f4fb45d15.Tom Lane2022-03-27
| | | | Per early buildfarm returns.
* SQL/JSON constructorsAndrew Dunstan2022-03-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch introduces the SQL/JSON standard constructors for JSON: JSON() JSON_ARRAY() JSON_ARRAYAGG() JSON_OBJECT() JSON_OBJECTAGG() For the most part these functions provide facilities that mimic existing json/jsonb functions. However, they also offer some useful additional functionality. In addition to text input, the JSON() function accepts bytea input, which it will decode and constuct a json value from. The other functions provide useful options for handling duplicate keys and null values. This series of patches will be followed by a consolidated documentation patch. Nikita Glukhov Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* Common SQL/JSON clausesAndrew Dunstan2022-03-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This introduces some of the building blocks used by the SQL/JSON constructor and query functions. Specifically, it provides node executor and grammar support for the FORMAT JSON [ENCODING foo] clause, and values decorated with it, and for the RETURNING clause. The following SQL/JSON patches will leverage these. Nikita Glukhov (who probably deserves an award for perseverance). Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* Revert "Common SQL/JSON clauses"Andrew Dunstan2022-03-22
| | | | | | This reverts commit 865fe4d5df560a6f5353da652018ff876978ad2d. This has caused issues with a significant number of buildfarm members
* Common SQL/JSON clausesAndrew Dunstan2022-03-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This introduces some of the building blocks used by the SQL/JSON constructor and query functions. Specifically, it provides node executor and grammar support for the FORMAT JSON [ENCODING foo] clause, and values decorated with it, and for the RETURNING clause. The following SQL/JSON patches will leverage these. Nikita Glukhov (who probably deserves an award for perseverance). Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup. Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu and Himanshu Upadhyaya. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru
* Fix assorted missing logic for GroupingFunc nodes.Tom Lane2022-03-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The planner needs to treat GroupingFunc like Aggref for many purposes, in particular with respect to processing of the argument expressions, which are not to be evaluated at runtime. A few places hadn't gotten that memo, notably including subselect.c's processing of outer-level aggregates. This resulted in assertion failures or wrong plans for cases in which a GROUPING() construct references an outer aggregation level. Also fix missing special cases for GroupingFunc in cost_qual_eval (resulting in wrong cost estimates for GROUPING(), although it's not clear that that would affect plan shapes in practice) and in ruleutils.c (resulting in excess parentheses in pretty-print mode). Per bug #17088 from Yaoguang Chen. Back-patch to all supported branches. Richard Guo, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17088-e33882b387de7f5c@postgresql.org
* Add UNIQUE null treatment optionPeter Eisentraut2022-02-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The SQL standard has been ambiguous about whether null values in unique constraints should be considered equal or not. Different implementations have different behaviors. In the SQL:202x draft, this has been formalized by making this implementation-defined and adding an option on unique constraint definitions UNIQUE [ NULLS [NOT] DISTINCT ] to choose a behavior explicitly. This patch adds this option to PostgreSQL. The default behavior remains UNIQUE NULLS DISTINCT. Making this happen in the btree code is pretty easy; most of the patch is just to carry the flag around to all the places that need it. The CREATE UNIQUE INDEX syntax extension is not from the standard, it's my own invention. I named all the internal flags, catalog columns, etc. in the negative ("nulls not distinct") so that the default PostgreSQL behavior is the default if the flag is false. Reviewed-by: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/84e5ee1b-387e-9a54-c326-9082674bde78@enterprisedb.com
* Fix ruleutils.c's dumping of whole-row Vars in more contexts.Tom Lane2022-01-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 7745bc352 intended to ensure that whole-row Vars would be printed with "::type" decoration in all contexts where plain "var.*" notation would result in star-expansion, notably in ROW() and VALUES() constructs. However, it missed the case of INSERT with a single-row VALUES, as reported by Timur Khanjanov. Nosing around ruleutils.c, I found a second oversight: the code for RowCompareExpr generates ROW() notation without benefit of an actual RowExpr, and naturally it wasn't in sync :-(. (The code for FieldStore also does this, but we don't expect that to generate strictly parsable SQL anyway, so I left it alone.) Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/efaba6f9-4190-56be-8ff2-7a1674f9194f@intrans.baku.az
* Make pg_get_expr() more bulletproof.Tom Lane2022-01-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since this function is defined to accept pg_node_tree values, it could get applied to any nodetree that can appear in a cataloged pg_node_tree column. Some such cases can't be supported --- for example, its API doesn't allow providing referents for more than one relation --- but we should try to throw a user-facing error rather than an internal error when encountering such a case. In support of this, extend expression_tree_walker/mutator to be sure they'll work on any such node tree (which basically means adding support for relpartbound node types). That allows us to run pull_varnos and check for the case of multiple relations before we start processing the tree. The alternative of changing the low-level error thrown for an out-of-range varno isn't appealing, because that could mask actual bugs in other usages of ruleutils. Per report from Justin Pryzby. This is basically cosmetic, so no back-patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211219205422.GT17618@telsasoft.com
* Update copyright for 2022Bruce Momjian2022-01-07
| | | | Backpatch-through: 10
* Allow specifying column list for foreign key ON DELETE SET actionsPeter Eisentraut2021-12-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Extend the foreign key ON DELETE actions SET NULL and SET DEFAULT by allowing the specification of a column list, like CREATE TABLE posts ( ... FOREIGN KEY (tenant_id, author_id) REFERENCES users ON DELETE SET NULL (author_id) ); If a column list is specified, only those columns are set to null/default, instead of all the columns in the foreign-key constraint. This is useful for multitenant or sharded schemas, where the tenant or shard ID is included in the primary key of all tables but shouldn't be set to null. Author: Paul Martinez <paulmtz@google.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACqFVBZQyMYJV=njbSMxf+rbDHpx=W=B7AEaMKn8dWn9OZJY7w@mail.gmail.com
* Fix display of SQL-standard function's arguments in INSERT/SELECT.Tom Lane2021-11-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a SQL-standard function body contains an INSERT ... SELECT statement, any function parameters referenced within the SELECT were always printed in $N style, rather than using the parameter name if any. While not strictly incorrect, this wasn't the intention, and it's inconsistent with the way that such parameters would be printed in any other kind of statement. The cause is that the recursion to get_query_def from get_insert_query_def neglected to pass down the context->namespaces list, passing constant NIL instead. This is a very ancient oversight, but AFAICT it had no visible consequences before commit e717a9a18 added an outermost namespace with function parameters. We don't allow INSERT ... SELECT as a sub-query, except in a top-level WITH clause, where it couldn't contain any outer references that might need to access upper namespaces. So although that's arguably a bug, I don't see any point in changing it before v14. In passing, harden the code added to get_parameter by e717a9a18 so that it won't crash if a PARAM_EXTERN Param appears in an unexpected place. Per report from Erki Eessaar. Code fix by me, regression test case by Masahiko Sawada. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM9PR01MB8268347BED344848555167FAFE949@AM9PR01MB8268.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-05-24 08:50:13 +0000