| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Broken by commits 7fe2f67c7c9f, 81f287dc923f and bf1119d74a79. Backpatch
to 18, same as the offending commits.
Backpatch-through: 18
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Querying the NUMA status can be quite time consuming, especially with
large shared buffers. 8cc139bec34a called numa_move_pages() once, for
all buffers, and we had to wait for the syscall to complete.
But with the chunking, introduced by 7fe2f67c7c to work around a kernel
bug, we can do CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() after each chunk, allowing users
to abort the execution.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aEtDozLmtZddARdB@msg.df7cb.de
Backpatch-through: 18
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's a kernel bug in do_pages_stat(), affecting systems combining
64-bit kernel and 32-bit user space. The function splits the request
into chunks of 16 pointers, but forgets the pointers are 32-bit when
advancing to the next chunk. Some of the pointers get skipped, and
memory after the array is interpreted as pointers. The result is that
the produced status of memory pages is mostly bogus.
Systems combining 64-bit and 32-bit environments like this might seem
rare, but that's not the case - all 32-bit Debian packages are built in
a 32-bit chroot on a system with a 64-bit kernel.
This is a long-standing kernel bug (since 2010), affecting pretty much
all kernels, so it'll take time until all systems get a fixed kernel.
Luckily, we can work around the issue by chunking the requests the same
way do_pages_stat() does, at least on affected systems. We don't know
what kernel a 32-bit build will run on, so all 32-bit builds use chunks
of 16 elements (the largest chunk before hitting the issue).
64-bit builds are not affected by this issue, and so could work without
the chunking. But chunking has other advantages, so we apply chunking
even for 64-bit builds, with chunks of 1024 elements.
Reported-by: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Author: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aEtDozLmtZddARdB@msg.df7cb.de
Context: https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=175077821909222&w=2
Backpatch-through: 18
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This moves/renames some of the functions defined in pg_numa.c:
* pg_numa_get_pagesize() is renamed to pg_get_shmem_pagesize(), and
moved to src/backend/storage/ipc/shmem.c. The new name better reflects
that the page size is not related to NUMA, and it's specifically about
the page size used for the main shared memory segment.
* move pg_numa_available() to src/backend/storage/ipc/shmem.c, i.e. into
the backend (which more appropriate for functions callable from SQL).
While at it, improve the comment to explain what page size it returns.
* remove unnecessary includes from src/port/pg_numa.c, adding
unnecessary dependencies (src/port should be suitable for frontent).
These were either leftovers or unnecessary thanks to the other changes
in this commit.
This eliminates unnecessary dependencies on backend symbols, which we
don't want in src/port.
Reported-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPi5fj0a7UG7Fmw2cUD1uWuckU_e8dJ+6x-bJEokcSXzqA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
Add basic NUMA awareness routines, using a minimal src/port/pg_numa.c
portability wrapper and an optional build dependency, enabled by
--with-libnuma configure option. For now this is Linux-only, other
platforms may be supported later.
A built-in SQL function pg_numa_available() allows checking NUMA
support, i.e. that the server was built/linked with the NUMA library.
The main function introduced is pg_numa_query_pages(), which allows
determining the NUMA node for individual memory pages. Internally the
function uses move_pages(2) syscall, as it allows batching, and is more
efficient than get_mempolicy(2).
Author: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>
Co-authored-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKZiRmxh6KWo0aqRqvmcoaX2jUxZYb4kGp3N%3Dq1w%2BDiH-696Xw%40mail.gmail.com
|
