| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: cda21c1d7b160b303dc21dfe9d4169f2c8064c60
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ExecEvalCase() tried to save a cycle or two by passing
&econtext->caseValue_isNull as the isNull argument to its sub-evaluation of
the CASE value expression. If that subexpression itself contained a CASE,
then *isNull was an alias for econtext->caseValue_isNull within the
recursive call of ExecEvalCase(), leading to confusion about whether the
inner call's caseValue was null or not. In the worst case this could lead
to a core dump due to dereferencing a null pointer. Fix by not assigning
to the global variable until control comes back from the subexpression.
Also, avoid using the passed-in isNull pointer transiently for evaluation
of WHEN expressions. (Either one of these changes would have been
sufficient to fix the known misbehavior, but it's clear now that each of
these choices was in itself dangerous coding practice and best avoided.
There do not seem to be any similar hazards elsewhere in execQual.c.)
Also, it was possible for inlining of a SQL function that implements the
equality operator used for a CASE comparison to result in one CASE
expression's CaseTestExpr node being inserted inside another CASE
expression. This would certainly result in wrong answers since the
improperly nested CaseTestExpr would be caused to return the inner CASE's
comparison value not the outer's. If the CASE values were of different
data types, a crash might result; moreover such situations could be abused
to allow disclosure of portions of server memory. To fix, teach
inline_function to check for "bare" CaseTestExpr nodes in the arguments of
a function to be inlined, and avoid inlining if there are any.
Heikki Linnakangas, Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Report: https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/pull/327
Report: <4DDCEEB8.50602@enterprisedb.com>
Security: CVE-2016-5423
|
| |
|
|
| |
07d25a964 changed only one occurrence. Change the other one as well.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Although the standard has routines.result_cast_character_set_name, given
the naming of the surrounding columns, we concluded that this must have
been a mistake and that result_cast_char_set_name was intended, so
change the implementation. The documentation was already using the new
name.
found by Clément Prévost <prevostclement@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If ANALYZE found no repeated non-null entries in its sample, it set the
column's stadistinct value to -1.0, intending to indicate that the entries
are all distinct. But what this value actually means is that the number
of distinct values is 100% of the table's rowcount, and thus it was
overestimating the number of distinct values by however many nulls there
are. This could lead to very poor selectivity estimates, as for example
in a recent report from Andreas Joseph Krogh. We should discount the
stadistinct value by whatever we've estimated the nulls fraction to be.
(That is what will happen if we choose to use a negative stadistinct for
a column that does have repeated entries, so this code path was just
inconsistent.)
In addition to fixing the stadistinct entries stored by several different
ANALYZE code paths, adjust the logic where get_variable_numdistinct()
forces an "all distinct" estimate on the basis of finding a relevant unique
index. Unique indexes don't reject nulls, so there's no reason to assume
that the null fraction doesn't apply.
Back-patch to all supported branches. Back-patching is a bit of a judgment
call, but this problem seems to affect only a few users (else we'd have
identified it long ago), and it's bad enough when it does happen that
destabilizing plan choices in a worse direction seems unlikely.
Patch by me, with documentation wording suggested by Dean Rasheed
Report: <VisenaEmail.26.df42f82acae38a58.156463942b8@tc7-visena>
Discussion: <16143.1470350371@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Oversight in commit 976b24fb4.
Andreas Seltenreich
Report: <87y448l3ag.fsf@credativ.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussion of commit 3e2f3c2e4 exposed a problem that is of longer
standing: since we don't detoast data while sticking it into a portal's
holdStore for PORTAL_ONE_RETURNING and PORTAL_UTIL_SELECT queries, and we
release the query's snapshot as soon as we're done loading the holdStore,
later readout of the holdStore can do TOAST fetches against data that can
no longer be seen by any of the session's live snapshots. This means that
a concurrent VACUUM could remove the TOAST data before we can fetch it.
Commit 3e2f3c2e4 exposed the problem by showing that sometimes we had *no*
live snapshots while fetching TOAST data, but we'd be at risk anyway.
I believe this code was all right when written, because our management of a
session's exposed xmin was such that the TOAST references were safe until
end of transaction. But that's no longer true now that we can advance or
clear our PGXACT.xmin intra-transaction.
To fix, copy the query's snapshot during FillPortalStore() and save it in
the Portal; release it only when the portal is dropped. This essentially
implements a policy that we must hold a relevant snapshot whenever we
access potentially-toasted data. We had already come to that conclusion
in other places, cf commits 08e261cbc94ce9a7 and ec543db77b6b72f2.
I'd have liked to add a regression test case for this, but I didn't see
a way to make one that's not unreasonably bloated; it seems to require
returning a toasted value to the client, and those will be big.
In passing, improve PortalRunUtility() so that it positively verifies
that its ending PopActiveSnapshot() call will pop the expected snapshot,
removing a rather shaky assumption about which utility commands might
do their own PopActiveSnapshot(). There's no known bug here, but now
that we're actively referencing the snapshot it's almost free to make
this code a bit more bulletproof.
We might want to consider back-patching something like this into older
branches, but it would be prudent to let it prove itself more in HEAD
beforehand.
Discussion: <87vazemeda.fsf@credativ.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The sole caller expects NULL to be returned in such a case, so make
it so and document it.
Per reports from Andreas Seltenreich and Regina Obe. This doesn't
really fix their problem, as now their RETURNING queries will say
"ERROR: no known snapshots", but in any case this function should
not dump core in a reasonably-foreseeable situation.
Report: <87vazemeda.fsf@credativ.de>
Report: <20160807051854.1427.32414@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This oversight could cause logical decoding to fail to decode an outer
transaction containing changes, if a subtransaction had an XID but no
actual changes. Per bug #14279 from Marko Tiikkaja. Patch by Marko
based on analysis by Andrew Gierth.
Discussion: <20160804191757.1430.39011@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In _bt_unlink_halfdead_page(), we might fail to find an immediate left
sibling of the target page, perhaps because of corruption of the page
sibling links. The code intends to cope with this by just abandoning
the deletion attempt; but what actually happens is that it fails outright
due to releasing the same buffer lock twice. (And error recovery masks
a second problem, which is possible leakage of a pin on another page.)
Seems to have been introduced by careless refactoring in commit efada2b8e.
Since there are multiple cases to consider, let's make releasing the buffer
lock in the failure case the responsibility of _bt_unlink_halfdead_page()
not its caller.
Also, avoid fetching the leaf page's left-link again after we've dropped
lock on the page. This is probably harmless, but it's not exactly good
coding practice.
Per report from Kyotaro Horiguchi. Back-patch to 9.4 where the faulty code
was introduced.
Discussion: <20160803.173116.111915228.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is required for the result to be a legal tsvector value.
Noted while fooling with Andreas Seltenreich's ts_delete() crash.
Discussion: <87invhoj6e.fsf@credativ.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Such cases either failed an Assert, or produced a corrupt tsvector in
non-Assert builds, as reported by Andreas Seltenreich. The reason is
that tsvector_delete_by_indices() just assumed that its input array had
no duplicates. Fix by explicitly de-duping.
In passing, improve some comments, and fix a number of tests for null
values to use ERRCODE_NULL_VALUE_NOT_ALLOWED not
ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE.
Discussion: <87invhoj6e.fsf@credativ.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Messed up by recent commits --- this is annoying me while trying to fix
some bugs here.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tqual.h is included in some front-end compiles, and a static inline
breaks on buildfarm member castoroides. Since the macro is never
referenced, it should dodge that problem, although this doesn't
seem like the cleanest way of hiding things from front-end compiles.
Report and review by Tom Lane; patch by me.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As mentioned in its commit message, eca0f1db left open a race condition,
where a page could be marked all-visible, after the code checked
PageIsAllVisible() to pin the VM, but before the page is locked. Plug
that hole.
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas, Andres Freund
Author: Amit Kapila
Discussion: CAEepm=3fWAbWryVW9swHyLTY4sXVf0xbLvXqOwUoDiNCx9mBjQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: -
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some conditions resulted in "return" directly out of a PG_TRY block,
which left the exception stack dangling, and to add insult to injury
failed to restore the state of set_latch_on_sigusr1.
This is a bug only in 9.5; in HEAD it was accidentally fixed by commit
db0f6cad4, which removed the surrounding PG_TRY block. However, I (tgl)
chose to apply the patch to HEAD as well, because the old coding was
gratuitously different from WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup(), and there
would indeed have been no bug if it were done like that to start with.
Dmitry Ivanov
Discussion: <1637882.WfYN5gPf1A@abook>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, we tested for MVCC snapshots to see whether they were too
old, but not TOAST snapshots, which can lead to complaints about missing
TOAST chunks if those chunks are subject to early pruning. Ideally,
the threshold lsn and timestamp for a TOAST snapshot would be that of
the corresponding MVCC snapshot, but since we have no way of deciding
which MVCC snapshot was used to fetch the TOAST pointer, use the oldest
active or registered snapshot instead.
Reported by Andres Freund, who also sketched out what the fix should
look like. Patch by me, reviewed by Amit Kapila.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, if an INSERT with multiple rows of VALUES had indirection
(array subscripting or field selection) in its target-columns list, the
parser handled that by applying transformAssignedExpr() to each element
of each VALUES row independently. This led to having ArrayRef assignment
nodes or FieldStore nodes in each row of the VALUES RTE. That works for
simple cases, but in bug #14265 Nuri Boardman points out that it fails
if there are multiple assignments to elements/fields of the same target
column. For such cases to work, rewriteTargetListIU() has to nest the
ArrayRefs or FieldStores together to produce a single expression to be
assigned to the column. But it failed to find them in the top-level
targetlist and issued an error about "multiple assignments to same column".
We could possibly fix this by teaching the rewriter to apply
rewriteTargetListIU to each VALUES row separately, but that would be messy
(it would change the output rowtype of the VALUES RTE, for example) and
inefficient. Instead, let's fix the parser so that the VALUES RTE outputs
are just the user-specified values, cast to the right type if necessary,
and then the ArrayRefs or FieldStores are applied in the top-level
targetlist to Vars representing the RTE's outputs. This is the same
parsetree representation already used for similar cases with INSERT/SELECT
syntax, so it allows simplifications in ruleutils.c, which no longer needs
to treat INSERT-from-multiple-VALUES as its own special case.
This implementation works by applying transformAssignedExpr to the VALUES
entries as before, and then stripping off any ArrayRefs or FieldStores it
adds. With lots of VALUES rows it would be noticeably more efficient to
not add those nodes in the first place. But that's just an optimization
not a bug fix, and there doesn't seem to be any good way to do it without
significant refactoring. (A non-invasive answer would be to apply
transformAssignedExpr + stripping to just the first VALUES row, and then
just forcibly cast remaining rows to the same data types exposed in the
first row. But this way would lead to different, not-INSERT-specific
errors being reported in casting failure cases, so it doesn't seem very
nice.) So leave that for later; this patch at least isn't making the
per-row parsing work worse, and it does make the finished parsetree
smaller, saving rewriter and planner work.
Catversion bump because stored rules containing such INSERTs would need
to change. Because of that, no back-patch, even though this is a very
long-standing bug.
Report: <20160727005725.7438.26021@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Discussion: <9578.1469645245@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't want postmaster child processes to contain a copy of the
postmaster's PostmasterContext. That would be a waste of memory at least,
and at worst a security issue, since there are copies of the semi-sensitive
pg_hba and pg_ident data in there. All other child process types delete
the PostmasterContext after forking, but the original coding of the
background worker patch (commit da07a1e85) did not do so. It appears
that the only reason for that was to avoid copying the bgworker's
MyBgworkerEntry out of that context; but the couple of additional
statements needed to do so are hardly good justification for it. Hence,
copy that data and then clear the context as other child processes do.
Because this patch changes the memory context in which a bgworker function
gains control, back-patching it would be a bit risky, so we won't fix this
in back branches. The "security" complaint is pretty thin anyway for
generic bgworkers; only with the introduction of parallel query is there
any question of running untrusted code in a bgworker process.
Discussion: <14111.1470082717@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
| |
From: Clément Prévost <prevostclement@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Author: Amit Langote
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is apparently harmless on Windows, but on Unix it results in an
assertion failure. We'd not noticed because this code doesn't get
used on Unix unless you build with -DEXEC_BACKEND. Bug was evidently
introduced by sloppy refactoring in commit 31c453165.
Thomas Munro
Discussion: <CAEepm=1VOnbVx4wsgQFvj94hu9jVt2nVabCr7QiooUSvPJXkgQ@mail.gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As noted by Alvaro, there are CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() calls in the shm_mq.c
functions called by HandleParallelMessages(). I believe they're all
unreachable since we always pass nowait = true, but it doesn't seem like
a great idea to assume that no such call will ever be reachable from
HandleParallelMessages(). If that did happen, there would be a risk of a
recursive call to HandleParallelMessages(), which it does not appear to be
designed for --- for example, there's nothing that would prevent
out-of-order processing of received messages. And certainly such cases
cannot easily be tested. So let's prevent it by holding off interrupts for
the duration of the function. Back-patch to 9.5 which contains identical
code.
Discussion: <14869.1470083848@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Setting it to 0 is probably not useful in practice, but it allows
testing of situations without available background worker slots.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ParallelMessagePending *must* be marked volatile, because it's set
by a signal handler. On the other hand, it's pointless for
HandleParallelMessageInterrupt to save/restore errno; that must be,
and is, done at the outer level of the SIGUSR1 signal handler.
Calling CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() inside HandleParallelMessages, which itself
is called from CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), seems both useless and hazardous.
The comment claiming that this is needed to handle the error queue going
away is certainly misguided, in any case.
Improve a couple of error message texts, and use
ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE to report loss of parallel worker
connection, since that's what's used in e.g. tqueue.c. (Maybe it would be
worth inventing a dedicated ERRCODE for this type of failure? But I do not
think ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR is appropriate.)
Minor stylistic cleanups.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This coding pattern creates a race condition, because if an interesting
interrupt happens after we've checked InterruptPending but before we reset
our latch, the latch-setting done by the signal handler would get lost,
and then we might block at WaitLatch in the next iteration without ever
noticing the interrupt condition. You can put the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
before WaitLatch or after ResetLatch, but not between them.
Aside from fixing the bugs, add some explanatory comments to latch.h
to perhaps forestall the next person from making the same mistake.
In HEAD, also replace gather_readnext's direct call of
HandleParallelMessages with CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS. It does not seem clean
or useful for this one caller to bypass ProcessInterrupts and go straight
to HandleParallelMessages; not least because that fails to consider the
InterruptPending flag, resulting in useless work both here
(if InterruptPending isn't set) and in the next CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS call
(if it is).
This thinko seems to have been introduced in the initial coding of
storage/ipc/shm_mq.c (commit ec9037df2), and then blindly copied into all
the subsequent parallel-query support logic. Back-patch relevant hunks
to 9.4 to extirpate the error everywhere.
Discussion: <1661.1469996911@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When doing record typmod remapping, tqueue.c did fresh catalog lookups
for each tuple it processed, which was pretty horrible performance-wise
(it seemed to about halve the already none-too-quick speed of bulk reads
in parallel mode). Worse, it insisted on putting bits of that data into
TopMemoryContext, from where it never freed them, causing a
session-lifespan memory leak. (I suppose this was coded with the idea
that the sender process would quit after finishing the query ---
but the receiver uses the same code.)
Restructure to avoid repetitive catalog lookups and to keep that data
in a query-lifespan context, in or below the context where the
TQueueDestReceiver or TupleQueueReader itself lives.
Fix some other bugs such as continuing to use a tupledesc after
releasing our refcount on it. Clean up cavalier datatype choices
(typmods are int32, please, not int, and certainly not Oid). Improve
comments and error message wording.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TupleQueueReaderNext() leaks like a sieve if it has to do any tuple
disassembly/reconstruction. While we could try to clean up its allocations
piecemeal, it seems like a better idea just to insist that it should be run
in a short-lived memory context, so that any transient space goes away
automatically. I chose to have nodeGather.c switch into its existing
per-tuple context before the call, rather than inventing a separate
context inside tqueue.c.
This is sufficient to stop all leakage in the simple case I exhibited
earlier today (see link below), but it does not deal with leaks induced
in more complex cases by tqueue.c's insistence on using TopMemoryContext
for data that it's not actually trying hard to keep track of. That issue
is intertwined with another major source of inefficiency, namely failure
to cache lookup results across calls, so it seems best to deal with it
separately.
In passing, improve some comments, and modify gather_readnext's method for
deciding when it's visited all the readers so that it's more obviously
correct. (I'm not actually convinced that the previous code *is*
correct in the case of a reader deletion; it certainly seems fragile.)
Discussion: <32763.1469821037@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
| |
It's depressingly clear that nobody ever tested this.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we've nailed down the principle that NullTest with !argisrow
is fully equivalent to SQL's IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL, let's teach
the parser about it. This produces a slightly more compact parse tree
and is much more amenable to optimization than a DistinctExpr, since
the planner knows a good deal about NullTest and next to nothing about
DistinctExpr.
I'm not sure that there are all that many queries in the wild that could
be improved by this, but at least one source of such cases is the patch
just made to postgres_fdw to emit IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL when
IS [NOT] NULL isn't semantically correct.
No back-patch, since to the extent that this does affect planning results,
it might be considered undesirable plan destabilization.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commits 4452000f3 et al established semantics for NullTest.argisrow that
are a bit different from its initial conception: rather than being merely
a cache of whether we've determined the input to have composite type,
the flag now has the further meaning that we should apply field-by-field
testing as per the standard's definition of IS [NOT] NULL. If argisrow
is false and yet the input has composite type, the construct instead has
the semantics of IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL. Update the comments in
primnodes.h to clarify this, and fix ruleutils.c and deparse.c to print
such cases correctly. In the case of ruleutils.c, this merely results in
cosmetic changes in EXPLAIN output, since the case can't currently arise
in stored rules. However, it represents a live bug for deparse.c, which
would formerly have sent a remote query that had semantics different
from the local behavior. (From the user's standpoint, this means that
testing a remote nested-composite column for null-ness could have had
unexpected recursive behavior much like that fixed in 4452000f3.)
In a related but somewhat independent fix, make plancat.c set argisrow
to false in all NullTest expressions constructed to represent "attnotnull"
constructs. Since attnotnull is actually enforced as a simple null-value
check, this is a more accurate representation of the semantics; we were
previously overpromising what it meant for composite columns, which might
possibly lead to incorrect planner optimizations. (It seems that what the
SQL spec expects a NOT NULL constraint to mean is an IS NOT NULL test, so
arguably we are violating the spec and should fix attnotnull to do the
other thing. If we ever do, this part should get reverted.)
Back-patch, same as the previous commit.
Discussion: <10682.1469566308@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The docs failed to explain that LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES would not preserve
the names of indexes and associated constraints. Also, it wasn't mentioned
that EXCLUDE constraints would be copied by this option. The latter
oversight seems enough of a documentation bug to justify back-patching.
In passing, do some minor copy-editing in the same area, and add an entry
for LIKE under "Compatibility", since it's not exactly a faithful
implementation of the standard's feature.
Discussion: <20160728151154.AABE64016B@smtp.hushmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The keys are integers, not strings. The code accidentally worked on
little-endian machines, at least up to 256 distinct record types within
a session, but failed utterly on big-endian. This was unexpectedly
exposed by a test case added by commit 4452000f3, which apparently is the
only parallelizable query in the regression suite that uses more than one
anonymous record type. Fortunately, buildfarm member mandrill is
big-endian and is running with force_parallel_mode on, so it failed.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cost_rescan assumed that we don't need to rebuild the hash table when
rescanning a hash join. However, that's currently only true for
single-batch joins; for a multi-batch join we must charge full freight.
This probably has escaped notice because we'd be unlikely to put a hash
join on the inside of a nestloop anyway. Nonetheless, it's wrong.
Fix in HEAD, but don't backpatch for fear of destabilizing plans in
stable releases.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's no point in consulting retval->paramMask; it's always NULL.
Instead, we should consult from->paramMask.
Reported by Andrew Gierth.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ExecMakeTableFunctionResult(), which is used in SELECT FROM function(...)
cases, formerly treated a simple NULL output from a function that both
returnsSet and returnsTuple as a violation of the SRF protocol. What seems
better is to treat a NULL output as equivalent to ROW(NULL,NULL,...).
Without this, cases such as SELECT FROM unnest(...) on an array of
composite are vulnerable to unexpected and not-very-helpful failures.
Old code comments here suggested an alternative of just ignoring
simple-NULL outputs, but that doesn't seem very principled.
This change had been hung up for a long time due to uncertainty about
how much we wanted to buy into the equivalence of simple NULL and
ROW(NULL,NULL,...). I think that's been mostly resolved by the discussion
around bug #14235, so let's go ahead and do it.
Per bug #7808 from Joe Van Dyk. Although this is a pretty old report,
fixing it smells a bit more like a new feature than a bug fix, and the
lack of other similar complaints suggests that we shouldn't take much risk
of destabilization by back-patching. (Maybe that could be revisited once
this patch has withstood some field usage.)
Andrew Gierth and Tom Lane
Report: <E1TurJE-0006Es-TK@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, some functions returned various fixed strings and others
failed with a cache lookup error. Per discussion, standardize on
returning NULL. Although user-exposed "cache lookup failed" error
messages might normally qualify for bug-fix treatment, no back-patch;
the risk of breaking user code which is accustomed to the current
behavior seems too high.
Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The SQL standard appears to specify that IS [NOT] NULL's tests of field
nullness are non-recursive, ie, we shouldn't consider that a composite
field with value ROW(NULL,NULL) is null for this purpose.
ExecEvalNullTest got this right, but eval_const_expressions did not,
leading to weird inconsistencies depending on whether the expression
was such that the planner could apply constant folding.
Also, adjust the docs to mention that IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL can be
used as a substitute test if a simple null check is wanted for a rowtype
argument. That motivated reordering things so that IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM
is described before IS [NOT] NULL. In HEAD, I went a bit further and added
a table showing all the comparison-related predicates.
Per bug #14235. Back-patch to all supported branches, since it's certainly
undesirable that constant-folding should change the semantics.
Report and patch by Andrew Gierth; assorted wordsmithing and revised
regression test cases by me.
Report: <20160708024746.1410.57282@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The aggfilter expression should be removed from the parent (combining)
Aggref, since it's not supposed to apply the filter, and indeed cannot
because any Vars used in the filter would not be available after the
lower-level aggregation step. Per report from Jeff Janes.
(This has been broken since the introduction of partial aggregation,
I think. The error became obvious after commit 59a3795c2, when setrefs.c
began processing the parent Aggref's fields normally and thus would detect
such Vars. The special-case coding previously used in setrefs.c skipped
over the parent's aggfilter field without processing it. That was broken
in its own way because no other setrefs.c processing got applied either;
though since the executor would not execute the filter expression, only
initialize it, that oversight might not have had any visible symptoms at
present.)
Report: <CAMkU=1xfuPf2edAe4ZGXTmJpU7jxuKukKyvNtEXwu35B7dvejg@mail.gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These functions were added in commits fbe5a3fb7 and a104a017f,
but commit 45639a052 removed their only callers. Put the related
code in foreign.c back to the way it was in 9.5, to avoid pointless
cross-version diffs.
Etsuro Fujita
Patch: <d674a3f1-6b63-519c-ef3f-f3188ed6a178@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Michael Paquier
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
runtime.sgml used to contain a table of estimated shared memory consumption
rates for max_connections and some other GUCs. Commit 390bfc643 removed
that on the well-founded grounds that (a) we weren't maintaining the
entries well and (b) it no longer mattered so much once we got out from
under SysV shmem limits. But it missed that there were even-more-obsolete
versions of some of those numbers in comments in postgresql.conf.sample.
Remove those too. Back-patch to 9.3 where the aforesaid commit went in.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Omission noted by Andres Freund.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Antonin Houska
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: 3d71988dffd3c0798a8864c55ca4b7833b48abb1
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since a892234 & fd31cd265 the visibilitymap's freeze bit is used to
avoid vacuuming the whole relation in anti-wraparound vacuums. Doing so
correctly relies on not adding xids to the heap without also unsetting
the visibilitymap flag. Tuple locking related code has not done so.
To allow selectively resetting all-frozen - to avoid pessimizing
heap_lock_tuple - allow to selectively reset the all-frozen with
visibilitymap_clear(). To avoid having to use
visibilitymap_get_status (e.g. via VM_ALL_FROZEN) inside a critical
section, have visibilitymap_clear() return whether any bits have been
reset.
There's a remaining issue (denoted by XXX): After the PageIsAllVisible()
check in heap_lock_tuple() and heap_lock_updated_tuple_rec() the page
status could theoretically change. Practically that currently seems
impossible, because updaters will hold a page level pin already. Due to
the next beta coming up, it seems better to get the required WAL magic
bump done before resolving this issue.
The added flags field fields to xl_heap_lock and xl_heap_lock_updated
require bumping the WAL magic. Since there's already been a catversion
bump since the last beta, that's not an issue.
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas, Amit Kapila and Andres Freund
Author: Masahiko Sawada, heavily revised by Andres Freund
Discussion: CAEepm=3fWAbWryVW9swHyLTY4sXVf0xbLvXqOwUoDiNCx9mBjQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: -
|
