aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Fix pg_current_logfile() to not emit a carriage return on Windows.Tom Lane2020-07-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Due to not having our signals straight about CRLF vs. LF line termination, the output of pg_current_logfile() included a trailing \r on Windows. To fix, force the file descriptor it uses into text mode. While here, move a couple of local variable declarations to make the function's logic clearer. In v12 and v13, also back-patch the test added by 1c4e88e2f so that this function has some test coverage. However, the 004_logrotate.pl test script doesn't exist before v12, and it didn't seem worth adding to older branches just for this. Per report from Thomas Kellerer. Back-patch to v10 where this function was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/412ae8da-76bb-640f-039a-f3513499e53d@gmx.net
* Fix whitespace in HashAgg EXPLAIN ANALYZEDavid Rowley2020-07-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | The Sort node does not put a space between the number of kilobytes and the "kB" of memory or disk space used, but HashAgg does. Here we align HashAgg to do the same as Sort. Sort has been displaying this information for longer than HashAgg, so it makes sense to align HashAgg to Sort rather than the other way around. Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200708163021.GW4107@telsasoft.com Backpatch-through: 13, where the hashagg started showing these details
* Fix incorrect variable datatype.Fujii Masao2020-07-08
| | | | | | | | | | | Since slot_keep_segs indicates the number of WAL segments not LSN, its datatype should not be XLogRecPtr. Back-patch to v13 where this issue was added. Reported-by: Atsushi Torikoshi Author: Atsushi Torikoshi, tweaked by Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ebd0d674f3e050222238a960cac5251a@oss.nttdata.com
* Morph pg_replication_slots.min_safe_lsn to safe_wal_sizeAlvaro Herrera2020-07-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The previous definition of the column was almost universally disliked, so provide this updated definition which is more useful for monitoring purposes: a large positive value is good, while zero or a negative value means danger. This should be operationally more convenient. Backpatch to 13, where the new column to pg_replication_slots (and the feature it represents) were added. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9ddfbf8c-2f67-904d-44ed-cf8bc5916228@oss.nttdata.com
* Remove extra whitespace in comments atop ReorderBufferCheckMemoryLimit.Amit Kapila2020-07-06
| | | | Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced
* Remove unused function parameter in end_parallel_vacuum.Amit Kapila2020-07-06
| | | | | | | Author: Vignesh C Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm3Ppt71NafGY5mk3V2i3Q+mm93pVibDq-0NpW7WU67Jcg@mail.gmail.com
* Rename enable_incrementalsort for clarityPeter Eisentraut2020-07-05
| | | | | Author: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/df652910-e985-9547-152c-9d4357dc3979%402ndquadrant.com
* Fix "ignoring return value" complaints from commit 96d1f423f9Joe Conway2020-07-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The cfbot and some BF animals are complaining about the previous read_binary_file commit because of ignoring return value of ‘fread’. So let's make everyone happy by testing the return value even though not strictly needed. Reported by Justin Pryzby, and suggested patch by Tom Lane. Backpatched to v11 same as the previous commit. Reported-By: Justin Pryzby Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/969b8d82-5bb2-5fa8-4eb1-f0e685c5d736%40joeconway.com Backpatch-through: 11
* Read until EOF vice stat-reported size in read_binary_fileJoe Conway2020-07-04
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | read_binary_file(), used by SQL functions pg_read_file() and friends, uses stat to determine file length to read, when not passed an explicit length as an argument. This is problematic, for example, if the file being read is a virtual file with a stat-reported length of zero. Arrange to read until EOF, or StringInfo data string lenth limit, is reached instead. Original complaint and patch by me, with significant review, corrections, advice, and code optimizations by Tom Lane. Backpatched to v11. Prior to that only paths relative to the data and log dirs were allowed for files, so no "zero length" files were reachable anyway. Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/969b8d82-5bb2-5fa8-4eb1-f0e685c5d736%40joeconway.com Backpatch-through: 11
* Clamp total-tuples estimates for foreign tables to ensure planner sanity.Tom Lane2020-07-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | After running GetForeignRelSize for a foreign table, adjust rel->tuples to be at least as large as rel->rows. This prevents bizarre behavior in estimate_num_groups() and perhaps other places, especially in the scenario where rel->tuples is zero because pg_class.reltuples is (suggesting that ANALYZE has never been run for the table). As things stood, we'd end up estimating one group out of any GROUP BY on such a table, whereas the default group-count estimate is more likely to result in a sane plan. Also, clarify in the documentation that GetForeignRelSize has the option to override the rel->tuples value if it has a better idea of what to use than what is in pg_class.reltuples. Per report from Jeff Janes. Back-patch to all supported branches. Patch by me; thanks to Etsuro Fujita for review Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1xNo9cnan+Npxgz0eK7394xmjmKg-QEm8wYG9P5-CcaqQ@mail.gmail.com
* Fix temporary tablespaces for shared filesets some more.Tom Lane2020-07-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit ecd9e9f0b fixed the problem in the wrong place, causing unwanted side-effects on the behavior of GetNextTempTableSpace(). Instead, let's make SharedFileSetInit() responsible for subbing in the value of MyDatabaseTableSpace when the default tablespace is called for. The convention about what is in the tempTableSpaces[] array is evidently insufficiently documented, so try to improve that. It also looks like SharedFileSetInit() is doing the wrong thing in the case where temp_tablespaces is empty. It was hard-wiring use of the pg_default tablespace, but it seems like using MyDatabaseTableSpace is more consistent with what happens for other temp files. Back-patch the reversion of PrepareTempTablespaces()'s behavior to 9.5, as ecd9e9f0b was. The changes in SharedFileSetInit() go back to v11 where that was introduced. (Note there is net zero code change before v11 from these two patch sets, so nothing to release-note.) Magnus Hagander and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevExg5YEsOvqMxrjoNvb3ApVyH+9jggWGKwTDFyFCVWczGQ@mail.gmail.com
* Fix temporary tablespaces for shared filesetsMagnus Hagander2020-07-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | A likely copy/paste error in 98e8b480532 from back in 2004 would cause temp tablespace to be reset to InvalidOid if temp_tablespaces was set to the same value as the primary tablespace in the database. This would cause shared filesets (such as for parallel hash joins) to ignore them, putting the temporary files in the default tablespace instead of the configured one. The bug is in the old code, but it appears to have been exposed only once we had shared filesets. Reviewed-By: Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevExg5YEsOvqMxrjoNvb3ApVyH+9jggWGKwTDFyFCVWczGQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Improve vacuum error context handling.Amit Kapila2020-07-01
| | | | | | | | | | Use separate functions to save and restore error context information as that made code easier to understand.  Also, make it clear that the index information required for error context is sane. Author: Andres Freund, Justin Pryzby, Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LWo+v1OWu=Sky27GTGSCuOmr7iaURNbc5xz6jO+SaPeA@mail.gmail.com
* Fix removal of files generated by TAP tests for SSLMichael Paquier2020-07-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 001_ssltests.pl and 002_scram.pl both generated an extra file for a client key used in the tests that were not removed. In Debian, this causes repeated builds to fail. The code refactoring done in 4dc6355 broke the cleanup done in 001_ssltests.pl, and the new tests added in 002_scram.pl via d6e612f forgot the removal of one file. While on it, fix a second issue introduced in 002_scram.pl where we use the same file name in 001 and 002 for the temporary client key whose permissions are changed in the test, as using the same file name in both tests could cause failures with parallel jobs of src/test/ssl/ if one test removes a file still needed by the second test. Reported-by: Felix Lechner Author: Daniel Gustafsson, Felix Lechner Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFHYt543sjX=Cm_aEeoejStyP47C+Y3+Wh6WbirLXsgUMaw7iw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
* Further adjustments to Hashagg EXPLAIN ANALYZE outputDavid Rowley2020-07-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The "Disk Usage" and "HashAgg Batches" properties in the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for HashAgg were previously only shown if the number of batches was greater than 0. Here we change this so that these properties are always shown for EXPLAIN ANALYZE formats other than "text". The idea here is that since the HashAgg could have spilled to disk if there had been more data or groups to aggregate, then it's relevant that we're clear in the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output when no spilling occurred in this particular execution of the given plan. For the "text" EXPLAIN format, we still hide these properties when no spilling occurs. This EXPLAIN format is designed to be easy for humans to read. To maintain the readability we have a higher threshold for which properties we display for this format. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo_dmNozQQTmN-2jGp1vT%3Ddxx7Q0vd%2BMvD1cGpv2HU%3DSg%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13, where the hashagg spilling code was added.
* Fix ecpg crash with bytea and cursor variables.Michael Meskes2020-06-30
| | | | Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
* Remove support for timezone "posixrules" file.Tom Lane2020-06-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The IANA tzcode library has a feature to read a time zone file named "posixrules" and apply the daylight-savings transition dates and times therein, when it is given a POSIX-style time zone specification that lacks an explicit transition rule. However, there's a problem with that code: it doesn't work for dates past the Y2038 time_t rollover. (Effectively, all times beyond that point are treated as standard time.) The IANA crew regard this feature as legacy, so their plan is to remove it not fix it. The time frame in which that will happen is unclear, but presumably it'll happen well before 2038. Moreover, effective with the next IANA data update (probably this fall), the recommended default will be to not install a "posixrules" file in the first place. The time frame in which tzdata packagers might adopt that suggestion is likewise unclear, but at least some platforms will probably do it in the next year or so. While we could ignore that recommendation so far as PG-supplied tzdata trees are concerned, builds using --with-system-tzdata will be subject to whatever the platform's tzdata packager decides to do. Thus, whether or not we do anything, some increasing fraction of Postgres users will be exposed to the behavior observed when there is no "posixrules" file; and if we do nothing, we'll have essentially no control over the timing of that change. The best thing to do to ameliorate the uncertainty seems to be to proactively remove the posixrules-reading feature. If we do that in a scheduled release then at least we can release-note the behavioral change, rather than having users be surprised by it after a routine tzdata update. The change in question is fairly minor anyway: to be affected, you have to be using a POSIX-style timezone spec, it has to not have an explicit rule, and it has to not be one of the four traditional continental-USA zone names (EST5EDT, CST6CDT, MST7MDT, or PST8PDT), as those are special-cased. Since the default "posixrules" file provides USA DST rules, the number of people who are likely to find such a zone spec useful is probably quite small. Moreover, the fallback behavior with no explicit rule and no "posixrules" file is to apply current USA rules, so the only thing that really breaks is the DST transitions in years before 2007 (and you get the countervailing fix that transitions after 2038 will be applied). Now, some installations might have replaced the "posixrules" file, allowing e.g. EU rules to be applied to a POSIX-style timezone spec. That won't work anymore. But it's not exactly clear why this solution would be preferable to using a regular named zone. In any case, given the Y2038 issue, we need to be pushing users to stop depending on this. Back-patch into v13; it hasn't been released yet, so it seems OK to change its behavior. (Personally I think we ought to back-patch further, but I've been outvoted.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1390.1562258309@sss.pgh.pa.us Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200621211855.6211-1-eggert@cs.ucla.edu
* Fix list of SSL error codes for older OpenSSL versions.Tom Lane2020-06-27
| | | | | Apparently 1.0.1 lacks SSL_R_VERSION_TOO_HIGH and SSL_R_VERSION_TOO_LOW. Per buildfarm.
* Add hints about protocol-version-related SSL connection failures.Tom Lane2020-06-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | OpenSSL's native reports about problems related to protocol version restrictions are pretty opaque and inconsistent. When we get an SSL error that is plausibly due to this, emit a hint message that includes the range of SSL protocol versions we (think we) are allowing. This should at least get the user thinking in the right direction to resolve the problem, even if the hint isn't totally accurate, which it might not be for assorted reasons. Back-patch to v13 where we increased the default minimum protocol version, thereby increasing the risk of this class of failure. Patch by me, reviewed by Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a9408304-4381-a5af-d259-e55d349ae4ce@2ndquadrant.com
* Change libpq's default ssl_min_protocol_version to TLSv1.2.Tom Lane2020-06-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When we initially created this parameter, in commit ff8ca5fad, we left the default as "allow any protocol version" on grounds of backwards compatibility. However, that's inconsistent with the backend's default since b1abfec82; protocol versions prior to 1.2 are not considered very secure; and OpenSSL has had TLSv1.2 support since 2012, so the number of PG servers that need a lesser minimum is probably quite small. On top of those things, it emerges that some popular distros (including Debian and RHEL) set MinProtocol=TLSv1.2 in openssl.cnf. Thus, far from having "allow any protocol version" behavior in practice, what we actually have as things stand is a platform-dependent lower limit. So, change our minds and set the min version to TLSv1.2. Anybody wanting to connect with a new libpq to a pre-2012 server can either set ssl_min_protocol_version=TLSv1 or accept the fallback to non-SSL. Back-patch to v13 where the aforementioned patches appeared. Patch by me, reviewed by Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a9408304-4381-a5af-d259-e55d349ae4ce@2ndquadrant.com
* Persist slot invalidation correctlyAlvaro Herrera2020-06-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We failed to save slot to disk after invalidating it, so the state was lost in case of server restart or crash. Fix by marking it dirty and flushing. Also, if the slot is known invalidated we don't need to reason about the LSN at all -- it's known invalidated. Only test the LSN if the slot is known not invalidated. Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17a69cfe-f1c1-a416-ee25-ae15427c69eb@oss.nttdata.com
* Fix misuse of table_index_fetch_tuple_check().Peter Geoghegan2020-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 0d861bbb, which added deduplication to nbtree, had _bt_check_unique() pass a TID to table_index_fetch_tuple_check() that isn't safe to mutate. table_index_fetch_tuple_check()'s tid argument is modified when the TID in question is not the latest visible tuple in a hot chain, though this wasn't documented. To fix, go back to using a local copy of the TID in _bt_check_unique(), and update comments above table_index_fetch_tuple_check(). Backpatch: 13-, where B-Tree deduplication was introduced.
* Remove erroneous assertion from pg_copy_logical_replication_slot().Fujii Masao2020-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If restart_lsn of logical replication slot gets behind more than max_slot_wal_keep_size from the current LSN, the logical replication slot would be invalidated and its restart_lsn is reset to an invalid LSN. If this logical replication slot with an invalid restart_lsn was specified as the source slot in pg_copy_logical_replication_slot(), the function caused the assertion failure unexpectedly. This assertion was added because restart_lsn should not be invalid before. But in v13, it can be invalid thanks to max_slot_wal_keep_size. So since this assertion is no longer useful, this commit removes it. This commit also changes the errcode in the error message that pg_copy_logical_replication_slot() emits when the slot with an invalid restart_lsn is specified, to more appropriate one. Back-patch to v13 where max_slot_wal_keep_size was added and the assertion was no longer valid. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f91de4fb-a7ab-b90e-8132-74796e049d51@oss.nttdata.com
* Fix compiler warning induced by commit d8b15eeb8.Tom Lane2020-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | I forgot that INT64_FORMAT can't be used with sscanf on Windows. Use the same trick of sscanf'ing into a temp variable as we do in some other places in zic.c. The upstream IANA code avoids the portability problem by relying on <inttypes.h>'s SCNdFAST64 macro. Once we're requiring C99 in all branches, we should do likewise and drop this set of diffs from upstream. For now, though, a hack seems fine, since we do not actually care about leapseconds anyway. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4e5d1a5b-143e-e70e-a99d-a3b01c1ae7c3@2ndquadrant.com
* Adjust max_slot_wal_keep_size behavior per reviewAlvaro Herrera2020-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In pg_replication_slot, change output from normal/reserved/lost to reserved/extended/unreserved/ lost, which better expresses the possible states particularly near the time where segments are no longer safe but checkpoint has not run yet. Under the new definition, reserved means the slot is consuming WAL that's still under the normal WAL size constraints; extended means it's consuming WAL that's being protected by wal_keep_segments or the slot itself, whose size is below max_slot_wal_keep_size; unreserved means the WAL is no longer safe, but checkpoint has not yet removed those files. Such as slot is in imminent danger, but can still continue for a little while and may catch up to the reserved WAL space. Also, there were some bugs in the calculations used to report the status; fixed those. Backpatch to 13. Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200616.120236.1809496990963386593.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
* Save slot's restart_lsn when invalidated due to sizeAlvaro Herrera2020-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | We put it aside as invalidated_at, which let us show "lost" in pg_replication slot. Prior to this change, the state value was reported as NULL. Backpatch to 13. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200617.101707.1735599255100002667.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200407.120905.1507671100168805403.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
* Add parens to ConvertToXSegs macroAlvaro Herrera2020-06-24
| | | | | | | The current definition is dangerous. No bugs exist in our code at present, but backpatch to 11 nonetheless where it was introduced. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
* Undo double-quoting of index names in non-text EXPLAIN output formats.Tom Lane2020-06-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | explain_get_index_name() applied quote_identifier() to the index name. This is fine for text output, but the non-text output formats all have their own quoting conventions and would much rather start from the actual index name. For example in JSON you'd get something like "Index Name": "\"My Index\"", which is surely not desirable, especially when the same does not happen for table names. Hence, move the responsibility for applying quoting out to the callers, where it can go into already-existing special code paths for text format. This changes the API spec for users of explain_get_index_name_hook: before, they were supposed to apply quote_identifier() if necessary, now they should not. Research suggests that the only publicly available user of the hook is hypopg, and it actually forgot to apply quoting anyway, so it's fine. (In any case, there's no behavioral change for the output of a hook as seen in non-text EXPLAIN formats, so this won't break any case that programs should be relying on.) Digging in the commit logs, it appears that quoting was included in explain_get_index_name's duties when commit 604ffd280 invented it; and that was fine at the time because we only had text output format. This should have been rethought when non-text formats were invented, but it wasn't. This is a fairly clear bug for users of non-text EXPLAIN formats, so back-patch to all supported branches. Per bug #16502 from Maciek Sakrejda. Patch by me (based on investigation by Euler Taveira); thanks to Julien Rouhaud for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16502-57bd1c9f913ed1d1@postgresql.org
* Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut2020-06-22
| | | | | Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 434134899af310153f7511ccaa3f376e4c817e66
* Fix masking of SP-GiST pages during xlog consistency checkAlexander Korotkov2020-06-20
| | | | | | | | | | spg_mask() didn't take into account that pd_lower equal to SizeOfPageHeaderData is still valid value. This commit fixes that. Backpatch to 11, where spg_mask() pg_lower check was introduced. Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200615131405.GM52676%40paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 11
* Ensure write failure reports no-disk-spaceAlvaro Herrera2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A few places calling fwrite and gzwrite were not setting errno to ENOSPC when reporting errors, as is customary; this led to some failures being reported as "could not write file: Success" which makes us look silly. Make a few of these places in pg_dump and pg_basebackup use our customary pattern. Backpatch-to: 9.5 Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200611153753.GU14879@telsasoft.com
* Future-proof regression tests against possibly-missing posixrules file.Tom Lane2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The IANA time zone folk have deprecated use of a "posixrules" file in the tz database. While for now it's our choice whether to keep supplying one in our own builds, installations built with --with-system-tzdata will soon be needing to cope with that file not being present, at least on some platforms. This causes a problem for the horology test, which expected the nonstandard POSIX zone spec "CST7CDT" to apply pre-2007 US daylight savings rules. That does happen if the posixrules file supplies such information, but otherwise the test produces undesired results. To fix, add an explicit transition date rule that matches 2005 practice. (We could alternatively have switched the test to use some real time zone, but it seems useful to have coverage of this type of zone spec.) While at it, update a documentation example that also relied on "CST7CDT"; use a real-world zone name instead. Also, document why the zone names EST5EDT, CST6CDT, MST7MDT, PST8PDT aren't subject to similar failures when "posixrules" is missing. Back-patch to all supported branches, since the hazard is the same for all. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1665379.1592581287@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Fix deduplication "single value" strategy bug.Peter Geoghegan2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It was possible for deduplication's single value strategy to mistakenly believe that a very small duplicate tuple counts as one of the six large tuples that it aims to leave behind after the page finally splits. This could cause slightly suboptimal space utilization with very low cardinality indexes, though only under fairly narrow conditions. To fix, be particular about what kind of tuple counts as a maxpostingsize-capped tuple. This avoids confusion in the event of a small tuple that gets "wedged" between two large tuples, where all tuples on the page are duplicates of the same value. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=Y+sgSFc-O3LpiZX-POx2bC+okec2KafERHuzdVa7-rQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 13-, where deduplication was introduced (by commit 0d861bbb)
* Fix issues in invalidation of obsolete replication slots.Fujii Masao2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit fixes the following issues. 1. There is the case where the slot is dropped while trying to invalidate it. InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() did not handle this case, and which could cause checkpoint to fail. 2. InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() could emit the same log message multiple times unnecessary. It should be logged only once. 3. When marking the slot as used, we always searched the target slot from all the replication slots even if we already found it. This could cause useless waste of cycles. Back-patch to v13 where these issues were added as a part of max_slot_wal_keep_size code. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Alvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/66c05b67-3396-042c-1b41-bfa6c3ddcf82@oss.nttdata.com
* Fix EXPLAIN ANALYZE for parallel HashAgg plansDavid Rowley2020-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since 1f39bce02, HashAgg nodes have had the ability to spill to disk when memory consumption exceeds work_mem. That commit added new properties to EXPLAIN ANALYZE to show the maximum memory usage and disk usage, however, it didn't quite go as far as showing that information for parallel workers. Since workers may have experienced something very different from the main process, we should show this information per worker, as is done in Sort. Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpEKbfZa18mM1TD7qV6PG+w97pwCWq5tVD0dX7e11gRJw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13, where the hashagg spilling code was added.
* Fix deadlock danger when atomic ops are done under spinlock.Andres Freund2020-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was a danger only for --disable-spinlocks in combination with atomic operations unsupported by the current platform. While atomics.c was careful to signal that a separate semaphore ought to be used when spinlock emulation is active, spin.c didn't actually implement that mechanism. That's my (Andres') fault, it seems to have gotten lost during the development of the atomic operations support. Fix that issue and add test for nesting atomic operations inside a spinlock. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200605023302.g6v3ydozy5txifji@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.5-
* Add basic spinlock tests to regression tests.Andres Freund2020-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As s_lock_test, the already existing test for spinlocks, isn't run in an automated fashion (and doesn't test a normal backend environment), adding tests that are run as part of a normal regression run is a good idea. Particularly in light of several recent and upcoming spinlock related fixes. Currently the new tests are run as part of the pre-existing test_atomic_ops() test. That perhaps can be quibbled about, but for now seems ok. The only operations that s_lock_test tests but the new tests don't are the detection of a stuck spinlock and S_LOCK_FREE (which is otherwise unused, not implemented on all platforms, and will be removed). This currently contains a test for more than INT_MAX spinlocks (only run with --disable-spinlocks), to ensure the recent commit fixing a bug with more than INT_MAX spinlock initializations is correct. That test is somewhat slow, so we might want to disable it after a few days. It might be worth retiring s_lock_test after this. The added coverage of a stuck spinlock probably isn't worth the added complexity? Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200606023103.avzrctgv7476xj7i@alap3.anarazel.de
* Fix oldest xmin and LSN computation across repslots after advancingMichael Paquier2020-06-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Advancing a replication slot did not recompute the oldest xmin and LSN values across replication slots, preventing resource removal like segments not recycled at checkpoint time. The original commit that introduced the slot advancing in 9c7d06d never did the update of those oldest values, and b0afdca removed this code. This commit adds a TAP test to check segment recycling with advancing for physical slots, enforcing an extra segment switch before advancing to check if the segment gets correctly recycled after a checkpoint. Reported-by: Andres Freund Reviewed-by: Alexey Kondratov, Kyptaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200609171904.kpltxxvjzislidks@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch-through: 11
* Sync our copy of the timezone library with IANA release tzcode2020a.Tom Lane2020-06-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This absorbs a leap-second-related bug fix in localtime.c, and teaches zic to handle an expiration marker in the leapseconds file. Neither are of any interest to us (for the foreseeable future anyway), but we need to stay more or less in sync with upstream. Also adjust some over-eager changes in the README from commit 957338418. I have no intention of making changes that require C99 in this code, until such time as all the live back branches require C99. Otherwise back-patching will get too exciting. For the same reason, absorb assorted whitespace and other cosmetic changes from HEAD into the back branches; mostly this reflects use of improved versions of pgindent. All in all then, quite a boring update. But I figured I'd get it done while I was looking at this code.
* Fix nbtree.h dedup state comment.Peter Geoghegan2020-06-17
| | | | Oversight in commit 0d861bbb.
* spinlock emulation: Fix bug when more than INT_MAX spinlocks are initialized.Andres Freund2020-06-17
| | | | | | | | | | Once the counter goes negative we ended up with spinlocks that errored out on first use (due to check in tas_sema). Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200606023103.avzrctgv7476xj7i@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.5-
* Avoid potential spinlock in a signal handler as part of global barriers.Andres Freund2020-06-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | On platforms without support for 64bit atomic operations where we also cannot rely on 64bit reads to have single copy atomicity, such atomics are implemented using a spinlock based fallback. That means it's not safe to even read such atomics from within a signal handler (since the signal handler might run when the spinlock already is held). To avoid this issue defer global barrier processing out of the signal handler. Instead of checking local / shared barrier generation to determine whether to set ProcSignalBarrierPending, introduce PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER and always set ProcSignalBarrierPending when receiving such a signal. Additionally avoid redundant work in ProcessProcSignalBarrier if ProcSignalBarrierPending is unnecessarily. Also do a small amount of other polishing. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200609193723.eu5ilsjxwdpyxhgz@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 13-, where the code was introduced.
* Fix file reference in nls.mkPeter Eisentraut2020-06-16
| | | | Broken by move of fe_archive.c to fe_utils.
* Fix buffile.c error handling.Thomas Munro2020-06-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Convert buffile.c error handling to use ereport. This fixes cases where I/O errors were indistinguishable from EOF or not reported. Also remove "%m" from error messages where errno would be bogus. While we're modifying those strings, add block numbers and short read byte counts where appropriate. Back-patch to all supported releases. Reported-by: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJE04G%3D8TLK0DLypT_27D9dR8F1RQgNp0jK6qR0tZGWOw%40mail.gmail.com
* pg_upgrade: set vacuum_defer_cleanup_age to zeroBruce Momjian2020-06-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | Non-zero vacuum_defer_cleanup_age values cause pg_upgrade freezing of the system catalogs to be incomplete, or do nothing. This will cause the upgrade to fail in confusing ways. Reported-by: Laurenz Albe Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7d6f6c22ba05ce0c526e9e8b7bfa8105e7da45e6.camel@cybertec.at Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Fix behavior of float aggregates for single Inf or NaN inputs.Tom Lane2020-06-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When there is just one non-null input value, and it is infinity or NaN, aggregates such as stddev_pop and covar_pop should produce a NaN result, because the calculation is not well-defined. They used to do so, but since we adopted Youngs-Cramer aggregation in commit e954a727f, they produced zero instead. That's an oversight, so fix it. Add tests exercising these edge cases. Affected aggregates are var_pop(double precision) stddev_pop(double precision) var_pop(real) stddev_pop(real) regr_sxx(double precision,double precision) regr_syy(double precision,double precision) regr_sxy(double precision,double precision) regr_r2(double precision,double precision) regr_slope(double precision,double precision) regr_intercept(double precision,double precision) covar_pop(double precision,double precision) corr(double precision,double precision) Back-patch to v12 where the behavior change was accidentally introduced. Report and patch by me; thanks to Dean Rasheed for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/353062.1591898766@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Silence _bt_check_unique compiler warning.Peter Geoghegan2020-06-13
| | | | | Reported-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/841649.1592065060@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Add missing extern keyword for a couple of numutils functionsDavid Rowley2020-06-13
| | | | | | | | | In passing, also remove a few surplus empty lines from pg_ltoa and pg_ulltoa_n in numutils.c Reported-by: Andrew Gierth Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87y2ou3xuh.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk Backpatch-through: 13, where these changes were introduced
* Improve comments for [Heap]CheckForSerializableConflictOut().Thomas Munro2020-06-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | Rewrite the documentation of these functions, in light of recent bug fix commit 5940ffb2. Back-patch to 13 where the check-for-conflict-out code was split up into AM-specific and generic parts, and new documentation was added that now looked wrong. Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/db7b729d-0226-d162-a126-8a8ab2dc4443%40jepsen.io
* Fix mishandling of NaN counts in numeric_[avg_]combine.Tom Lane2020-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When merging two NumericAggStates, the code missed adding the new state's NaNcount unless its N was also nonzero; since those counts are independent, this is wrong. This would only have visible effect if some partial aggregate scans found only NaNs while earlier ones found only non-NaNs; then we could end up falsely deciding that there were no NaNs and fail to return a NaN final result as expected. That's pretty improbable, so it's no surprise this hasn't been reported from the field. Still, it's a bug. I didn't try to produce a regression test that would show the bug, but I did notice that these functions weren't being reached at all in our regression tests, so I improved the tests to at least exercise them. With these additions, I see pretty complete code coverage on the aggregation-related functions in numeric.c. Back-patch to 9.6 where this code was introduced. (I only added the improved test case as far back as v10, though, since the relevant part of aggregates.sql isn't there at all in 9.6.)
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-08-03 23:13:55 +0000